Using information scent and need for cognition to understand online search behavior

SIGIR 2014 - Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 557-566

  Wu, Wan Ching ^a   Kelly, Diane ^a   Sud, Avneesh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

Author keywords

Information scent; Need for cognition; Pagination; Personality; Query reformulation; Search behavior; Search depth; Search stopping; Search strategies

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEARCH ENGINES;

INFORMATION SCENT; NEED FOR COGNITIONS; PAGINATION; PERSONALITY; QUERY REFORMULATION; SEARCH BEHAVIOR; SEARCH DEPTH; SEARCH STOPPING; SEARCH STRATEGIES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84904564683     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609626     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Anick, P. (2003). Using terminological feedback for Web search refinement - A log-based Study. In Proceedings of SIGIR'03, 88-95.
2. Azzopardi, L., Kelly, D., & Brennan, K. (2013). How query cost affects search behavior. In Proceedings of SIGIR'13, 23-32.
3. Bailey, J. (1997). Need for cognition and response mode in the active construction of an information domain. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(1), 69-85.
4. Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8(3), 152.
5. Browne, G., & Pitts, M. (2004). Stopping rule use during information search in design problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 208-224.
6. Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Review, 119(2), 197-253.
7. Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., & Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
8. Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., & Morris, K. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.
9. Card, S., Pirolli, P., Van Der Wege, M. M., Morrison, J. B., Reeder, R. W., Shraedley, P. K., & Boshart, J. (2001). Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In Proceedings of CHI, 498-505.
10. Chi, E. H, Pirolli, P., Chen, K., & Pitkow, J. E. (2001). Using information scent to model searcher needs and actions on the web. In Proceeding of CHI, (CHI Letters), 3(1), 490-497.
11. Chi, E. H, Pirolli, P., & Pitkow, J. (2000). The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site. In Proceeding of CHI, 161-168.
12. Cooper, W. (1968). Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems. American Documentation, 19(1), 30-41.
13. Cooper, W. S. (1973). On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness part II. JASIS, 24(6), 413-424.
14. Cutrell, E., & Guan, Z. (2007). What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In Proceeding of CHI, 407-416.
15. Dostert, M., & Kelly, D. (2009). Searchers? stopping behaviors and estimates of recall. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 820-821.
16. Diriye, A., White, R. W., Buscher, G., & Dumais, S. T. (2012). Leaving so soon? Understanding and predicting Web search abandonment rationales. In Proceedings of CIKM, 1025-1034.
17. Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2001). The role of individual differences in Internet searching: An empirical study. JASIS&T, 52(12), 1049-1066.
18. Hassan, A., Shi, X., Craswell, N., & Ramsey, B. (2013). Beyond clicks: Query reformulation as a predictor of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of CIKM, 2019-2018.
19. Huang, J., & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2009). Analyzing and evaluating query reformulation strategies in web search logs. In Proceeding of CIKM, 77-86.
20. Huang, J., White, R. W., & Dumais, S. (2011). No clicks, no problem. In Proceeding of CHI, 1225-1234.
21. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D. L., & Spink, A. (2009). Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching, JASIS&T, 60(7), 1358-1371.
22. Jansen, B.J., & Spink, A. (2005). How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. IP&M, 42(1), 248-263.
23. Järvelin. K. & Kekäläinen, J. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4), 422-446.
24. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2005). Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 154-161.
25. Kammerer, Y., Wollny, E., Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2009). How authority-related epistemological beliefs and salience of source information influence the evaluation of Web search results-An eye tracking study. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2158-2163.
26. Kantor, P. B. (1987). A model for the stopping behavior of searchers of online systems. JASIS, 38(1), 211-214.
27. Kraft, D., & Lee, T. (1979). Stopping rules and their effect on expected search length. Information Processing and Management, 15(1), 47-58.
28. Lorigo, L., Haridasan, M., Brynjarsdóttir, H., Xia, L., Joachims, T., Gay, G., Granka, L., Pellacini, F., & Pan, B. (2008). Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. JASIS&T, 59(7), 1041-1052.
29. Loumakis, F., Stumpf, S., & Grayson, D. (2011). This image smells good: Effects of image information scent in search engine results pages. In Proceedings of CIKM, 11, 475-484.
30. Mansourian, Y., & Ford, N. (2007). Search persistence and failure on the web: a "bounded rationality" and "satisficing" analysis. Journal of Documentation, 63(5), 680-701.
31. Nickles, K. R., Curley, S. P., & Benson, P. G. (1995). Judgment-based and reasoning-based stopping rules in decision making under uncertainty. Working Paper, Wake Forest University.
32. Nov, O., Arazy, O., López, C., & Brusilovsky, P. (2013). Exploring personality-targeted UI design in online social participation systems. In Proceedings of CHI, 361-370
33. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643-675.
34. Prabha, C., Connaway, L. S., Olszewski, L., & Jenkins, L. R. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 74-89.
35. Rieh, S. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. JASIS&T, 53(2), 145-161.
36. Rieh, S.Y. and Xie, H. (2006). Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: the interactive information retrieval context. IP&M, 42(3), 751-768.
37. Scholer, F., Kelly, D., Wu, W. C., Lee, H. S., & Webber, W. (2013). The effect of threshold priming and need for cognition on relevance calibration and assessment. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 623-632.
38. Smith, C. L., Kantor, P. B., & Street, H. (2008). User adaptation : Good results from poor systems. In Proceedings SIGIR, 144-154.
39. Spink, A., Jansen, B. J., & Ozmultu, H. C. (2000). Use of query reformulation and relevance feedback by Excite users. Internet Research, 10(4), 317-328.
40. Toms, E., & Freund, L. (2009). Predicting stopping behaviour: A preliminary analysis. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 750-751.
41. Vittinghoff, E. (2012). Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. Boston: Springer.
42. White, R. W., & Dumais, S. T. (2009). Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior. In Proceedings of CIKM, 87-96.
43. Wu, W.C., Kelly, D., Edwards, A. & Arguello, J. Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and NASCAR: Evaluation of search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity. Poster presented in the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium (IIiX?2012).
44. Zach, L. (2005). When is "enough" enough? Modeling the information-seeking and stopping behavior of senior arts administrators. JASIS&T, 56(1), 23-35.