Personality may confound common measures of Mate-Choice

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  David, Morgan ^a,b   Cézilly, Frank ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FINCH; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NONHUMAN; PERSONALITY; SEXUAL SELECTION; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA; ANIMAL; PHYSIOLOGY;

TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FINCHES; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PERSONALITY;

EID: 80052842465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024778     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andersson M, (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton Princeton University Press.
2. Andersson M, Simmons LW, (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 296-302.
3. Jones AG, Ratterman NL, (2009) Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? PNAS 106: 10001-10008.
4. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL, (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77: 771-783.
5. Wagner WE, (1998) Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55: 1029-1042.
6. Chaine AS, Lyon BE, (2008) Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319: 459-462.
7. Rutstein AN, Brazill-Boast J, Griffith SC, (2007) Evaluating mate choice in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 74: 1277-1284.
8. Narraway C, Hunt J, Wedell N, Hosken DJ, (2010) Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference. J Evol Biol 23: 2550-2557.
9. Shackleton MA, Jennions MD, Hunt J, (2005) Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58: 1-8.
10. Woodgate JL, Bennett ATD, Leitner S, Catchpole CK, Buchanan KL, (2010) Developmental stress and female mate choice behaviour in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 79: 1381-1390.
11. Heisler IL, Andersson MB, Arnold SJ, Boake CR, Borgia G, et al. (1987) The evolution of mating preferences and sexually selected traits: group report. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB, eds (1987) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Chichester John Wiley pp. 96-118.
12. Hunt J, Breuker CJ, Sadowski JA, Moore AJ, (2009) Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J Evol Biol 22: 13-26.
13. Collins SA, ten Cate C, (1996) Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches? Anim Behav 52: 105-112.
14. Brooks R, Endler JA, (2001) Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644-1655.
15. Smith BR, Blumstein DT, (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19: 448-455.
16. Dingemanse NJ, Wright J, Kazem AJ, Thomas DK, Hickling R, et al. (2007) Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback. J Anim Ecol 76: 1128-1138.
17. David M, Auclair Y, Cézilly F, (2011) Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Anim Behav 81: 219-224.
18. Schuett W, Tregenza T, Dall SRX, (2010) Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol Rev 85: 217-246.
19. Schuett W, Godin J-GJ, Dall SRX, Do female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, choose their mates based on their "personality"? Ethology.
20. David M, Cézilly F, Giraldeau L-A, (2011) Personality affects zebra finch feeding success in a producer-scrounger game. Anim Behav 82: 61-67.
21. David M, Auclair Y, Dechaume-Moncharmont FX, Cézilly F, Handling stress does not reflect personality in female zebra finches. J Comp Psychol (doi10.1037/a0024636).
22. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ, (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64: 929-938.
23. Forstmeier W, Birkhead TR, (2004) Repeatability of mate choice in the zebra finch: consistency within and between females. Anim Behav 68: 1017-1028.
24. Pearn SM, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, (2001) Ultraviolet vision, fluorescence and mate choice in a parrot, the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus. Proc Biol Sci 268: 2273-2279.
25. Hohoff C, Franzen K, Sascher N, (2003) Female choice in a promiscuous wild guinea pig, the yellow-toothed cavy (Galea musteloides). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53: 341-349.
26. Forstmeier W, (2004) Female resistance to male seduction in zebra finches. Anim Behav 68: 1005-1015.
27. Forstmeier W, (2007) Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair copulations? PLoS ONE 2 (9): e952.
28. Burley N, Krantzberg G, Radman P, (1982) Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. Anim Behav 30: 444-455.
29. Griggio M, Biard C, Penn DJ, Hoi H, (2011) Female house sparrows "count on" male genes: experimental evidence for MHC-dependent mate preference in birds. BMC Evol Biol 11: 44.
30. Martin P, Bateson, P, (1993) Measuring Behaviour: an Introductory Guide. 2nd edn Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
31. Forstmeier W, Coltman DW, Birkhead TR, (2004) Maternal effects influence the sexual behaviour of sons and daughters in the zebra finch. Evolution 58: 2574-2583.
32. Lessells CM, Boag PT, (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116-121.
33. Garamszegi LZ, Eens M, Török J, (2009) Behavioural syndromes and trappability in free-living collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis. Anim Behav 77: 803-812.
34. Ritschard M, Riebel K, Brumm H, (2010) Female zebra finches prefer high-amplitude song. Anim Behav 79: 877-883.
35. Calkins JD, Burley NT, (2003) Mate choice for multiple ornaments in the California quail, Callipepla californica. Anim Behav 65: 69-81.
36. Head ML, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R, (2005) The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol 3: e33.
37. Réale D, Reader S, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ, (2007) Integrating temperament in ecology and evolutionary biology. Biol Rev 82: 291-318.
38. Biro PA, Dingemanse NJ, (2009) Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 66-67.
39. Clobert J, (1995) Capture-recapture and evolutionary ecology: A difficult wedding? J Appl Stat 22: 989-1008.
40. Carere C, Drent PJ, Koolhaas JM, Groothuis TGG, (2005) Epigenetic effects on personality traits: early food provisioning and sibling competition. Behaviour 142: 1329-1355.
41. Burley NT, Foster VS, (2006) Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity. Anim Behav 72: 713-719.
42. Lehtonen TK, Lindström K, (2008) Repeatability of mating preferences in the sand goby. Anim Behav 75: 55-61.