Gene movement and genetic association with regional climate gradients in California valley oak (Quercus lobata Née) in the face of climate change

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 3806-3823

  Sork, Victoria L ^a   Davis, Frank W ^b   Westfall, Robert ^c   Flint, Alan ^d   Ikegami, Makihiko ^b   Wang, Hongfang ^e   Grivet, Delphine ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^d U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^e BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

Author keywords

chloroplast and nuclear microsatellite; climate change; climate envelope; environmental gradients; landscape genetics

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA; PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOLOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; OAK; POPULATION GENETICS; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CLIMATE CHANGE; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; ECOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; QUERCUS;

QUERCUS LOBATA;

EID: 77956071665     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04726.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang TL, Curtis-McLane S (2008) Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 95 111.
2. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C et al. (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Molecular Ecology, 13, 937 954.
3. Barton N (2000) Genetic hitchhiking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 355, 553 1562.
4. Bawa KS, Dayanandan S (1998) Global climate change and tropical forest genetic resources. Climatic Change, 39, 473 485.
5. Bennett KD (1997) Evolution and Ecology: The Pace of Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Biwas S, Akey JM (2006) Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends in Genetics, 22, 437 446.
7. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73, 1045 1055.
8. Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
9. Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Dettinger MD, Tyree M, Hayhoe K (2008) Climate change scenarios for the California region. Climatic Change, 87, S21 S42.
10. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI et al. (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. International Journal of Climatology, 28, 2031 2064.
11. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science, 292, 673 679.
12. Davis FW, Stoms DM, Hollander AD et al. (1998) The California Gap Analysis Project - Final Report. University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. Available from http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/gap/gap-rep.html.
13. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology, 86, 1704 1714.
14. Deguilloux M-F, Dumolin-Lapègue S, Gielly L, Grivet D, Petit RJ (2003) A set of primers for the amplification of chloroplast microsatellites in Quercus. Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 24 27.
15. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin AJ, Smouse PE, Davis FW (2005) Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind pollinated tree species, Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92, 252 261.
16. Dyer RJ (2009) GENETICSTUDIO. A suite of programs for the spatial analysis of genetic marker data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 110 113.
17. Dyer RJ, Nason JD (2004) Population Graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1713 1727.
18. Dyer RJ, Nason JD, Garrick RC (2010) Landscape modelling of gene flow: Improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3746 3759.
19. Eckert AJ, Bower AD, González-Martínez SC, Wegrzyn JL, Coop G, Neale DB (2010) Back to nature: ecological genomics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae). Molecular Ecology, 19, 3789 3805.
20. Elith J, Graham C, Anderson R et al. (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129 151.
21. Endler JA (1986) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Eveno E, Collada C, Guevara MA et al. (2008) Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 417 437.
23. Flint AL, Flint LE (2007) Application of the basin characterization model to estimate in-place recharge and runoff potential in the Basin and Range carbonate-rock aquifer system, White Pine County, Nevada, and adjacent areas in Nevada and Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5099.
24. Flint AL, Flint LE (2010) Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecologic modeling and analysis. In Review, U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA.
25. Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2006) Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics, 174, 875 891.
26. Freedman AH, Thomassen HA, Buermann W, Smith TB (2010) Genomic signals of diversification along ecological gradients in a tropical lizard. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3773 3788.
27. Garrick RC, Nason JD, Meadows CA, Dyer RJ (2009) Not just vicariance: phylogeography of a Sonoran Desert euphorb indicates a major role of range expansion along the Baja peninsula. Molecular Ecology, 18, 1916 1931.
28. Gomez J (2003) Spatial patterns in long-distance dispersal of Quercus ilex acorns by jays in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecography, 26, 573 584.
29. González-Martínez SC, Ersoz E, Brown GR, Wheeler NC, Neale DB (2006) DNA sequence variation and selection of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms at candidate genes for drought-stress response in Pinus taeda L. Genetics, 172, 1915 1926.
