Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 571-603

  Felser, Claudia ^a   Cunnings, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862171929     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716411000488     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748-769.
2. Büring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
5. Dallas, A., & Kaan, E. (2008). Second language processing of filler-gap dependencies by late learners. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 372-388.
6. Demirci, M. (2000). The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation by Turkish learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 325-353.
7. Demirci, M. (2001). Acquisition of binding of English reflexives by Turkish L2 learners: A neo-gricean pragmatic account. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 753-775.
8. Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The on-line application of Binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485-502.
9. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K.,&Ferraro,V. (2002).Good enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
10. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175-198.
11. Harris, T.,Wexler, K., & Holcomb, P. (2000). An ERP investigation of binding and coreference. Brain and Language, 75, 313-346.
12. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369-397.
14. Koornneef, A. (2008). Eye-catching anaphora. LOT Dissertation Series 90. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT
15. Lee, K.-Y. (2008). The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation in Korean learners of English. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
16. Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5-24.
17. McDonald, J. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgement performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381-401.
18. Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5-20.
19. Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (2003). The psycholinguistics of anaphora. In A. Barss (Ed.), Anaphora: A reference guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Reinhart, T. (1981). Definite NP anaphora and c-command. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 605-635.
21. Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
22. Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333-357.
23. Runner, J., Sussman, R., & Tanenhaus,M. (2003). Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Cognition, 89, B1-B13.
24. Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and online comprehension processes. In M. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542-562.
26. Townsend, D., & Bever, T. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain & Language, 108, 40-55.