Comparative visualization of molecular surfaces using deformable models

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 191-200

  Scharnowski, K ^a   Krone, M ^a   Reina, G ^a   Kulschewski, T ^a   Pleiss, J ^a   Ertl, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS):; I.3.5 Computer Graphics : Computational Geometry and Object Modeling Boundary representations; I.4.7 Image Processing and Computer Vision : Feature Measurement Size and Shape; J.3 Computer Applications : Life and Medical Sciences Biology and Genetics

Indexed keywords

COLOR MATCHING; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DEFORMATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAPPING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATTERN MATCHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUALIZATION;

3D MOLECULAR VISUALIZATIONS; COMPARATIVE VISUALIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY AND OBJECT MODELING; COMPUTER AIDED DRUG DESIGN; DESCRIPTORS; ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS; FEATURE MEASUREMENT; LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES-BIOLOGY AND GENETICS;

COLOR COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84904418519     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12375     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baum D., Hege H.-C.,: A point-matching based algorithm for 3d surface alignment of drug-sized molecules. In Computational Life Sciences II, vol. 4216 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 2006, pp. 183-193. 2
2. Bojsen-Hansen M., Li H., Wojtan C.,: Tracking Surfaces with Evolving Topology. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4 (2012), 53:1-53:10. 3
3. Blinn J.F.,: A Generalization of Algebraic Surface Drawing. ACM Trans. Graph. 1, 3 (1982), 235-256. 3
4. Besl P.J., McKay N.D.,: A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 2 (1992), 239-256. 3
5. Bargteil A.W., Sin F., Michaels J.E., Goktekin T.G., O'Brien J.F.,: A texture synthesis method for liquid animations. In Proc. 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/EG Symposium on Computer Animation (2006), SCA '06, pp. 345-351. 3
6. Cosgrove D., Bayada D., Johnson A.,: A novel method of aligning molecules by local surface shape similarity. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 14, 6 (2000), 573-591. 2
7. Cohen L.D., Cohen I.,: Finite-Element Methods for Active Contour Models and Balloons for 2-D and 3-D Images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15, 11 (Nov. 1993), 1131-1147. 4
8. Campen M., Kobbelt L.,: Exact and robust (self-)intersections for polygonal meshes. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 2 (2010), 397-406. 3
9. Dinh H.Q., Yezzi A., Turk G.,: Texture transfer during shape transformation. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 2 (Apr. 2005), 289-310. 3
10. Finn P.W., Morris G.M.,: Shape-based similarity searching in chemical databases. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 3, 3 (2013), 226-241. 2
11. Grant J.A., Pickup B.T.,: A Gaussian description of molecular shape. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 11 (1995), 3503-3510. 3
12. Gil D., Radeva P.,: Curvature Vector Flow to Assure Convergent Deformable Models for Shape Modelling. In In EMMCVPR (2003), pp. 357-372. 9
13. Hofbauer C., Lohninger H., Aszõdi A.,: SURFCOMP: A novel graph-based approach to molecular surface comparison. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 44 (2004), 837-847. 2
14. Johnson M.A., Maggiora G.M.,: Concepts and applications of molecular similarity. Wiley-Interscience Publication. Wiley, 1990. 2
15. Kabsch W.,: A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 34, 5 (Sept. 1976), 922-923. 3
16. Kraevoy V., Sheffer A.,: Cross-parameterization and compatible remeshing of 3D models. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3 (Aug. 2004), 861-869. 2
17. Krone M., Stone J.E., Ertl T., Schulten K.,: Fast Visualization of Gaussian Density Surfaces for Molecular Dynamics and Particle System Trajectories. In EuroVis 2012 Short Pap. (2012), vol. 1. 5
18. Kass M., Witkin A., Terzopoulos D.,: Snakes: Active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1, 4 (1988), 321-331. 2, 4
19. Liu Y.-S., Fang Y., Ramani K.,: Idss: deformation invariant signatures for molecular shape comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 1 (2009), 1-14. 2
20. Montagnat J., Delingette H., Ayache N.,: A review of deformable surfaces: topology, geometry and deformation. Image Vis. Comput. 19, 14 (2001), 1023-1040. 2
21. Müller M.,: Fast and robust tracking of fluid surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (2009), pp. 237-245. 3
22. Osher S., Fedkiw R.,: Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 2003. 3
23. Pettersen E.F., Goddard T.D., Huang C.C., Couch G.S., Greenblatt D.M., Meng E.C., Ferrin T.E.,: UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 13 (2004), 1605-1612. 2
24. Pfaffelmoser T., Reitinger M., Westermann R.,: Visualizing the Positional and Geometrical Variability of Iso-surfaces in Uncertain Scalar Fields. In Comput. Graph. Forum (2011), vol. 30, pp. 951-960. 6
25. Postarnakevich N., Singh R.,: Global-to-local representation and visualization of molecular surfaces using deformable models. In Proc. 2009 ACM Symp. Appl. Comput. (2009), SAC '09, ACM, pp. 782-787. 2
26. Richards F.M.,: Areas, Volumes, Packing, and Protein Structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 6, 1 (1977), 151-176. 3
27. Ritchie D.W., Kemp G. J. L.,: Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. J. Comput. Chem. 20, 4 (1999), 383-395. 2
28. Schreiner J., Asirvatham A., Praun E., Hoppe H.,: Inter-Surface Mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3 (Aug. 2004), 870-877. 2
29. Schneider G., Baringhaus K.-H.,: Molecular design: concepts and applications. Wiley-VCH, 2008. 3
30. Sotiras A., Christos D., Paragios N.,: Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey. Research Report RR-7919, INRIA, Sept. 2012. 2
31. Sotiras A., Davatzikos C., Paragios N.,: Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32, 7 (2013), 1153-1190. 2
32. Shen T., Huang X., Li H., Kim E., Zhang S., Huang J.,: A 3D Laplacian-driven parametric deformable model. In ICCV (2011), IEEE, pp. 279-286. 5
33. Sael L., La D., Li B., Rustamov R., Kihara D.,: Rapid comparison of properties on protein surface. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 73, 1 (2008), 1-10. 2, 8, 9
34. Tang J., Millington S., Acton S.T., Crandall J., Hurwitz S.,: Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from mr images using directional gradient vector flow snakes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering 53, 5 (2006), 896-907. 3
35. Tangelder J.W., Veltkamp R.C.,: A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. Multimed. Tools Appl. 39, 3 (Sept. 2008), 441-471. 2
36. Terzopoulos D., Witkin A., Kass M.,: Constraints on deformable models: recovering 3D shape and nongrid motion. Artif. Intell. 36, 1 (Aug. 1988), 91-123. 2, 4
37. Via A., Ferrè F., Brannetti B., Helmer-Citterich M.,: Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. C. 57, 13-14 (2000), 1970-1977. 2
38. van K aick O., Z hang H., H amarneh G., C ohen -O r D.: A Survey on Shape Correspondence. Comput. Graph. Forum 30, 6 (2011), 1681-1707. 2
39. Weng Y., Chai M., Xu W., Tong Y., Zhou K.,: As-rigid-as-possible distance field metamorphosis. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 7 (2013), 381-389. 3
40. Wojtan C., Thürey N., Gross M., Turk G.,: Physics-inspired topology changes for thin fluid features. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4 (July 2010), 50:1-50:8. 3
41. Xu C., Prince J.L.,: Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 7, 3 (1998), 359-369. 3, 4, 5