Forest disturbance and North American carbon flux

Eos

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 105-106

  Goward, Samuel N ^a   Masek, Jeffrey G ^b   Cohen, Warren ^c   Moisen, Gretchen ^d   Collatz, G James ^b   Healey, Sean ^e   Houghton, R A ^e   Huang, Chengquan ^a   Kennedy, Robert ^c   Law, Beverly ^f   Powell, Scott ^c   Turner, David ^g   Wulder, Michael A ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^d ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^e Woods Hole Research Center   (United States)

^f OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON FLUX; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FOREST ECOSYSTEM;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 42149190047     PISSN: 00963941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2008EO110001     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chambers, J. Q., J. I. Fisher, H. Zeng, E. L. Chapman, D. B. Baker, and G. C. Hurn (2007), Hurricane Katrina's carbon footprint on U.S. Gulf Const forests, Science, 318(585:3). 1107 doi:101l26/science. 1148913.
2. Houghton, R. A., J. L. Hackler. and K. T. Lawrence (1999), The U.S. carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change. Science, 285(5427), 574-578. doi:10.1126/science.285.5427.574.
3. Kennedy. R. E. W. B. Cohen, and T. A. Schroeder (2007), Trajectory-based change detection for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics, Remote Sens, Environ., 110, 370-386.
4. Law, B. E., D. Turner, M. Lelsky. J, Campbell, M, Guzy. O. Sun. S. Van Tuyl, and W. Cohen (2006), Carbon fluxes across regions: Observaltional constraints at multiple wales, in Scaling and Uncertainty, Analysis in Ecology Methods and Applications. edited by J.Wu etal., pp 167-190, Columbia Univ, Press, New York.
5. Masek. J. G., and G. J. Collalz (2006). Estimating forest-carbon fluxes in a disturbed southeastern landscape: Integration of remote sensing, forest inventory, and biogeochemical modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 111, G01006. doi:10.1029/2005JG000062.
6. Masek, J. G., E. F. Vermole, N. Saleous, R. Wolfe, F. G. Hall. F. Huemmrich, F. Gao, J. Kutler, and T. K. Lim (2006), A Landsat surface reflectance data set for North America. 1990-2000, Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 3, 68-72.
7. Pacala, S, et al. (2007), The North American carbon budget past and present. in The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR), edited by A. W. King et al., pp, 29-26, NOAA Natl. Clin. Data Cent., Asheville, N. C.
8. Potter, C. P. N. Tan, V. Kumar, C. Kucharik, S. Klooser, V. Genovese, W. Cohen, and S. Healey (2005). Recent history of large-scale ecosystem disturbances in North America derived from the AVHRR satellit record. Ecosystems, 8, 808-824.
9. Smith, W, B., and D. Darr (2004), U.S. forest resource facts and historical trends. Publ FS-801, 40 pp., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, D. C.
10. Turner, D. P., W. D. Rills, B. E. Law, W. B. Cohen, Z. Yang. T. Hudiburg, J. L. Campbell, and M. Duane (2007). Scaling net ecosystem production and net biome production over a heterogeneous region in the western United States, Biogeosciences, 4, 597-612.
11. 2 from fires in the United States: Implication, for carbon management, Carbon Balance Manage, 2, 10. doi:10,1186/1750-0680-2-10.
12. Wofsy, S. C., and R. C. Harris (2002), The North American Carbon Program (NACP): Report of the NACP Committee of the U.S. Interagency Carbon Cycle Science Program, U.S. Global Change Res Program, Washington. D. C.