Invited commentary: Digital breast tomosynthesis-the road ahead

Radiographics

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Feig, Stephen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 84904310281     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.344140140     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Feig SA. Image quality of screening mammography: effect on clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(4):805-807.
2. Feig SA. Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence. Radiol Clin North Am (in press).
3. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.
4. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(7):583-589.
5. Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(6):1401-1408.
6. Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 2013;269(3):694-700.
7. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013;266(1):104-113.
8. Roth RG, Maidment ADA, Weinstein SP, Roth SO, Conant EF. Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation. Radio-Graphics 2014;34(4):E89-E102.
9. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307(13):1394-1404.
10. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1):59-69.
11. Feig SA. Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45(5):791-800, vi.
12. Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. Acad Radiol 2012;19(2):166-171.
13. Dang PA, Freer PE, Humphrey KL, Halpern EF, Rafferty EA. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations. Radiology 2014;270(1):49-56.