Tests of the kin selection model of mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in satin bowerbirds

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1005-1014

  Reynolds, Sheila M ^a,b   Uy, J Albert C ^c,d   Patricelli, Gail L ^c,e   Coleman, Seth W ^a   Braun, Michael J ^a,b,c   Borgia, Gerald ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^c University of Maryland   (United States)

^d University of Miami   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

bowerbirds; inbreeding avoidance; kin selection; leks; mate choice; outbreeding; relatedness; sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904561304     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru065     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alho JS, Teplitsky C, Mills JA, Yarrall J W, Merila J. 2012. No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls. Behav Ecol. 23:672-675.
2. Barber CA, Edwards MJ, Robertson RJ. 2005. A test of the genetic compatibility hypothesis with tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Can J Zool. 83:955-961.
3. Barnard CJ, Fitzsimons J. 1988. Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: the efects of kinship, familiarity and interference on intersexual selection. Anim Behav. 36:1078-1090.
4. Bateson P. 1982. Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature. 295:236-237.
5. Bateson P. 1983. Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson P, editor. Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 257-278.
6. Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Vonschantz T. 1994. Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure- nonincestuous inbreeding in the great reed warbler. Evolution. 48:317-326.
7. Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Kupper C, Cuthill IC, Kis J, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK, Szekely T, Wallander J, Kempenaers B. 2002. Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature. 419:613-615.
8. Bohank AJ. 1999. Dispersal, gene fow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol. 74:21-45.
9. Borgia G. 1985. Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis. Anim Behav. 33:266-271.
10. Borgia G. 1995. Why do bowerbirds build bowers? Am Sci. 83:542-547.
11. Burley N, Monir C, Strachan C. 1990. Social preference of zebra fnches for siblings, cousins and non-kin. Anim Behav. 39:775-784.
12. Cendes LM. 2009. Active female sampling of male display predicts female uncertainty in mate choice. College Park (MD): University of Maryland. p. 23.
13. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:237-268.
14. Clarke A, Saether B, Roskraft E. 1997. Sex biases in avian dispersal: a reappraisal. Oikos. 79:429-438.
15. Cohen LB, Dearborn DC. 2004. Great frigatebirds, Fregata minor, choose mates that are genetically similar. Anim Behav. 68:1229-1236.
16. Coleman S W, Patricelli GL, Borgia G. 2004. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature. 428:742-745.
17. Dawkins R. 1979. Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Z Tierpsychol. 51:184-200.
18. Duarte LC, Bouteiller C, Fontanillas P, Petit E, Perrin N. 2003. Inbreeding avoidance in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula. Evolution. 57:638-645.
19. Eimes JA, Parker PG, Brown JL, Brown ER. 2005. Extrapair fertilization and genetic similarity of social mates in the Mexican jay. Behav Ecol. 16:456-460.
20. Favre L, Balloux F, Goudet J, Perrin N. 1997. Female-biased dispersal in the monogamous mammal Crocidura russula: evidence from feld data and microsatellite patterns. Proc Biol Sci. 264:127-132.
21. Francisco MR, Gibbs HL, Galetti M, Lunardi VO, Galetti PM Jr. 2007. Genetic structure in a tropical lek-breeding bird, the blue manakin (Chiroxiphia caudata) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Ecol. 16:4908-4918.
22. Freeman-Gallant CR, Wheelwright N T, Meiklejohn KE, Sollecito S V. 2006. Genetic similarity, extra-pair paternity, and offspring quality in savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis). Behav Ecol. 17:952-958.
23. Gibbons JD, Pratt J W. 1975. P values: interpretation and methodology. Am Stat. 29:20-25.
24. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P. 2002. Tests for sex-biased dispersal using biparentally inherited genetic markers. Mol Ecol. 11:1103-1114.
25. Jaimeson IG, Taylor SS, Tracy LN, Kokko H, Armstrong D P. 2009. Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks. Behav Ecol. 20:575-584.
26. Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding efects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:230-241.
27. Kempenaers B. 2007. Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the het-erozygosity theory. Adv Stud Behav. 37:189-278.
28. Kempenaers B, Adriaensen F, Dhondt AA. 1998. Inbreeding and divorce in blue and great tits. Anim Behav. 56:737-740.
29. Kleven O, Jacobsen F, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld J T. 2005. Extrapair mating between relatives in the barn swallow: a role for kin selection? Biol Lett. 1:389-392.
30. Kokko H, Ots I. 2006. When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution. 60:467-475.
31. Krause E T, Krüger O, Kohlmeier P, Caspers BA. 2012. Olfactory kin recognition in a songbird. Biol Lett. 8:327-329.
