Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 763-769

  Kuhl S ^a   Zurcher S ^a   Mahid, T ^b   Muller Gerbl M ^c   Filippi, A ^a   Cattin, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Guidance; Templates

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDENTULOUSNESS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TORQUE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84878717411     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02484.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arisan, V., Cuneyt, K. & Özdemir, T. (2010) Accuracy of two stereolithographic guided system for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Journal of Periodontology 81: 43-51.
2. Ewers, R., Schicho, G., Undt, F., Wanschitz, F., Truppe, M., Seemann, R. & Wagner, A. (2005) Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 34: 1-8.
3. Fortin, T., Bosson, J.L., Coudert, J.L. & Isidori, M. (2007) Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 65: 393-399.
4. d'Haese, J., van der Velde, T., Komiyama, A., Hultin, M. & De Bruyn, H. (2010) Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clinical Implant Denistry and Related Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.210.00275.x.
5. Hämmerle, C.H., Stone, P., Jung, R.E., Kapos, T. & Brodala, N. (2009) Consensus statement and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 24(Suppl.): 126-130.
6. Jabero, M. & Sarment, D.P. (2006) Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dentistry 15: 135-142.
7. Jolliffe, I..T. (2002) Graphical representation of data using principal components. In: Jolliffe, I.T., ed. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edition, 78-110. New York: Springer Series in Statistics.
8. Jung, R.E., Schneider, D., Ganeles, J., Wismeijer, D., Zwahlen, M., Hämmerle, C.H. & Thmaseb, A. (2009) Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 24(Suppl.): 92-109.
9. Katsoulis, J., Pazera, P. & Mericske-Stern, R. (2009) Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 11: 238-245.
10. Miller, R.J. & Bier, J. (2006) Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dentistry 15: 41-47.
11. Nickenig, H.J. & Eitner, S. (2010) An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates - a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I). Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 38: 436-440.
12. Ozan, O., Orhan, K. & Turkyilmaz, I. (2011) Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 22: 1755-1761.
13. Ozan, O., Turkyilmaz, I., Ersoy, A.E., Mc Glumphy, E.A. & Rosenstiel, S.F. (2009) Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67: 394-401.
14. Ruppin, J., Popovic, A., Strauss, M., Spuntrup, E., Steiner, A. & Stoll, C. (2008) Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Journal of Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 709-716.
15. Rusinkiewicz, S. & Levoy, M. (2001) Efficient Variants of the ICP Algorithm. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~smr/papers/fasticp/fasticp_paper.pdf
16. Schneider, D., Marquardt, P., Zwahlen, P. & Jung, R.E. (2009) A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Journal of Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(Suppl. 4): 73-86.
17. ™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 1157-1163.
18. Vercruyssen, M., Jacobs, R., van Assche, N. & van Steenberghe, D. (2008) The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 35: 454-474.
19. Verstreken, K., van Cleynenbreugel, J., Marshal, G., Naert, I., Suetens, P. & van Steenberghe, D. (1996) Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: A 3-dimensional approach. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 11: 806-810.
20. Wittwer, G., Adeyemo, W.L., Schicho, K., Birkfellner, W. & Enislidis, G. (2007) Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 22: 785-790.