Subjective evaluation of luminance distribution for intelligent outdoor lighting

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 421-433

  Viliunas, V ^a   Vaitkeviius H ^a   Stanikunas, R ^a   Vitta, P ^a   Bliumas, R ^a   Auskalnyt A ^a   Tuzikas, A ^a   Petrulis, A ^a   Dabasinskas L ^a   Zukauskas A ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; SEMANTICS;

LUMINANCE DISTRIBUTIONS; MAJOR FACTORS; OPTIMISATIONS; PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALE; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE IMPRESSIONS; WELL BEING;

LUMINANCE;

EID: 84904185235     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477153513491760     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Boyce PR, Fotios S, Richards M. Road lighting and energy saving. Lighting Research and Technology. 2009 ; 41: 245-260
2. Li F, Chen D, Song X, Chen Y. LEDs: A promising energy-saving light source for road lighting: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Wuhan, China, Mar 28-31: 2009: 2798-2800.
3. Žukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Vitta P. Optimization of solid-state lamps for photobiologically friendly mesopic lighting. Applied Optics. 2012 ; 51: 8423-8432
4. Taguchi T, Uchida Y, Setomoto T, Kobashi K. Application of white LED lighting to energy-saving-type street lamps. Proceedings of the SPIE. 2001 ; 4278: 7-12 (Pubitemid 32637771)
5. De Kort YAW, Haans A, Geerdnick L, van Gennip D, Horst M, Servaes J. Psychological building blocks for dynamic road lighting: Understanding light's role in feelings of safety at night: LS-WLED 2010. Proceedings of the 12 International Symposium on Science and Technology of Light Sources and 3rd International Conference on White LEDs and Solid State Lighting, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Jul 11-16: 2010: 529-530.
6. Mendalka M, Gadaj M, Lukasz K, Nyka K. WSN for intelligent lighting system: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Technology, Gdansk, Poland, Jun 28-30: 2010: 99-100.
7. Atici Ç, Özçelebi T, Lukkien JJ. Exploring user-centered intelligent road lighting design: A road map and future research directions. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. 2011 ; 57: 788-793
8. Vitta P, Stanikunas R, Tuzikas A, Reklaitis I, Stonkus A, Petrulis A, Vaitkevi̧ius H, Žukauskas A. Energy-saving approaches to solid state street lighting. Proceedings of the SPIE. 2011 ; 8123: 81231H-1-81231H-11
9. Schreuder D Outdoor Lighting: Physics, Vision and Perception. Berlin: Springer ; 2008:
10. Boyce PR Lighting for Driving. Boca Raton: CRC Press ; 2009:
11. Shinar D Traffic Safety and Human Behaviour. Bingley: Emerald ; 2008:
12. Hargroves RA. Road lighting. IEE Proceedings. 1983 ; 130A: 420-441
13. Wanvik PO. Effects of road lighting: An analysis based on Dutch accident statistics 1987-2006. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2009 ; 41: 123-128
14. Road Lighting as an Accident Countermeasure, CIE Publication 93. Vienna: CIE ; 1992:
15. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 1: Spatial brightness. Lighting Research and Technology. 2011 ; 43: 143-157
16. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 2: Preferred appearance and visual acuity. Lighting Research and Technology. 2011 ; 43: 159-172
17. Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Hamilton BJ, Bruno LD. Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology. 2000 ; 32: 79-91
18. Walkey H, Orreveteläinen P, Barbur J, Halonen L, Goodman T, Alferdinck J, Freiding A, Szalmás A. Mesopic visual efficiency II: Reaction time experiments. Lighting Research and Technology. 2007 ; 39: 335-354 (Pubitemid 350268383)
19. Lewis AL. Visual performance as a function of spectral power distribution of light sources at luminances used for general outdoor lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society. 1999 ; 28: 37-42
20. He Y, Rea M, Bierman A, Bullough J. Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society. 1997 ; 26: 125-138
21. Lin Y, Chen W, Chen D, Shao H. The effect of spectrum on visual field in road lighting. Building and Environment. 2004 ; 39: 433-439 (Pubitemid 38135836)
22. Ishida T. Color identification data obtained from photopic to mesopic illuminance levels. Color Research and Application. 2002 ; 27: 252-259 (Pubitemid 34720753)
23. Shin JC, Yaguchi H, Shioiri S. Change of color appearance in photopic, mesopic and scotopic vision. Optical Review. 2004 ; 11: 265-271 (Pubitemid 39383710)
24. Yao Q, Sun Y, Lin Y. Research on facial recognition and color identification under CMH and HPS lamps for road lighting. Leukos. 2009 ; 6: 169-178
25. Mayeur A, Brémond R, Bastien JMC. Effects of the viewing context on target detection. Implications for road lighting design. Applied Ergonomics. 2010 ; 41: 461-468
26. Houser KW, Tiller DK. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Research and Technology. 2003 ; 35: 183-195
27. Zhou B, Yao Y. Evaluating information retrieval system performance based on user preference. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 2010 ; 34: 227-248
28. Cox EP III. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. Journal of Marketing Research. 1980 ; 17: 407-422
29. Coombs CH A Theory of Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons ; 1964 :
30. Snider G, Osgood CE Semantic Differential Technique: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine ; 1969 :
31. Tiller DK, Rea MS. Semantic differential scaling: Prospects in lighting research. Lighting Research and Technology. 1992 ; 24: 43-51
32. Trochim WMK, Donnelly JP The Research Methods Knowledge Base. 3 rd. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog, 2006. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog ; 2006 :
33. Loe L, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: Experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology. 1994 ; 26: 119-133
34. Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones CC, Heerwagen J, Myer M, Hunter CM. Lighting quality and office work: Two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research and Technology. 2006 ; 38: 191-223 (Pubitemid 44317299)
35. Mumcu S, Düzenli T, Özbilen A. Prospect and refuge as the predictors of preferences for seating areas. Scientific Research and Essays. 2010 ; 5: 1223-1233
36. Fotios S, Atli D. Comparing judgments of visual clarity and spatial brightness through an analysis of studies using the category rating procedure. Leukos. 2012 ; 8: 261-281
37. Himmelfarb S. The measurement of attitudes. In Eagly AH and Chaiken S, editors. Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993: 23-88.
38. Appleton J The Experience of Landscape. London: John Wiley and Sons ; 1975 :
39. Lorenz K King Solomon's Ring. London: Methuen ; 1964 :
40. Appleton J. Prospects and refuges revisited. In Nasar JL editor. Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1988: 27-44.
41. Robinson N Planting Design Handbook. Hants: Ashgate ; 2004 :
42. Siegel S, Castellan NJ Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2 nd. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 1988 :
43. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958 ; 23: 187-200
44. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960 ; 20: 141-151
45. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 1994 :
46. Haans A, de Kort YAW. Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2012 ; 32: 342-352