Partners' personality types and mate preferences: Predation risk matters

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 723-733

  Teyssier, Aimeric ^a,b,c   Bestion, Elvire ^d   Richard, Murielle ^d   Cote, Julien ^a,b  

^a Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d Station d'Ecologie Expérimentale de Moulis CNRS USR293 Route du CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

common lizards; mate choice; pace of life syndrome; predation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904544425     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru049     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andersson M, Simmons LW. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:296-302.
2. Ariyomo TO, Watt PJ. 2013. Disassortative mating for boldness decreases reproductive success in the guppy. Behav Ecol. doi: 10.1093/beheco/art070.
3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. 2013. lme4: linear mixed-efects models using S4 classes, R package, version 0.999999-0, 2012. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
4. Bauwens D, Van Damme R, Verheyen F. 1989. Synchronisation of spring molting with the onset of mating behavior in male lizards, Lacerta vivipara. J Herpetol. 23:89-91.
5. Bauwens D, Verheyen RF. 1985. The timing of reproduction in lizard Lacerta vivipara: diferences between individual females. J Herpetol. 19:353-364.
6. Beauchamp G. 2000. Individual diferences in activity and exploration infuence leadership in pairs of foraging zebra fnches. Behaviour. 137:301-314.
7. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav. 77:771-783.
8. Boon AK, Reale D, Boutin S. 2008. Personality, habitat use, and their consequences for survival in North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hud-sonicus. Oikos. 117:1321-1328.
9. Both C, Dingemanse NJ, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM. 2005. Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success. J Anim Ecol. 74:667-674.
10. Budaev S V, Zworykin DD, Mochek AD. 1999. Individual diferences in parental care and behaviour profle in the convict cichlid: a correlation study. Anim Behav. 58:195-202.
11. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Reale D. 2008. Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos. 117:641-653.
12. Cote J, Clobert J. 2007. Social personalities infuence natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 274:383-390.
13. Cote J, Clobert J, Brodin T, Fogarty S, Sih A. 2010. Personality- dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Phil Trans R Soc B. 365:4065-4076.
14. Cote J, Dreiss A, Clobert J. 2008. Social personality trait and ftness. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 275:2851-2858.
15. Cote J, Fogarty S, Tymen B, Sih A, Brodin T. 2013. Personality-dependent dispersal cancelled under predation risk. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 280.
16. Cote J, Le Galliard J-F, Rossi J-M, Fitze PS. 2008. Environmentally induced changes in carotenoid-based coloration of female lizards: a comment on Vercken et al. J Evol Biol. 21:1165-1172.
17. van Damme R, Bauwens D, Thoen C, Vanderstighelen D, Verheyen RF. 1995. Responses of naive lizards to predator chemical cues. J Herpetol. 29:38-43.
18. van Damme R, Bauwens D, Vanderstighelen D, Verheyen RF. 1990. Responses of the lizard Lacerta vivipara to predator chemical cues: the efects of temperature. Anim Behav. 40:298-305.
19. David M, Auclair Y, Cézilly F. 2011. Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra fnches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Anim Behav. 81:219-224.
20. David M, Cézilly F. 2011. Personality may confound common measures of mate-choice. PLoS One. 6:e24778.
21. Depeiges A, Force A, Dufaure J-P. 1987. Production and glycosylation of sperm constitutive proteins in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Evolution during the reproductive period. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Comp Biochem. 86:233-240.
22. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM. 2004. Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fuctuating environment. Proc Biol Sci. 271:847-852.
23. Downes S. 2002. Does responsiveness to predator scents afect lizard survivorship? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 52:38-42.
24. Fitze PS, Cote J, Clobert J. 2010. Mating order-dependent female mate choice in the polygynandrous common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Oecologia. 162:331-341.
25. Fitze PS, Cote J, Martinez-Rica J P, Clobert J. 2008. Determinants of male ftness: disentangling intra-and inter-sexual selection. J Evol Biol. 21:246-255.
26. Fitze PS, Cote J, San-Jose LM, Meylan S, Isaksson C, Andersson S, Rossi JM, Clobert J. 2009. Carotenoid-based colours refect the stress response in the common lizard. PLoS One. 4:e5111.
27. Fitze PS, Le Galliard J-F, Federici P, Richard M, Clobert J. 2005. Confict over multiple partner mating among males and females of polygynan-drous common lizards. Evolution. 59:2451-2459.
28. Giesing ER, Suski CD, Warner RE, Bell AM. 2011. Female sticklebacks transfer information via eggs: efects of maternal experience with predators on ofspring. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 278:1753-1759.
29. Godin JG, Dugatkin LA. 1996. Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:10262-10267.
30. Godin J-GJ, Briggs SE. 1996. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim Behav. 51:117-130.
31. Gong A, Gibson RM. 1996. Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav. 52:1007-1015.
32. Jackson DA. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology. 74:2204-2214.
33. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev. 72:283-327.
