Paper engineered with cellulosic additives: Effect of length scale

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 2901-2911

  Su, Jielong ^a   Zhang, Liyuan ^a   Batchelor, Warren ^a   Garnier, Gil ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Composite; MFC; Paper; Permeability; Polymer; Strength

Indexed keywords

BALL MILLING; CELLULOSE; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; HARDWOODS; PAPER; POLYMERS;

BROAD SIZE DISTRIBUTION; CRYOGENIC MILLING; ELONGATION AT BREAK; MFC; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (MFC); POLYAMIDEAMINE-EPICHLOROHYDRIN; STRENGTH; STRENGTHENING EFFECT;

MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY;

CELLULOSE; COMPOSITES; GRINDING; HARDWOODS; PAPER; POLYMERS;

EID: 84904285116     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0298-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahola S, Osterberg M, Laine J (2008) Cellulose nanofibrils-adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15(2): 303-314. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-007-9167-3.
2. Aulin C, Gallstedt M, Lindstrom T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17(3): 559-574. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-009-9393-y.
3. Espy HH (1995) The mechanism of wet-strength development in paper-a review. Tappi J 78(4): 90-99.
4. Gardner DJ, Oporto GS, Mills R, Samir MASA (2008) Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J Adhes Sci Technol 22(5-6): 545-567. doi: 10. 1163/156856108x295509.
5. Jackson GW, James DF (1986) The permeability of fibrous porous-media. Can J Chem Eng 64(3): 364-374.
6. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24): 5438-5466. doi: 10. 1002/anie. 201001273.
7. Koga H, Saito T, Kitaoka T, Nogi M, Suganuma K, Isogai A (2013) Transparent, conductive, and printable composites consisting of TEMPO-oxidized nanocellulose and carbon nanotube. Biomacromolecules 14(4): 1160-1165. doi: 10. 1021/Bm400075f.
8. Manninen M, Kajanto I, Happonen J, Paltakari J (2011) The effect of microfibrillated cellulose addition on drying shrinkage and dimensional stability of wood-free paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26(3): 297-305.
9. Mosse WKJ, Boger DV, Simon GP, Garnier G (2012) Effect of cationic polyacrylamides on the interactions between cellulose fibers. Langmuir 28(7): 3641-3649. doi: 10. 1021/La2049579.
10. Myllytie P, Salmen L, Haimi E, Laine J (2010) Viscoelasticity and water plasticization of polymer-cellulose composite films and paper sheets. Cellulose 17(2): 375-385. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-009-9376-z.
11. Niskanen K (1998) Papermaking science and technology: paper physics, Book 16. Fapet Oy, Helsinki.
12. Obokata T, Isogai A (2007) The mechanism of wet-strength development of cellulose sheets prepared with polyamideamine-epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin. Colloid Surf A 302(1-3): 525-531. doi: 10. 1016/j. colsurfa. 2007. 03. 025.
13. Obokata T, Isogai A (2009) Wet-strength development of cellulose sheets prepared with polyamideamine-epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin by physical interactions. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 24(2): 135-140.
14. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppala J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19(3): 647-659. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-012-9661-0.
15. Seth RS (1995) The effect of fiber length and coarseness on the tensile-strength of wet webs-a statistical geometry explanation. Tappi J 78(3): 99-102.
16. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3): 459-494. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-010-9405-y.
17. Su JL, Mosse WKJ, Sharman S, Batchelor W, Garnier G (2012) Paper strength development and recyclability with polyamideamine-epichlorohydrin (PAE). Bioresources 7(1): 913-924.
18. Su JL, Mosse WKJ, Sharman S, Batchelor WJ, Garnier G (2013) Effect of tethered and free microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) on the properties of paper composites. Cellulose 20(4): 1925-1935. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-013-9955-x.
19. Taipale T, Osterberg M, Nykanen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17(5): 1005-1020. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-010-9431-9.
20. Tejado A, van de Ven TGM (2010) Why does paper get stronger as it dries? Mater Today 13(9): 42-49.
21. Varanasi S, Batchelor WJ (2013) Rapid preparation of cellulose nanofibre sheet. Cellulose 20(1): 211-215. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-012-9794-1.
22. Varanasi S, Chiam HH, Batchelor W (2012) Application and interpretation of zero and short-span testing on nanofibre sheet materials. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27(2): 343-351. doi: 10. 3183/Npprj-2012-27-02-P343-351.
23. Varanasi S, He RL, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20(4): 1885-1896. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-013-9972-9.
24. Yoon SH (2006) Adsorption kinetics of polyamide-epichlorohydrin on cellulosic fibres suspended in aqueous solution. J Ind Eng Chem 12(6): 877-881.
25. Zhang LY, Tsuzuki T, Wang XG (2010) Preparation and characterization on cellulose nanofiber film. Mater Sci Forum 654-656: 1760-1763. doi: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/MSF. 654-656. 1760.
26. Zhang LY, Batchelor W, Varanasi S, Tsuzuki T, Wang XG (2012) Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration. Cellulose 19(2): 561-574. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-011-9641-9.