Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 826-834

  Hoiseth L O ^a,b   Hoff, I E ^b,c   Hagen, O A ^b   Landsverk, S A ^b   KirkebOen K A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA SURGERY; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE WAVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPLICATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DRUG EFFECTS; ECHOGRAPHY; EXHALATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; INHALATION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PLASMA; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TIDAL VOLUME; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HETASTARCH DERIVATIVE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; PLASMA SUBSTITUTE; RINGER'S ACETATE;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AREA UNDER CURVE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; EXHALATION; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYDROXYETHYL STARCH DERIVATIVES; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; INHALATION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PLASMA; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; STROKE VOLUME; TIDAL VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904472025     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12328     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cannesson M, de Backer D, Hofer CK,. Using arterial pressure waveform analysis for the assessment of fluid responsiveness. Expert Rev Med Devices 2011; 8: 635-646.
2. Iung B, Vahanian A,. Degenerative calcific aortic stenosis: a natural history. Heart 2012; 98 (Suppl. 4): iv7-13.
3. Stergiopulos N, Young DF, Rogge TR,. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1477-1488.
4. Hess OM, Villari B, Krayenbuehl HP,. Diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis. Circulation 1993; 87: IV73-76. (Pubitemid 23135652)
5. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
6. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Kersten JR, Riegel B, Robb JF, Smith SC Jr., Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW,. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007; 116: e418-499.
7. Petzoldt M, Riedel C, Braeunig J, Haas S, Goepfert MS, Treede H, Baldus S, Goetz AE, Reuter DA,. Stroke volume determination using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis in severe aortic valve disease. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 601-611.
8. Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Bendjelid K,. Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance. Crit Care 2011; 15: 414.
9. Dweck MR, Boon NA, Newby DE,. Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1854-1863.
10. Michard F,. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-428. (Pubitemid 41076740)
11. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B,. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a 'gray zone' approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-241.
12. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1787-1847.
13. Landsverk SA, Hoiseth LO, Kvandal P, Hisdal J, Skare O, Kirkeboen KA,. Poor agreement between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude and pulse pressure in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 849-855.
14. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A,. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17: 290-295.
15. Magder S, Lagonidis D,. Effectiveness of albumin versus normal saline as a test of volume responsiveness in post-cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care 1999; 14: 164-171. (Pubitemid 30017623)
16. Dark PM, Singer M,. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2060-2066. (Pubitemid 40022322)
17. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD,. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1801-1808.
18. Monnet X, Chemla D, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL,. Measuring aortic diameter improves accuracy of esophageal Doppler in assessing fluid responsiveness. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 477-482. (Pubitemid 46148538)
19. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F, Galy C, Slama M, Dupont H,. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2570-2575.