Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public-Private Governance

Information Systems Management

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 240-249

  Klievink, Bram ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

e government; governance; information infrastructures; public private collaboration; social innovation; transformation

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

E-GOVERNMENT; GOVERNANCE; INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURES; PUBLIC-PRIVATE; SOCIAL INNOVATIONS; TRANSFORMATION;

HARDWARE;

EID: 84904189473     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923268     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. De Bruijn, J. A., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (2008). Management in networks: On multi-actor decision making. London: Routledge.
2. De Bruijn, J. A., Ten Heuvelhof, E. F., & In 't Veld, R. J. (2010). Procesmanagement: Why project management fails in complex decision making processes (2nd ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead-Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3),467-494.
4. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304-321.
5. Constantinides, P. (2012). Perspectives and implications for the development of information infrastructures. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
6. El-Haddadeh, R., Weerakkody, V., & Al-Shafi, S. (2013). The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalization in the public sector. Information & Management, 50, 135-143.
7. Flinders, M. (2005). The politics of public-private partnerships. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (BJPIR), 7, 215-239.
8. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
10. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2007). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
11. Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1-19.
12. Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23-42.
13. Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations: Structural and power perspectives. In T. J. Hämäläinen & R. Heiskala (eds.), Social innovations, institutional change, and economic performance. Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial, regions, and societies sectors (pp. 52-79). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
14. Howaldt, J. R., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields, and international trends. Dortmund, Germany: TU Dortmund.
15. Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327-335.
16. Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation digital government infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233-237.
17. Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381.
18. Klievink, B., Janssen, M., & Tan, Y.-H. (2012). A stakeholder analysis of business-to-government information sharing: The governance of a public-private platform. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(4), 54-64.
19. Kumar, K., & Van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279-300.
20. Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to terms with the public-private partnership: A grammar of multiple meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 35-51.
21. Milward, H. B., Provan, K. G., Fish, A., Isett, K. R., & Huang, K. (2010). Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Supplement 1), i125-i141.
22. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969-1990.
23. Northrop, L., Feiler, P., Gabriel, R. P., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., Longstaff, T., Wallnau, K. (2006). Ultra-large-scale systems: The software challenge of the future-ultra-large-scale systems study report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute.
24. Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. EDPACS: The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, XXXII(6), 1-24.
25. Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
26. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Pongsiri, N. (2003). Public-private partnerships in Thailand: A case study of the electric utility industry. Public Policy and Administration, 18(3), 69.
28. Rosenau, P. V. (1999). Introduction. The strengths and weaknesses of public-private policy partnerships. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 10-34.
29. Rü, D., & Lurtz, K. (2012). Mapping the various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. EBS Business School Research Paper Series, 12(3), 1-51.
30. Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849-873.
32. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.
33. Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.
34. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
35. Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from e-government to t-government: A study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1-16.
36. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Zapf, W. (1991). The role of innovations in modernization theory. International Review of Sociology, 2(3), 83-94.