Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: Paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 183-195

  Houser, Kevin W ^a   Tiller, Dale K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENCE; ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL (SD) SCALES;

ELECTRIC LIGHTING;

EID: 0042524370     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1365782803li073oa     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Marsden AM. Brightness: a review of current knowledge. Lighting Res. Technol. 1969; 1: 171-81.
2. Marsden AM. Brightness-luminance relationships in an interior. Lighting Res. Technol. 1970; 2: 10-16.
3. Bodmann HW, LaToison M. Predicted brightness-luminance phenomena. Lighting Res. Technol. 1994; 26: 135-43.
4. Rea MS ed. IESNA lighting handbook: reference and application, 9th edition. New York: IESNA, 2000.
5. Collins BL, Fisher W, Marans RW. Second-level post-occupancy evaluation analysis. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 1990; 19: 21-44.
6. Collins BL. Evaluation of the role of luminance distributions in occupant response to lighting: CIBSE National Lighting Conference. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, 1990: 1-11.
7. Flynn JE. A study of the subjective responses to low energy and non-uniform lighting systems. Lighting Design and Application 1977; 7: 167-79.
8. Rowlands E, Loe DL, McIntosh RM, Mansfield KP. Lighting adequacy and quality in office interiors by consideration of subjective assessment and physical measurement. CIE Journal 1985; 4: 23-37.
9. Loe DL, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. Light patterns and their relevance to spatial appearance and the quality of the lit environment: Proceedings CIE 22nd session (Melbourne), 1991; 2: 41-44.
10. Tiller DK, Veitch JA. Perceived room brightness: pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution. Lighting Res. Technol. 1995; 27: 93-101.
11. Houser KW, Tiller DK, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG. The subjective response to linear fluorescent direct/indirect lighting systems. Lighting Res. Technol. 2002; 34: 243-64.
12. SYSTAT Software UK Limited. London, UK. Product details available at 〈www.systat.com〉.
13. Klockars AJ, Sax G. Multiple comparisons (Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1986.
14. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
15. Rea MS. Calibration of subjective scaling responses. Lighting Res. Technol. 1982; 14: 121-29.
16. Tiller DK. Toward a deeper understanding of the psychological aspects of lighting. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 1990; 19: 59-65.
17. Tiller DK, Rea MS. Semantic differential scaling: prospects in lighting research. Lighting Res. Technol. 1992; 24: 43-52.
18. Shepard RN. Representation of structure in similarity data: problems and prospects. Psychometriks 1974; 39: 373-421.
19. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs 2nd ed. London: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1957.
20. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 3rd ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1990.
21. Edwards AL. Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart and Co, 1950.
22. Newsham GR, Marchand RG, Veitch JA. Preferred surface luminances in offices by evolution: a pilot study. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, Salt Lake City, UT, August 2002.