The disenchantment of affect

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 347-358

  Sengers, Phoebe ^a   Boehner, Kirsten ^a   Mateas, Michael ^b   Gay, Geri ^a  

^a Social Dynamics Laboratory   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective computing; Affective presence; Ambient computing; Enchantment; Interpretation; Social awareness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONAL COMPUTING; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

AFFECTIVE COMPUTING; AMBIENT COMPUTING; COMPUTATIONAL MODELING; SOCIAL AWARENESS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 43049136641     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-007-0161-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Weber M (1946) Science as a vocation. In: Gerth HH, Mills CW (eds) trans. and ed., From Max Weber. Oxford University Press, NY, pp 129-156
2. McCarthy J, Wright P, Wallace J, Dearden A (2007) The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 10(6):369-378
3. Gell A (1992) The enchantment of technology and the technology of enchantment. In: Coote J, Shelton A (eds) Anthropology, art, and aesthetics. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 40-63
4. Boehner K (2006) Interfaces with the ineffable. PhD Dissertation. Department of Communication, Cornell University
5. Böhlen M, Mateas M (1998) Office Plant #1. Leonardo 31(5):345-348
6. Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B (2005) Evaluating technologies for ludic engagement. In: CHI 2005 workshop on innovative approaches to evaluating affective systems
7. Kaye J, Levitt M, Nevins J, Golden J, Schmitt V (2005) Communicating intimacy one bit at a time. CHI 2005. ACM, New York, pp 1529-1532
8. Lindström M, Ståhl A, Höök K, Sundström P, Laaksolathi J, Combetto M, Taylor A, Bresin R (2006) Affective diary. CHI 2006. ACM, New York, pp 1037-1042
9. Sundström P, Ståhl A, and Höök K (2006) A wild evaluation of users' emotional engagement. In: HUMAINE workshop on innovative approaches for evaluating affective systems
10. Dror O (1999) The scientific image of emotion. Configurations 7(3):355-401
11. Dror O (2001) Counting the affects. Social research 68(2):357-378
12. Mandryk R, Atkins MS, Inkpen K (2006) A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments. CHI 2006. ACM, NewYork, pp 1027-1036
13. Boehner K, DePaula R, Dourish P, Sengers P (2005) Affect: From information to interaction. Proc Critic Comput: 59-68
14. Picard R (1997) Affective computing. MIT, Cambridge
15. Damasio A (1995) Descartes' error. GP Putnam, New York
16. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Batliner A, Fischer K, Huber R, Spilker J, Noth E (2003) How to find trouble in communication. Speech Commun 40(1-2):117-143
18. Anttonen J, Surakka V (2005) Emotions and heart rate while sitting on a chair. CHI 2005. ACM, New York, pp 491-499
19. Bijker WE (1995) Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs. MIT, Cambridge
20. Oudshoorn N, Pinch T (2003) How users matter. MIT, Cambridge
21. Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation. DIS 2006
22. Campbell S (1998) Interpreting the personal. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
23. Hansen M (2004) New philosophy for new media. MIT, Cambridge
24. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is. MIT, Cambridge
25. McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. MIT, Cambridge
26. Wright P, McCarthy J (2003) Making sense of experience. In: Blythe M, Monk A, Overbeeke C, Wright P (eds) Funology. Kluwer, Dordrecht
27. Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artif Intell 47(1-3):139-159
28. Akrich M (1995) User representations. In: Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J (eds) Managing technology in society. Pinter Publishers, New York, pp 167-184
29. Sengers P, Boehner K, Warner S and Jenkins T (2005) Evaluating affector. In: CHI 2005 workshop on innovative approaches to evaluating affective systems
30. Mateas M (2001) Expressive AI. Leonardo 34(2):147-153
31. Aoki P, Woodruff A (2005) Making space for stories. CHI 2005, ACM, New York, pp 181-190
32. Bell G, Blythe M, Sengers P (2005) Making by making strange: defamiliarization and the design of domestic technology. ToCHI 12(2):149-173
33. Gaver W, Beaver J, Benford S (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. CHI 2003 ACM, New York, pp 233-240
34. Djajadiningrat JP, Gaver WW, Frens JW (2000) Interaction relabeling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. DIS 2000. ACM, New York, pp 66-71
35. Holmquist LE (2004) User-driven innovation in the future applications lab. CHI 2004. ACM, New York
36. Blythe M (2004) Pastiche scenarios. Interactions 11(5):51-53
37. Blythe M, Monk AF (2005) Net neighbours: Adapting HCI methods to cross the digital divide. Interact Comput 17:35-56
38. Denzin N, Lincoln Y (2000) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
39. Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B (2004) Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions 11(5):53-56