Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration

Cellulose

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 561-574

  Zhang, Liyuan ^a   Batchelor, Warren ^b   Varanasi, Swambabu ^b   Tsuzuki, Takuya ^a   Wang, Xungai ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofiber; Nanofiber length; Nanofiber sheets; Sedimentation

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE NANOFIBERS; FIBER ASPECT RATIO; FIBER DIAMETERS; FIBER DIMENSIONS; FIBER SUSPENSIONS; HETEROGENEOUS DISTRIBUTIONS; NANOFIBER SHEETS; NORTHERN BLEACHED SOFTWOOD KRAFT; PERCOLATION THEORY; SEM IMAGE; SHEET FORMING; SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS; SOLIDS CONTENT;

ASPECT RATIO; CELLULOSE; NANOFIBERS; SEDIMENTATION;

FIBERS;

EID: 84862788369     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9641-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abe K, Yano H (2011) Formation of hydrogels from cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 85(4): 733-737. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2011. 03. 028.
2. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J (2008) Cellulose nanofibrils-adsorption with poly (amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15(2): 303-314. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-007-9167-3.
3. Ampulski RS (2001) Report of investigation reference materials 8495 Northern Softwood Bleached Kraft 8496 Eucalyptus Hardwood Bleached Kraft. National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD.
4. Andresen M, Stenius P (2007) Water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by hydrophobized micro fibrillated cellulose. J Dispers Sci Technol 28(6): 837-844.
5. Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Cellulose biocomposites-from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull 35(3): 201-207.
6. Celzard A, Fierro V, Kerekes R (2009) Flocculation of cellulose fibres: new comparison of crowding factor with percolation and effective-medium theories. Cellulose 16(6): 983-987.
7. Dufresne A, Dupeyre D, Vignon MR (2000) Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: processing and characterization of starch-cellulose microfibril composites. J Appl Polym Sci 76(14): 2080-2092.
8. Dunham AJ, Sherman LM, Alfano JC (2002) Effect of dissolved and colloidal substances on drainage properties of mechanical pulp suspensions. J Pulp Pap Sci 28(9): 298-304.
9. Edgar CD, Gray DG (2003) Smooth model cellulose I surfaces from nanocrystal suspensions. Cellulose 10(4): 299-306.
10. Eichhorn S, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich N, Capadona J, Rowan S, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito A, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight A, Bismarck A, Berglund L, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45(1): 1-33. doi: 10. 1007/s10853-009-3874-0.
11. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9(6): 1579-1585. doi: 10. 1021/bm800038n.
12. Ishii D, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 12(3): 548-550. doi: 10. 1021/bm1013876.
13. Janarthanan S, Sain M (2006) Isolation of cellulose micro fibrils-an enzymatic approach. Bioresources 1(2): 176-188.
14. Martinez DM, Buckley K, Jivan S, Lindstrom A, Thiruvengadaswamy R, Olson JA, Ruth TJ, Kerekes RJ (2001) Characterizing the mobility of papermaking fibres during sedimentation. In: Baker CF (ed) The science of papermaking: transactions of the 12th fundamental research symposium, Oxford. The Pulp and Paper Fundamental Research Society, Bury, UK, pp 225-254.
15. Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2005) Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure. Appl Phy A Mater Sci Process 80(1): 155-159. doi: 10. 1007/s00339-003-2225-2.
16. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21(16): 1595-1598.
17. Qua E, Hornsby P, Sharma H, Lyons G (2011) Preparation and characterisation of cellulose nanofibres. J Mater Sci 46(18): 6029-6045. doi: 10. 1007/s10853-011-5565-x.
18. Raisanen KO, Paulapuro H, Karrila SJ (1995) The effects of retention aids, drainage conditions, and pretreatment of slurry on high-vacuum dewatering-a laboratory study. TAPPI J 78(4): 140-147.
19. Saito T, Isogai A (2006) Wet strength improvement of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose sheets prepared with cationic polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(3): 773-780. doi: 10. 1021/ie0611608.
20. Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 11(9): 2195-2198. doi: 10. 1021/bm100490s.
21. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3): 459-494. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-010-9405-y.
22. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16(1): 75-85. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-008-9244-2.
23. Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int 47(3): 291-294. doi: 10. 1002/(sici)1097-0126(199811)47: 3< 291: aid-pi11> 3. 0. co; 2-1.
24. Trovatti E, Oliveira L, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Pascoal Neto C, Cruz Pinto JJC, Gandini A (2010) Novel bacterial cellulose-acrylic resin nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 70(7): 1148-1153.
25. Tunç S, Duman O (2011) Preparation of active antimicrobial methyl cellulose/carvacrol/montmorillonitenanocomposite films and investigation of carvacrol release. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44(2): 465-472.
26. Xu L, Parker I (2000) Simulating the forming process with the moving belt drainage former. Appita J 53(4): 282-286.
27. Zhang LY, Tsuzuki T, Wang XG (2010) Preparation and characterization on cellulose nanofiber film. Mater Sci Forum 654-656: 1760-1763.