Digital radiography in dentistry: A survey of Indiana dentists

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-23

  Brian, J N ^a   Williamson, Gail F ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data collection; Dental offices; Radiography, dental; Radiography, dental, digital

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DENTAL HEALTH; DENTAL PRACTICE; DENTIST; DENTISTRY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DENTISTS; ENDODONTICS; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; GROUP PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; INDIANA; MIDDLE AGED; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; PERIODONTICS; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 33947650164     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/18567861     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 427-438.
2. Goff S. Radiography. A DPR survey report. Dent Prod Rep 2005; 39: 12, 14-16, 20, 22
3. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 203-208.
4. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 93-99.
5. Mailed questionnaires. OSU Bureau for Social Research. Oklahoma State University for Social Research. http://www.ches.okstate.edu/bsr/mailed.html [Last accessed 07 December 2006]
6. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1977; 50: 1129-1136.
7. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Decision criteria of Norwegian general practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 197-202.
8. Valachovic RW, Weaver RG, Sinkford JC, Haden KH. Trends in dentistry and dental education. J Dent Educ 2001; 65: 539-561.
9. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 97-101.
10. Bahrami G, Hagstrom C, Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 317-321.
11. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 124-127.
12. Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital radiography: an overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 4: 23-39.
13. Schlossberg M (editor). Image is everything. Dent Pract Rep 2005; 13: 40-48