30. González-Martínez SC, Wheeler NC, Ersoz E, Nelson CD, Neale DB (2007) Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood property traits. Genetics, 175, 399 409.
31. Griffin JR, Critchfield WB (1972) The Distribution of the Forest Trees in California. Pacific SW Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Berkeley.
32. Grivet D, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2005) A novel approach to an old problem: tracking dispersed seeds. Molecular Ecology, 14, 3585 3595.
33. Grivet D, Deguilloux M-F, Petit RJ, Sork VL (2006) Contrasting patterns of historical colonization in white oaks (Quercus spp.) in California and Europe. Molecular Ecology, 15, 4085 4093.
34. Grivet D, Sork VL, Westfall RD, Davis FW (2008) Conserving the evolutionary potential of California valley oak (Quercus lobata Nee): a multivariate genetic approach to conservation planning. Molecular Ecology, 17, 139 156.
35. Grivet D, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2009a) Relative contribution of contemporary pollen and seed dispersal to the effective parental size of seedling population of California valley oak (Quercus lobata Nee). Molecular Ecology, 18, 3967 3979.
36. Grivet D, Sebastiani F, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Vendramin GG (2009b) Patterns of polymorphism resulting from long-range colonization in the Mediterranean conifer Aleppo pine. New Phytologist, 184, 1016 1028.
37. Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 323 335.
38. Heuertz M, De Paoli E, Kallman T et al. (2006) Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]. Genetics, 174, 2095 2105.
39. Hidalgo HG, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2008) Downscaling with constructed analogues: Daily precipitation and temperature fields over the United States. PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Report CEC-500-2007-123. California Energy Commission, Sacramento.
40. Holderegger R, Kamm U, Gugerli F (2006) Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landscape Ecology, 21, 797 807.
41. Holsinger KE (1993) The evolutionary dynamics of fragmented plant populations. In : Biotic Interactions and Global Change eds Kingsolver JG, Kareiva PM, Huey RB pp. 198 216. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
42. Jackson ST, Overpeck JT (2000) Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary. Paleobiology, 26, 194 220.
43. Joost S, Kalbermatten M, Bonin A (2008) Spatial analysis method (SAM): a software tool combining molecular and environmental data to identify candidate loci for selection. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 957 960.
44. Jump AS, Hunt JM, Martínez-Izquierdo JA, Peñuelas J (2006) Natural selection and climate change: temperature-linked spatial and temporal trends in gene frequency in Fagus sylvatica. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3469 3480.
45. Kelly PA, Phillips SE, Williams DF (2005) Documenting ecological change in time and space: the San Joaquin Valley of California. In : Mammalian Diversification: From Chromo-somes to Phylogeograph (A Celebration of the Career of James L. Patton) (eds Lacey EA, Myers P University of California Press, Berkeley.
46. Kueppers LM, Snyder MA, Sloan LC, Zavaleta ES, Fulfrost B (2005) Modeled regional climate change and California enaemic oak ranges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16281 16286.
47. Ledig FT (1992) Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos, 63, 87 108.
48. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
49. Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H et al. (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature, 462, 1052 1111.
50. Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan S, Taberlet P (2003) The power and promise of population genomics: From genotyping to genome typing. Nature Review Genetics, 4, 981 994.
51. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 189 197.
52. Manel S, Joost S, Epperson BK et al. (2010) Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3760 3772.
53. McLachlan JS, Clark JS (2004) Reconstructing historical ranges with fossil data at continental scales. Forest Ecology and Management Holsinger, 197, 139 147.
54. Mitton JB (1997) Selection in Natural Populations. Oxford University Press, New York.
55. Namroud MC, Beaulieu J, Juge N, Laroche J, Bousquet J (2008) Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide poly-morphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3599 3613.
56. Nielsen R (2005) Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics, 39, 197 218.
57. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 637 669.
58. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Working Group II Report. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
59. Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161 175.
60. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling, 190, 231 259.
61. Pluess AR, Sork VL, Dolan B et al. (2009) Short distance pollen movement in a wind-pollinated tree, Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 735 744.
62. Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G (2010) The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Current Biology, 20, R208 R215.
63. Pyhajarvi T, Garcia-Gil MR, Knurr T et al. (2007) Demographic history has influenced nucleotide diversity in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Genetics, 177, 1713 1724.
