Syntactic constraints on referential processing

Sentence Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 136-159

  Sturt, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904543312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203488454     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 23–54.
2. Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphora. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 748–769.
3. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.
4. Chien, Y. C., & Wexler, K. (2009). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1, 225–295.
5. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Foris.
6. Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in english: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 128–144.
7. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.
8. Clifton, C., Kennison, S. M., & Albrecht, J. E. (1997). Reading the words him and her. Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and on structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 276–292.
9. Dubey, A. (2010). The influence of discourse on syntax: A psycholinguistic model of sentence processing. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1179–1188), 11–16 July, Uppsala, Sweden.
10. Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse level cosntraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 571–603.
11. Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The on-line application of binding principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485–502.
12. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–430.
13. Guasti, M. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
14. Harris, T., Wexler, K., & Holcomb, P. (2000). An ERP investigation of binding and co-reference. Brain and Language, 75, 313–346.
15. Kaiser, E., Runner, J., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2009). Structural and semantic constraints on the resolution of pronouns and reflexives. Cognition, 112, 55–80.
16. Kazanina, N., Lau, E., Lieberman, M., Yoshida, M., & Phillips, C. (2007). The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 384–409.
17. Kazanina, N., & Phillips, C. (2010). Differential effects of constraints on the processing of Russian cataphora. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 371–400.
18. Kennison, S. M. (2003). Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 335–352.
19. Kreiner, H., Sturt, P., & Garrod, S. (2008). Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 239–261.
20. Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora discourse and empathy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lewis, R., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 1–45.
22. Martin, A., Nieuwland, M., & Carreiras, M. (2012). Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension. Neuroimage, 59, 1859–1869.
23. Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in co-reference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
24. Phillips, C., Wagers, M., & Lau, E. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 37, (pp. 153–186), Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications.
25. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA, and Chicago, IL: Csli and University of Chicago Press.
26. Reinhart, T. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
27. Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657–720.
28. Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Cognition, 81, B1–13.
29. Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Assigning referents to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases. Experimental tests of binding theory. Cognitive Science, 30, 1–49.
30. Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.
31. Sturt, P. (2003A). A new look at the syntax-discourse interface: The use of binding principles in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 125–139.
32. Sturt, P. (2003B). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 542–562.
33. Sturt, P., & Lombardo, V. (2005). Processing coordinate structures: Incrementality and connectedness. Cognitive Science, 29, 291–305.
34. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
35. Tenny, C. (2003). Short distance pronouns in representational noun phrases and a grammar of sentiece. Manuscript available at: Www.linguist.org.
36. Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 157–166.
37. Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 128–139.
38. Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types. Brain and Language, 108, 40–55.
39. Zribi Hertz, A. (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language, 65, 695–727.