This image smells good: Effects of image information scent in search engine results pages

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 475-483

  Loumakis, Faidon ^a   Stumpf, Simone ^b   Grayson, David ^a  

^a Fluent Interaction Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

images; information foraging; information scent; search engine results pages; usability; visual search

Indexed keywords

IMAGES; INFORMATION FORAGING; INFORMATION SCENT; SEARCH ENGINE RESULTS PAGES; USABILITY; VISUAL SEARCH;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 83055181760     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2063576.2063649     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Blackmon, M.H., Polson, P.G., Kitajima, M., and Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the web. Proceedings of CHI 2002.
2. Borlund P. 2003. The concept of relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology. 54(10):913-925.
3. Broder, A. 2002. A taxonomy of Web search. SIGIR Forum,36(2).
4. Buscher, G., Dumais, S.T., and Cutrell, E. 2010. The good, the bad, and the random: An Eye-Tracking study of Ad Quality in Web Search. Proceedings of SIGIR 2010.
5. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., Chen, K., and Pitkow, J. 2001. Using information scent to model user information needs and actions on the web, Proceedings of CHI 2001.
6. Chi, E., Rosien, A., Supattanasiri, G., Williams, A., Royer, C., Chow, C., Robles, E., Dalal, B., Chen, J. and Cousins, S. 2003. The Bloodhound Project: Automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScent Simulator. Proceedings of CHI 2003.
7. Chi, E.H., Pirolli, P., and Pitkow, J. 2000. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a web site. Proceedings of CHI 2000.
8. Cunningham SJ, Masoodian M. 2006. Looking for a picture: an analysis of everyday image information searching. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: ACM 2006. p. 198-199.
9. Cutrell, E. and Guan, Z. 2007. What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. Proceedings of CHI 2007.
10. Fu, W-T. and Pirolli, P. 2007. SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of HCI 2007.
11. Jiao, B., Yang, L., Xu, J., and Wu, F. 2010. Visual Summarizations of web pages. Proceedings of SIGIR 2010.
12. Katz, M. A., and Byrne, M. D. 2003. Effects of scent and breadth on use of site specific search on e-commerce web sites. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,10(3).
13. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., and Polson, P. 2005. Cognitive architecture for website design and usability evaluation: Comprehension of information scent in performing by exploration. Proceedings of HCI International2005.
14. Al Maqbali, H., Scholer, F., Thom, J.A., and Wu, M. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of visual summaries for web search. Proceedings of the Australasian Document Computing Symposium.
15. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. 1995. Information Foraging in information access environments. Proceedings of CHI 1995.
16. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. 1999. Information Foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4).
17. Pirolli, P., Card, S., and Van Der Wege, M. 2001. Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization. Proceedings of CHI 2001.
18. Pirolli, P. and Fu, W-T. 2003. SNIF-ACT: A model of information foraging on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of User Modeling 2003.
19. Pirolli, P. 2007. Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information, Oxford University Press, NewYork.
20. Rele, R.S. and Duchowski, A.T. 2005. Using eye tracking to evaluate alternate search results interfaces. Proceedings ofHFES.
21. Tamborello II, F. P. and Byrne, M. D. 2005. Information Search: The intersection of visual and semantic space. Proceedings of CHI 2005.
22. Wen L, Ruthven I, Borlund P.2006. The effects on topic familiarity on online search behaviour and use of relevance criteria. Advances in Information Retrieval 2006 456-459. (Pubitemid 44029486)
23. Westman, S. 2009. Image Users' Needs and Searching Behaviour. Information Retrieval: Searching in the 21st Century, Goker and Davies (eds.), Wiley.
24. Withrow, J. 2002. Do your links stink? Techniques for good web information scent. American Society for Information Science and Technology Bulletin, 28(5).
25. Woodruf, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J.B., Faulring, A., and Pirolli, P. 2001. A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(20).
26. Woodruf, A., Faulring, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J.B., and Pirolli, P. 2001. Using thumbnails to search the web. Proceedings of CHI 2001