64. Randin CF, Jaccard H, Vittoz P, Yoccoz NG, Guisan A (2009) Land use improves spatial predictions of mountain plant abundance but not presence-absence. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 996 1008.
65. Rehfeldt GE, Tchebakova NM, Parfenova YI et al. (2002) Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology, 8, 912 929.
66. Rehfeldt GE, Crookston NL, Warwell MV, Evans JS (2006) Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 167, 1123 1150.
67. SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 1. Cary, NC.
68. Savolainen O, Pyhajarvi T, Knurr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38, 595 619.
69. Scofield D, Sork VL, Smouse P (2010) Influence of acorn woodpecker social behaviour on transport of coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) acorns in a southern California oak savanna. Journal of Ecology, 98, 561 572.
70. Seo C, Thorne JH, Hannah L, Thuiller W (2009) Scale effects in species distribution models: implications for conservation planning under climate change. Biology Letters, 5, 39 43.
71. Smouse PE, Williams RC (1982) Multivariate analysis of Hla disease associations. Biometrics, 38, 757 768.
72. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution, 55, 260 271.
73. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al. (2007) Working Group I Report.The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
74. Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006) Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landscape Ecology, 21, 821 836.
75. Sork VL, Dyer R, Davis F, Smouse P (2002a) Mating system in California Valley oak, Quercus lobata Neé. In : Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Oak Woodlands: Oaks in California's Changing Landscape. 2001 October 22-25; San Diego, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184 (eds Standiford RBMD, McCreary D, Purcell KL pp. 427 444. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA.
76. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE et al. (2002b) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Molecular Ecology, 11, 1657 1668.
77. Sork VL, Davis FW, Grivet D (2009) Incorporating genetic information into conservation planning for California valley oak. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-217 497-509.
78. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS et al. (2007) Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity, 98, 128 142.
79. Thomassen HA, Cheviron ZA, Freedman AH, Harrigan RJ, Wayne RK, Smith TB (2010) Spatial modelling and landscape-level approaches for visualizing intra-specific variation. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3532 3548.
80. Trivedi MR, Berry PM, Morecroft MD, Dawson TP (2008) Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. Global Change Biology, 14, 1089 1103.
81. Tyler CM, Kuhn B, Davis FW (2006) Demography and recruitment limitations of three oak species in California. Quarterly Review of Biology, 81, 127 152.
82. Wachowiak W, Balk PA, Savolainen O (2009) Search for nucleotide diversity patterns of local adaptation in dehydrins and other cold-related candidate genes in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Genetics & Genomes, 5, 117 132.
83. Westfall RD, Conkle MT (1992) Allozyme markers in breeding zone designation. Population Genetics of Forest Trees, 42, 279 309.
84. Whipple A, Grossinger R, Davis FW (2010) Shifting baselines in a California oak savanna: Nineteenth Century data to inform restoration scenarios. Restoration Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00633.x.
85. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 413 418.
86. Zanetto A, Roussel G, Kremer A (1994) Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L, Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. I. Monolocus patterns of variation. Forest Genetics, 1, 111 123. V.L.S. studies the ecological and evolutionary processes of tree populations in temperate and tropical habitats with a landscape genetic and environmental genomics approach to study gene flow, adaptation, and conservation in California oaks. F.W.D. is a biogeographer and landscape ecologist broadly interested in the coupling of vegetation pattern and ecological processes, California shrubland and oak woodland ecology, impacts of climate change in Mediterranean-climate regions, and reserve network design. R.D.W. is quantitative forest geneticist who studies geographical genetics, responses to subalpine trees species to climate changes, rock-ice features as biotic refugia, and landscape patterns and the thermal environments of American pika. A.L.F. is a U.S. Geological Survey research hydrologist working in downscaling current and future climate scenarios to ecologically relevant scales then translating those climates into hydrologic response across the landscape including recharge, runoff, evapotranspiration, and climatic water deficits to evaluate changes in habitat and potential habitat refugia under global climate change. M.I. is a plant ecologist working in the fields of forestry, biogeography, and conservation biology focusing on evaluating species distributions and performances under different environments through modeling and field works. H.W. applies the methods of landscape genetics and phylogeography to understand the response of single species or communities to the changing world. D.G. is interested in population genetics and genomics, gene flow and conservation genetics of temperate forest trees.