Freaky: Performing hybrid human-machine emotion

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 607-616

  Leahu, Lucian ^a   Sengers, Phoebe ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b IS and STS at Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Affective interaction; Design strategies; Feminist STS; Machine learning; Performativity; Statistical models of emotion

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

AFFECTIVE INTERACTION; DESIGN STRATEGIES; FEMINIST STS; PERFORMATIVITY; STATISTICAL MODELS OF EMOTION;

DESIGN;

EID: 84904490549     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2598510.2600879     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Anderson, E. Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012).
2. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Duke Press.
3. Bardzell, S. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proc. CHI'10, 1301-1310.
4. Barrett, L. 2006. Are Emotions Natural Kinds? In Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1:1, 28-58.
5. Boehner, K., De Paula, R., Dourish, P. and Sengers, P. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. IJHCS 65(4), 275-291.
6. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
7. Chang, C.-C. & Lin, C.-J. 2001. LIBSVM. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2, 27:1-27:27.
8. Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. B. (eds.) Introduction. The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford Press, 2007, 3-7.
9. Haraway, D. 1998. Situated Knowledges. Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3. (Autumn, 1998), 575-599.
10. Harrison, S., Sengers, P., and Tatar, D. 2011. Making Epistemological Trouble: Third-Paradigm HCI as Successor Science. In Interacting with Computers. 23(5), 385-392.
11. Healey, J. and Picard, R. W. 2005 Detecting Stress during Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(2), 156-166.
12. Höök, K. 2008. Affective Loop Experiences - What Are They? In Proc. PERSUASIVE'08. Springer, 1-12.
13. Höök, K., Ståhl, A., Sundström, P., and Laaksolaahti, J. 2008. Interactional empowerment. In Proc. CHI'08, 647-656.
14. Iacobini, M., Gonsalves, T., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Frith, C. 2010. Emotional contagion in interactive art. Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, 1975-1984.
15. Kreibig, S. 2010. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. Biological Psychology 84, 394-421.
16. Laird, J. D. & Strout, S. Emotional Behaviour as Emotional Stimuli. 2007. Oxford Press, 54-63.
17. Leahu, L. 2012. Representation without Representationalism. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
18. Leahu, L., Schwenk, S., & Sengers, P. Subjective Objectivity: Negotiating Emotional Meaning. Proc. DIS'08, 425-434.
19. Lisetti, C., Nasoz, F. 2004. Using Noninvasive Wearable Computers to Recognize Human Emotions from Physiological Signals. Applied Signal Processing 2004:11, 1672-1687.
20. Picard, R. Affective Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1997.
21. Romero, M., Pousman, Z., & Mateas, M. (2008). Alien presence in the home. PUC, 12(5), 373-382.
22. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Mateas, M., and Gay, G. 2008. The disenchantment of affect. PUC. 12, 5(June 2008), 347-358.