Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning

Human Movement Science

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 12-20

  Wulf, Gabriele ^a   Chiviacowsky, Suzete ^b   Cardozo, Priscila Lopes ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Fundamental psychological needs; Motivation; Self controlled practice; Self efficacy; Throwing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUTONOMY SUPPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENHANCED EXPECTANCY; EXPECTATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; THROWING; BIOMECHANICS; DECISION MAKING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84904553111     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ávila L.T.G., Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2012, 13:849-853.
2. Badami R., VaezMousavi M., Wulf G., Namazizadeh M. Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:360-364.
3. Badami R., VaezMousavi M., Wulf G., Namazizadeh M. Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2012, 83:196-203.
4. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977, 84:191-215.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997, Freeman, NY.
6. Barker J.B., Jones M.V., Greenlees I. Assessing the immediate and maintained effects of hypnosis on self-efficacy and soccer wall-volley performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2010, 32:243-252.
7. Chen D.D., Hendrick J.L., Lidor R. Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2002, 43:69-86.
8. Chiviacowsky S. Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2014, 15:505-510.
9. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:408-415.
10. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2007, 78:40-47.
11. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Medeiros F., Kaefer A., Tani G. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2008, 79:405-410.
12. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Wally R., Borges T. Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2009, 80:663-668.
13. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R., Campos T. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait & Posture 2012, 35:601-605.
14. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3. Article 458 (1-8).
15. Clark S.E., Ste-Marie D.M. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 2007, 25:577-586.
16. Cordova D.I., Lepper M.R. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:715-730.
17. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000, 11:227-268.
18. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology 2008, 49:182-185.
19. Feltz D.L., Chow D.M., Hepler T.J. Path analysis of self-efficacy and diving performance revisited. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2008, 30:401-411.
20. Hartman J.M. Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2007, 104:1005-1016.
21. Henry R.A. The effects of choice and incentives on the overestimation of future performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 57:210-225.
22. Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.04.005.
23. Hutchinson J.C., Sherman T., Martinovic N., Tenenbaum G. The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 2008, 20:457-472.
24. Jalene S., Wulf G. Brief hypnotic intervention increases throwing accuracy. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 2014, 9:199-206.
25. Janelle C.M., Barba D.A., Frehlich S.G., Tennant L.K., Cauraugh J.H. Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1997, 68:269-279.
26. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32:311-328.
27. Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2014). Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Lewthwaite R., Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:738-749.
29. Lewthwaite R., Wulf G. Motor learning through a motivational lens. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory & practice 2012, 173-191. Routledge, London. 2nd ed. N.J. Hodges, A.M. Williams (Eds.).
30. Moritz S.E., Feltz D.L., Fahrbach K., Mack D. The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000, 71:280-294.
31. Pascua L.A.M., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences 2014, 10.1080/02640414.2014.922693.
32. Patterson J.T., Carter M. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:214-227.
33. Patterson J.T., Carter M., Sanli E. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:624-633.
34. Post P., Fairbrother J.T., Barros J.A., Kulpa J.D. Self-controlled practice within a fixed time period facilitates the learning of a basketball set shot. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 2014, 2:9-15.
35. Reeve J., Tseng C.M. Cortisol reactivity to a teacher's motivating style: The biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and Emotion 2011, 35:63-74.
36. Saemi E., Wulf G., Varzaneh A.G., Zarghami M. Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte (Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport) 2011, 25:671-679.
37. Saemi E., Porter J.M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh A., Zarghami M., Maleki F. Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2012, 13:378-382.
38. Sanli E.A., Patterson J.T., Bray S.R., Lee T.D. Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 3. Article 611 (1-17).
39. Sheldon K.M., Filak V. Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 47:267-283.
40. Stevens D., Anderson D.I., O'Dwyer N.J., Williams A.M. Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills?. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:1122-1128.
41. Stoate I., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sports Sciences 2012, 30:815-823.
42. Tafarodi R.W., Milne A.B., Smith A.J. The confidence of choice: Evidence for an augmentation effect on self-perceived performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1999, 25:1405-1416.
43. Trempe M., Sabourin M., Proteau L. Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38:52-60.
44. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007, 93:96-101.
45. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2013, 6:77-104.
46. Wulf G., Chiviacowsky S., Lewthwaite R. Normative feedback effects on the learning of a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2010, 81:425-431.
47. Wulf G., Chiviacowsky S., Lewthwaite R. Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging 2012, 27:14-21.
48. Wulf G., Clauss A., Shea C.H., Whitacre C. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2001, 72:299-303.
49. Wulf G., Freitas H.E., Tandy R.D. Choosing to exercise more: Small choices can increase exercise behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2014, 15:268-271.
50. Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. Effortless attention: A new perspective in attention and action 2010, 75-101. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. B. Bruya (Ed.).
51. Wulf G., Lewthwaite R., Hooyman A. Can ability conceptualizations alter the impact of social comparison in motor learning?. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 2013, 1:20-30.
52. Wulf G., Raupach M., Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2005, 76:107-111.
53. Wulf G., Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1999, 70:265-272.