Inbreeding in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 638-645

  Duarte, L C ^a   Bouteiller, C ^a   Fontanillas, P ^a   Petit, E ^a,b   Perrin, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

F statistics; Inbreeding depression; Kin recognition; Mate choice; Sex biased dispersal

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; KIN RECOGNITION; MATE CHOICE;

ANIMALIA; CROCIDURA RUSSULA; RUSSULA;

EID: 0037360491     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01555.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Ballou, J. D. 1997. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J. Hered. 88:169-178.
3. Balloux, F., J. Goudet, and N. Perrin. 1998. Breeding system and genetic variance in the monogamous, semi-social shrew, Crocidura russula. Evolution 52:1230-1235.
4. Bateson, P. P. G. 1983. Optimal outbreeding. Pp. 257-277 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
5. Bensch, S., D. Hasselquist, and T. von Schantz. 1994. Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure: nonincestuous inbreeding in the great reed warbler? Evolution 48:317-326.
6. Bensch, S., D. Hasselquist, B. Nielsen, and B. Hansson. 1998. Higher fitness for philopatric than for immigrant males in a semi-isolated population of great warblers. Evolution 52:877-883.
7. Berger, P. J., N. C. Negus, and M. Day. 1997. Recognition of kin and avoidance of inbreeding in the montane vole, Microtus montanus. J. Mammal. 78:1182-1186.
8. Bouteiller, C., and N. Perrin. 2000. Individual reproductive success and effective population size in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:701-705.
9. Brewer, B. A., R. C. Lacy, M. L. Foster, and G. Alaks. 1990. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J. Hered. 81:257-266.
10. Brooker, M. G., I. Rowley, M. Adams, and P. R. Baverstock. 1990. Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:191-199.
11. Brown, J. L., and E. R. Brown. 1998. Are inbred offspring less fit? Survival in a natural populations on Mexican jays. Behav. Ecol. 9:60-63.
12. Bull, C. M., and S. J. B. Cooper. 1999. Relatedness and inbreeding avoidance in the lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46:367-372.
13. Cantoni, D., and P. Vogel. 1989. Social organization and mating systems of free-ranging greater white-toothed shrews, Crocidura russula. Anim. Behav. 38:205-214.
14. Chen, X. 1993. Comparison of inbreeding and outbreeding in hermaphroditic Arianta arbustorum (L) (land snail). Heredity 71:456-461.
15. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1989. Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature 337:70-71.
16. Coltman, D. W., W. D. Bowen, and J. M. Wright. 1998. Birth weight and neonatal survival of harbour seal pups are positively correlated with genetic variation measured by microsatellites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:803-809.
17. Coulson, T. N., J. M. Pemberton, S. D. Albon, M. Beaumont, T. C. Marshall, J. Slate, F. E. Guinness, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1998. Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:489-495.
18. Craig, J. L., and I. G. Jamieson. 1988. Incestuous mating in a communal bird: a family affair. Am. Nat. 131:58-70.
19. Crnokrak, P., and D. A. Roff. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260-270.
20. Danzman, R. G. 1997. PROBMAX: a computer program for assigning unknown parentage in pedigree analysis from known genotypic pools of parents and progeny. J. Hered. 88:333.
21. Dobson, F. S. 1982. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim. Behav. 30:1183-1192.
22. Favre, L., and F. Balloux. 1997. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the greater white-toothed shrew Crocidura russula. Mol. Ecol. 6:595-596.
23. Favre, L., F. Balloux, J. Goudet, and N. Perrin. 1997. Female-biased dispersal in the monogamous mammal Crocidura russula: evidence from field data and microsatellite patterns. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:127-132.
24. Gandon, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2001. Multiple causes of the evolution of dispersal. Pp. 155-167 in J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols, eds. Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. Genoud, M. 1985. Ecological energetics of two European shrews: Crocidura russula and Sorex coronatus (Soricidae, Mammalia). J. Zool., Lond. (A) 207:63-85.
26. Genoud, M., and J. Hausser. 1979. Ecologie d'une population de Crocidura russula en milieu rural montagnard. Terre Vie Rev Ecol. 33:509-554.
27. Genoud, M., and P. Vogel. 1990. Energy requirements during reproduction and reproductive effort in shrews (Soricidae). J. Zool. Lond. 220:41-60.
28. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86:485-486.
29. Gibbs, L. H., and P. R. Grant. 1989. Inbreeding in Darwin's medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis). Evolution 43:1273-1284.
30. Goodnight, K. F., and D. C. Queller. 1999. Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relations using genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 8:1231-1234.
31. Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28:1140-1162.
32. Greenwood, P. J., and P. H. Harvey. 1978. Inbreeding and dispersal in the great tit. Nature 271:52-54.
33. Hamilton, W. D. 1971. Selection of selfing and altruistic behavior in some extreme models. Pp. 57-91 in J. F. Eisenberg and W. S. Dillon, eds. Man and beast: comparative social behavior. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
34. Harvey, P. H., and K. Ralls. 1986. Do animals avoid incest? Nature 320:575-576.
35. Hedrick, P. W., and S. T. Kalinowski. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:139-162.