32. Krokene C, Lifjeld J T. 2000. Variation in the frequency of extra-pair paternity in birds: a comparison of an island and a mainland population of blue tits. Behaviour. 137:1317-1330.
33. Leclaire S, Merkling T, Raynaud C, Mulard H, Bessiere J, Lhuillier E, Hatch SA, Danchin E. 2012. Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion refect genetic make-up in a seabird species. P Roy SocLond B. 279:1185-1193.
34. Lehmann L, Perrin N. 2003. Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal. Am Nat. 162:638-652.
35. Manly B F. 1997. Randomisation, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall.
36. Mays HL Jr, Albrecht T, Liu M, Hill GE. 2008. Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review. Genetica. 134:147-158.
37. Nicholls JA, Austin JJ. 2005. Phylogeography of an east Australian wet-forest bird, the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), derived from mt DNA, and its relationship to morphology. Mol Ecol. 14:1485-1496.
38. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol. 4:347-354.
39. Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual confict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. p. 123-166.
40. Peacock MM, Smith AT. 1997. Nonrandom mating in pikas Ochotona prin-ceps: evidence for inbreeding between individuals of intermediate related-ness. Mol Ecol. 6:801-811.
41. Pusey A, Wolf M. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:201-206.
42. Puurtinen M. 2011. Mate choice for optimal (k) inbreeding. Evolution. 65:1501-1505.
43. Queller D, Goodnight K F. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution. 43:258-275.
44. Ratti O, Hovi M, Lundberg A, Tegelstrom H, Alatalo RV. 1995. Extrapair paternity and male characteristics in the pied fycatcher. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 37:419-425.
45. Reynolds SM, Christman MC, Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Braun MJ, Borgia G. 2009. Lekking satin bowerbird males aggregate with relatives to mitigate aggression. Behav Ecol. 20:410-415.
46. Reynolds SM, Dryer K, Bollback J, Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Robson T, Borgia G, Braun M. 2007. Behavioral paternity predicts genetic paternity in Satin Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), a species with a non-resource-based mating system. Auk. 124:857-867.
47. Richard M, Losdat S, Lecomte J, de Fraipont M, Clobert J. 2009. Optimal level of inbreeding in the common lizard. P Roy SocLond B. 276:2779-2786.
48. Robinson S P, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW. 2012. Preference for related mates in the fruit fy, Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav. 84:1169-1176.
49. Ryder TB, Tori W P, Blake JG, Loiselle BA, Parker PG. 2010. Mate choice for genetic quality: a test of the heterozygosity and compatibility hypotheses in a lek-breeding bird. Behav Ecol. 21:203-210.
50. Schjørring S, Jäger I. 2007. Incestuous mate preference by a simultaneous hermaphrodite with strong inbreeding depression. Evolution. 61:423-430.
51. Smith RH. 1979. On selection for inbreeding in polygynous animals. Heredity. 43:205-211.
52. Sommer S. 2005. Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in a monogamous rodent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58:181-189.
53. Strandh M, Westerdahl H, Pontarp M, Canbäck B, Dubois M P, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bonadonna F. 2012. Major histocompatibility complex class II compatibility, but not class I, predicts mate choice in a bird with highly developed olfaction. Proc Biol Sci. 279:4457-4463.
54. Szulkin M, Stopher K V, Pemberton JM, Reid JM. 2013. Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? Trends Ecol Evol. 28:205-211.
55. Tarvin KA, Webster MS, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S. 2005. Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extrapair paternity in splendid fairy-wrens. Anim Behav. 70:945-955.
56. Thünken T, Bakker TC, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H. 2007. Active inbreeding in a cichlid fsh and its adaptive signifcance. Curr Biol. 17:225-229.
57. Thurin N, Aron S. 2009. Sib-mating in the ant Plagiolepis pygmaea: adaptative inbreeding? J Evol Biol. 22:2481-2487.
58. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol Ecol. 9:1013-1027.
59. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature. 415:71-73.
60. Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G. 2000. Dynamic mate searching tactic allows female Satin Bowerbirds to reduce searching. P Roy SocLond B. 267:251-256.
61. Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G. 2001. Complex mate searching in the Satin Bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Am Nat. 158:530-542.
62. Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Schenck T, Matthysen E. 2003. Seasonal and lifetime reproductive consequences of inbreeding in the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol. 14:165-174.
63. Wang C, Lu X. 2011. Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: driven by kin-selection? Mol Ecol. 20:2851-2863.
64. Waser PM, Austad SN, Keane B. 1986. When should animals tolerate inbreeding? Am Nat. 128:529-537.