The fuzzy TOPSIS and generalized Choquet fuzzy integral algorithm for nuclear power plant site selection - A case study from Turkey

Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1241-1255

  Kurt, Ünal ^a  

^a AMASYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

fuzzy TOPSIS; generalized Choquet fuzzy integral algorithm; nuclear power plant; site selection

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; SITE SELECTION;

CHOQUET FUZZY INTEGRAL; ECONOMIC OPERATIONS; FUZZY TOPSIS; LOCATION SELECTION; OPTIMAL LOCATIONS; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; STUDY SITES; WATER CAPACITY;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 84904395203     PISSN: 00223131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2014.918524     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Turkish energy industry report. Available from: http://www.invest.gov.tr/ en-US/sectors/Pages/Energy.aspx.
2. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=TU.
3. Atomic Energy Licensing Board Ministry of Science. Guideline for site selection for nuclear power plant, . LEM/TEK/63 22 MAC, 2011; 1-47.
4. Garg RK., Agrawal VP., Gupta VK. Coding, evaluation and selection of thermal power plants-A MADM approach. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 2007; 29: 657-668. (Pubitemid 47454643)
5. Choidhary D., Shankar R. A STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluating and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy. 2012; 42: 510-521.
6. Idris R., Latif ZA. GIS multi-criteria for power plant site selection. IEEE Cont Syst Grad Res Colloq. 2012; 203-206.
7. Aragones-Beltran P., Chaparro-Gonzalez F., Pastor-Ferrando., Rodriguez-Pozo JPF. An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment project. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2010; 14: 249-264.
8. Dubois D., Prade H. A review of fuzzy sets aggregation connectives. Inf Sci. 1985; 36: 85-121. (Pubitemid 15604334)
9. Klir GJ., Yuan B. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1995.
10. Murofushi T., Sugeno M. A theory of fuzzy measures: representations, the Choquet integral, and null sets. J Math Anal Appl. 1991; 159 (2): 532-549.
11. Chiang JH. Choquet fuzzy integral-based hierarchical networks for decision analysis. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 1999; 7 (1): 63-71.
12. Yayla AY., Yldz A., Yldz K. A generalized choquet integral algorithm for subcontractor selection in textile industry-a case study for Turkey. Fibres Textiles East Eur. 2013; 6 (102): 16-21.
13. Tsai H-H., Lu I-Y. The evaluation of service quality using generalized choquet integral. Inf Sci. 2006; 176 (6): 640-663. (Pubitemid 43031460)
14. Wang Z. A new model of nonlinear multiregressions by projection pursuit based on generalized Choquet integrals. FUZZ-IEEE. 2002, . Hawaii, 1240-1244. (Pubitemid 35466300)
15. Wang Z., Guo HF. A new genetic algorithm for nonlinear multiregressions based on generalized choquet integrals. The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ03, Vol. 2. 2003; p. 819-822.
16. Hurst HE. Long term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng. 1951; 116: 770-799.
17. Choquet G. Theory of capacities. Annales de lInstitut Fourier. 1953; 5: 131-295.
18. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Systems. 1978.
19. Wang Z., Klir GJ. Fuzzy measure theory. New York: Plenum Press; 1992.
20. Chang HJ., Chang PC., Liu HC., Lee KJ., Wang JD., Liu YL. Choquet integral algorithm for thermostable proteins based on Hurst exponent and generalized L-measure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics; 2010 July 11-14, Qingdao.
21. Chen CF., Tsai D. How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Manag. 2007; 28: 1115-1122. (Pubitemid 46477987)
22. Chen CT. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000; 114: 1-9.
23. Boran FE., Genc S., Kurt M., Akay D. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl. 2009; 36 (8): 11363-11368.
24. Draft Regulatory Document. RD-346 site evaluation for new nuclear power plants, 2007 Oct; 1-27.