34. Johnson JB, Basolo AL. 2003. Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav Ecol. 14:619-625.
35. Kalinowski S T, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
36. Koga T, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH. 1998. Elevated predation risk changes mating behaviour and courtship in a fddler crab. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 265:1385-1390.
37. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MA, Blokhuis HJ. 1999. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 23:925-935.
38. Krause J, Ruxton GD. 2002. Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Laloi D, Eizaguirre C, Fédérici P, Massot M. 2011. Female choice for heterozygous mates changes along successive matings in a lizard. Behav Process. 88:149-154.
40. Laloi D, Richard M, Lecomte J, Massot M, Clobert J. 2004. Multiple paternity in clutches of common lizard Lacerta vivipara: data from microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol. 13:719-723.
41. Le Galliard J-F, Paquet M, Cisel M, Montes-Poloni L. 2013. Personality and the pace-of-life syndrome: variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances. Funct Ecol. 27:136-144.
42. Legrand D, Guillaume O, Baguette M, Cote J, Trochet A, Calvez O, Zajitschek S, Zajitschek F, Lecomte J, Benard Q, et al. 2012. The Metatron: an experimental system to study dispersal and metaecosystems for terrestrial organisms. Nat Meth. 9:828-833.
43. Lelievre H, Legagneux P, Blouin-Demers G, Bonnet X, Lourdais O. 2012. Trophic niche overlap in two syntopic colubrid snakes (Hierophis viridifa-vus and Zamenis longissimus) with contrasted lifestyles. Amphibia-Reptilia. 33:37-44.
44. Meyer K. 2007. WOMBAT-a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 8:815-821.
45. Møller A, Jennions M. 2001. How important are direct ftness benefts of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften. 88:401-415.
46. Moses JL, Sih A. 1998. Efects of predation risk and food availability on the activity, habitat use, feeding behavior and mating behavior of a pond water strider, Gerris marginatus (Hemiptera). Ethology. 104:661-669.
47. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev. 85:935-956.
48. Olsson M, Stuart-Fox D, Ballen C. 2013. Genetics and evolution of colour patterns in reptiles. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 24:529-541.
49. Pilakouta N, Alonzo SH. 2013. Predator exposure leads to a short-term reversal in female mate preferences in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus hel-leri. Behav Ecol. doi: 10.1093/beheco/art120.
50. Pocklington R, Dill LM. 1995. Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? Anim Behav. 49:1122-1124.
51. Punzo F. 2007. Chemosensory cues associated with snake predators afect locomotor activity and tongue fick rate in the whiptail lizard, Aspidoscelis dixoni Scudday 1973 (Squamata Teiidae). Ethol Ecol Evol. 19:225-235.
52. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
53. Reale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall P T, Dingemanse NJ. 2007. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev. 82:291-318.
54. Reale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio P-O. 2010. Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Phil Trans R Soc B. 365:4051-4063.
55. Richard M, Lecomte J, De Fraipont M, Clobert J. 2005. Age-specifc mating strategies and reproductive senescence. Mol Ecol. 14:3147-3155.
56. Richard M, Massot M, Clobert J, Meylan S. 2012. Litter quality and infammatory response are dependent on mating strategy in a reptile. Oecologia. 170:39-46.
57. Royle NJ, Schuett W, Dall SRX. 2010. Behavioral consistency and the resolution of sexual confict over parental investment. Behav Ecol. 21:1125-1130.
58. Schuett W, Dall SRX, Royle NJ. 2011. Pairs of zebra fnches with similar ̀personalities' make better parents. Anim Behav. 81:609-618.
59. Schuett W, Godin J-GJ, Dall SRX. 2011. Do female zebra fnches, Taeniopygia guttata, choose their mates based on their 'personality'? Ethology. 117:908-917.
60. Schuett W, Tregenza T, Dall SRX. 2010. Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol Rev. 85:217-246.
61. Sherif MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R. 2009. The sensitive hare: sublethal efects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. J Anim Ecol. 78:1249-1258.
62. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:372-378.
63. Sinn DL, Apiolaza LA, Moltschaniwskyj NA. 2006. Heritability and ftness-related consequences of squid personality traits. J Evol Biol. 19:1437-1447.
64. Smith BR, Blumstein D T. 2008. Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol. 19:448-455.
65. Stamps JA. 2007. Growth-mortality tradeofs and 'personality traits' in animals. Ecol Lett. 10:355-363.
66. Storm JJ, Lima SL. 2010. Mothers forewarn offspring about predators: a transgenerational maternal effect on behavior. Am Nat. 175:382-390.
67. Thoen C, Bauwens D, Verheyen R F. 1986. Chemoreceptive and behavioural responses of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara to snake chemical deposits. Anim Behav. 34:1805-1813.
68. White J, Richard M, Massot M, Meylan S. 2011. Cloacal bacterial diversity increases with multiple mates: evidence of sexual transmission in female common lizards. PLoS One. 6:e22339.
69. Wilson AJ, Réale D, Clements MN, Morrissey MM, Postma E, Walling CA, Kruuk LEB, Nussey DH. 2010. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol. 79:13-26.
70. Wolf M, van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ. 2007. Life-history trade-ofs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature. 447:581-584.
71. Zahavi A, editor. 1997. The handicap principle: a missing part of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.