Knowledge and attitudes of Turkish endodontists towards digital radiology and cone beam computed tomography

Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 471-478

  Yalcinkaya, S Ercalik ^a   Berker, Y Garip ^a   Peker, S ^a   Basturk, F B ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Digital imaging; Knowledge; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UTILIZATION REVIEW; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; TURKEY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904289246     PISSN: 11193077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.134044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:427-38.
2. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:197-202.
3. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:203-8.
4. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, Van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:93-9.
5. Brian JN, Williamson GF. Digital radiography in dentistry: A survey of Indiana dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:18-23.
6. Dölekoglu S, Fisekçioglu E, Ilgüy M, Ilgüy D. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:379-84.
7. Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Dinçer S, Bayirli G. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:222-7.
8. Kamburoglu K, Kursun S, Akarslan ZZ. Dental students' knowledge and attitudes towards cone beam computed tomography in Turkey. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:439-43.
9. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006;39:921-30.
10. van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: The uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1379-87.
11. Van der Stelt PF. Better imaging: The advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:7-13S.
12. Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: A review. J Endod 2007;33:1-6.
13. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 2009;2009:634567.
14. Kaptan RF, Haznedaroglu F, Kayahan MB, Basturk FB. An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:565413.
15. Turkish Endodontic Society. Available from: http://www. turkendodontidernegi. org/2013 [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 03].
16. Jacobs R, Vanderstappen M, Bogaerts R, Gijbels F. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:334-9.
17. Davies C, Grange S, Trevor MM. Radiation protection practices and related continuing professional education in dental radiography: A survey of practitioners in the North-east of England. Radiography 2005;11:255-61.
18. Aps JK. Flemish general dental practitioners' knowledge of dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:113-8.
19. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, Van der Stelt PF. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:124-7.
20. Gound TG, DuBois L, Biggs SG. Factors that affect the rate of retakes for endodontic treatment radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77:514-8.
21. Peciuliene V, Rimkuviene J, Maneliene R, Drukteinis S. Use of dental radiography among Lithuanian general dentists. Stomatologija 2009;11:77-82.
22. Chandler NP, Koshy S. Radiographic practices of dentists undertaking endodontics in New Zealand. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:317-21.
23. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1121-32.
24. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4-and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:83-6.
25. Arnheiter C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage. Oral Radiol 2006;22:80-5.
26. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114-9.
27. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-30.
28. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:559-65.