Computer supported novice group critique

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 405-414

  Easterday, Matthew W ^a   Lewis, Daniel Rees ^a   Fitzpatrick, Colin ^a   Gerber, Elizabeth M ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer supported cooperative learning; Design education; Group critique; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE LEARNING; DESIGN EDUCATION; DUAL CHANNEL; GROUNDED THEORY; GROUP CRITIQUE; INTERACTIVITY; LEARNING COSTS; PEER ASSESSMENT;

GROUP THEORY;

EID: 84904497021     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2598510.2600889     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., Van Merriënboer, J.: Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction. 20(4), 270-279 (2010)
2. Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., Schunn, C.: Peerbased computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM. 51(3), 83-88 (2008)
3. Dannels, D. P., Martin, K. N.: Critiquing critiques a genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 22(2), 135-159 (2008)
4. Tohidi, M., Buxton, W., Baecker, R., Sellen, A.: Getting the right design and the design right. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 1243-1252. (2006)
5. Amabile, T. M.: Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School. 5(9), 396-239 (1996)
6. Buxton, B.: Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)
7. Moggridge, B., Smith, G. C.: Designing interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2007)
8. Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm. Crown Business, New York (2001)
9. Lande, M., Leifer, L.: Difficulties student engineers face designing the future. International Journal of Engineering Education. 26(2), 271-277 (2010)
10. Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research. 68(3), 249-276 (1998)
11. van Gennip, N. A., Segers, M. S., Tillema, H. H.: Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review. 4(1), 41-54 (2009)
12. Panadero, E., Romero, M., Strijbos, J.-W.: The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 39(4), 195-203 (2013)
13. Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., Dünnebier, K.: Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and instruction. 20(4), 291-303 (2010)
14. Kollar, I., Fischer, F.: Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction. 20(4), 344-348 (2010)
15. Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and social psychology. 53(3), 497-509 (1987)
16. Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E.: Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. 13(1991), 127-149 (1991)
17. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., Cooper, W. H.: Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(1), 137-142 (1991)
18. Ramirez, A., Wang, Z.: When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication. 58(1), 20-39 (2008)
19. Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P.: Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-based social design. MIT Press (2012)
20. Lampe, C., Johnston, E.: Follow the (Slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, pp. 11-20. (2005)
21. Bēhance. [Web page]. http://www.behance.net/.
22. Zurb: Forrst. [Web page]. http://forrst.com/posts.
23. Dribbble. [Web page]. http://dribbble.com/.
24. Swrm. [Web page]. Retrieved from http://swrm.io/.
25. Collins, A.: Toward a Design Science of Education. In: Scanlon, E., O'Shea, T. (eds.) New Directions in Educational Technology, pp. 15-22. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1992)
26. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 493-502. (2007)
27. Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D., Gerber, E.: Formative feedback in Digital Lofts: Learning environments for real world innovation. In: Goldin, I., Martin, T., Baker, R., Aleven, V., Barnes, T. (eds.) Formative feedback in interactive learning environments, A workshop at AIED 2013 Memphis, TN (2013)
28. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2007)