36. Jamieson, A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim. Genet. 25:37-44.
37. Jimenez, J. A., K. A. Hughes, G. Alaks, L. Graham, and R. C. Lacy. 1994. An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266:271-273.
38. Johnson, M., and M. Gaines. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:449-480.
39. Keane, B., S. R. Creel, and P. Waser. 1996. No evidence of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding depression in a social carnivore. Behav. Ecol. 7:480-489.
40. Keller, L. F., 1998. Inbreeding and its fitness effects in an insular population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 52:240-250.
41. Keller, L. F., and P. Arcese. 1998. No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a natural population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Am. Nat. 152:380-392.
42. Keller, L. F., and D. M. Waller. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:230-241.
43. Keller, L. F., P. Arcese, J. M. Smith, W. M. Hochachka, and S. Stearns. 1994. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372:356-357.
44. Komdeur, J., and B. J. Hatchwell. 1999. Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:237-241.
45. Koprowski, J. L. 1996. Natal philopatry, communal nesting, and kinship in fox squirrels and grey squirrels. J. Mammal. 77:1006-1016.
46. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
47. Madsen, T., B. Stille, and R. Shine. 1996. Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus. Biol. Conserv. 75:113-118.
48. Madsen, T., R. Shine, M. Olsson, and H. Wittzells. 1999. Restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 402:34-35.
49. Miller, S. A., D. D. Dykes, and H. F. Polesky. 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucl. Acids Res. 16:1215.
50. Nei, M. T. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
51. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström. 1996. Malformed offspring, sibling matings, and selection against inbreeding in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J. Evol. Biol. 9:229-242.
52. Parker, G. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166 in M. B. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
53. _. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. Pp. 141-164 in P. P. G. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
54. Pärt, T. 1994. Male philopatry confers a mating advantage in the migratory collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Anim. Behav. 48:401-409.
55. _. 1996. Problems with testing inbreeding avoidance: the case of the collared flycatcher. Evolution 50:1625-1630.
56. Perrin, N., and J. Goudet. 2001. Inbreeding, kinship and the evolution of natal dispersal. Pp. 123-142 in J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols, eds. Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
57. Perrin, N., and V. Mazalov. 2000. Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Am. Nat. 155:116-127.
58. Pusey, A. E. 1987. Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:295-299.
59. Pusey, A., and M. Wolf. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:201-206.
60. Ralls, K., P. H. Harvey, and A. M. Lyles. 1986. Inbreeding in natural populations of birds and mammals. Pp. 35-56 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
61. Reeve, H. K., D. F. Westneat, W. A. Noon, P. W. Sherman, and C. F. Aquadro. 1990. DNA fingerprinting reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2496-2500.
62. Rowley, I., E. Russell, and M. Brooker. 1986. Inbreeding benefits may outweigh costs. Anim. Behav. 34:939-941.
63. Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly population. Nature 392:491-494.
64. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2d ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
65. Say, L., D. Pontier, and E. Natoli. 2001. Influence of oestrus synchronization on male reproductive success in the domestic cat (Felis catus L.) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1049-1053.
66. Shields, W. M. 1982. Philopatry, inbreeding and the evolution of sex. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
67. _. 1983. Optimal inbreeding and the evolution of philopatry. Pp. 132-159 in I. R. Swingland and P. J. Greenwood, eds. The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
68. Smith, R. H. 1979. On selection for inbreeding in polygynous animals. Heredity 43:205-211.
69. Stockley, P., J. B. Searle, D. W. Macdonald, and C. S. Jones. 1993. Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254:173-179.
70. Templeton, A. R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. Pp. 105-116 in M. Soulé, ed. Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
71. Van Noordwijk, A. J., and W. Scharloo. 1981. Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution 35:674-688.
72. Vogel, P. 1999. Colonisation capacity of the greater white-toothed shrew Crocidura russula: an experimental study. Säugetierk. Mitteil. 44:37-47.
73. Waser, P. M., S. N. Austad, and B. Keane. 1986. When should animals tolerate inbreeding? Am. Nat. 128:529-537.
74. Watson, A., R. Moss, R. Parr, M. D. Mountford, and P. Rothery. 1994. Kin landownership, differential aggression between kin and non-kin, and population fluctuations in red grouse. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:39-50.
75. Westemeier, R. L., J. D. Brawn, S. A. Simpson, T. L. Esker, R. W. Jansen, J. W. Walk, E. L. Kershner, J. L. Bouzat, and K. N. Paige. 1998. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282:1695-1698.
76. Wiener, P., and W. Feldman. 1993. The effect of the mating system on the evolution of migration in a spatially heterogeneous population. Evol. Ecol. 7:251-269.