A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 93-99

  Berkhout, W E R ^a   Sanderink, G C H ^a   Van Der Stelt, P F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dental radiography; Radiographic image enhancement; X ray sensors

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENTAL RADIOLOGY; DENTIST; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; NETHERLANDS; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW; X RAY FILM; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; STATISTICS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OWNERSHIP; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0036491887     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600669     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Van der Stelt PF. Principles of digital imaging. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 237-248.
2. Hildebolt ChF, Couture RA, Whiting BR. Dental Photostimulable Phosphor Radiography. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 273-297.
3. Sanderink GCH, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 249-255.
4. Miles DA, Langlais RP, Parks ET. Digital X-rays are here; why aren't you using them? J Cal Dent Assoc 1999; 27: 926-934.
5. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997; 25: 215-224.
6. Mol A. Image processing tools for dental applications. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 299-318.
7. Wenzel A, Gröndahl H-G. Direct digitalradiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 1995; 45: 27-34.
8. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 3-11.
9. Wenzel A. Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent 1999; 2: 269-290.
10. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 197-202.
11. Wenzel A, Moystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 203-208.
12. Hovland EJ, Romberg E, Moreland EF. Nonresponse bias to mail survey questionnaires within a professional population. J Dent Ed 1980; 44: 270-274.
13. Wallace D. A case for and against mail questionnaires. Pub Opin Quart 1954; 18: 40-52.
14. Cafferta, G, Goldberg H, Roghmann K, Fox R. Continuing education: attitudes, interests, and experiences of practicing dentists. J Dent Ed 1975; 39: 793-799.
15. Tamisien P, McKercher T, Mattson J, Blankenau R, Trumm G. Emphasis and quality of a dental education: A survey of graduates. J Dent Ed 1977; 41: 595.
16. Wasilkoff P, Maurice D. Role of endodontics in current dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 800-805.
17. Bauer J, Bush R. Dentists' Attitudes toward continuing education in TEAM. J Dent Ed 1977; 41: 623-626.
18. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 427-438.