Relative binding enthalpies from molecular dynamics simulations using a direct method

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 2759-2768

  Roy, Amitava ^a   Hua, Duy P ^a   Ward, Joshua M ^a,b   Post, Carol Beth ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904110938     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct500200n     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ward, J. M.; Gorenstein, N. M.; Tian, J.; Martin, S. F.; Post, C. B. Constraining Binding Hot Spots: NMR and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide a Structural Explanation for Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation in SH2-Ligand Binding J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (32) 11058-11070
2. Yu, B.; Martins, I. R. S.; Li, P.; Amarasinghe, G. K.; Umetani, J.; Fernandez-Zapico, M. E.; Billadeau, D. D.; Machius, M.; Tomchick, D. R.; Rosen, M. K. Structural and Energetic Mechanisms of Cooperative Autoinhibition and Activation of Vav1 Cell 2010, 140 (2) 246-256
3. Freire, E. A Thermodynamic Approach to the Affinity Optimization of Drug Candidates Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 74 (5) 468-472
4. Chaires, J. B. Calorimetry and Thermodynamics in Drug Design Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37 (1) 135-151
5. Makhatadze, G. I.; Privalov, P. L. Energetics of Protein Structure Adv. Protein Chem. 1995, 47, 307-425
6. Chodera, J. D.; Mobley, D. L. Entropy-Enthalpy Compensation: Role and Ramifications in Biomolecular Ligand Recognition and Design Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2013, 42 (1) 121-142
7. Reynolds, C. H.; Holloway, M. K. Thermodynamics of Ligand Binding and Efficiency ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (6) 433-437
8. Fenley, A. T.; Muddana, H. S.; Gilson, M. K. Entropy-Enthalpy Transduction Caused by Conformational Shifts Can Obscure the Forces Driving Protein-Ligand Binding Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109 (49) 20006-20011
9. Gallicchio, E.; Kubo, M. M.; Levy, R. M. Entropy-Enthalpy Compensation in Solvation and Ligand Binding Revisited J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120 (18) 4526-4527
10. Ford, D. M. Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation is Not a General Feature of Weak Association J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (46) 16167-16170
11. DeLorbe, J. E.; Clements, J. H.; Teresk, M. G.; Benfield, A. P.; Plake, H. R.; Millspaugh, L. E.; Martin, S. F. Thermodynamic and Structural Effects of Conformational Constraints in Protein-Ligand Interactions. Entropic Paradoxy Associated with Ligand Preorganization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (46) 16758-16770
12. Simonson, T.; Archontis, G.; Karplus, M. Free Energy Simulations Come of Age: Protein-Ligand Recognition Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35 (6) 430-437
13. Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular Receptors Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (15) 2644-2676
14. Lazaridis, T.; Karplus, M. Thermodynamics of Protein Folding: A Microscopic View Biophys. Chem. 2003, 100 (1-3) 367-395
15. Gilson, M. K.; Zhou, H. X. Calculation of Protein-ligand Binding Affinities Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36, 21-42
16. Christ, C. D.; Mark, A. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Basic Ingredients of Free Energy Calculations: A Review J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31 (8) 1569-1582
17. Deng, Y.; Roux, B. Computations of Standard Binding Free Energies with Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113 (8) 2234-2246
18. Gallicchio, E.; Levy, R. M. Advances in All Atom Sampling Methods for Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011, 21 (2) 161-166
19. Wereszczynski, J.; McCammon, J. A. Statistical Mechanics and Molecular Dynamics in Evaluating Thermodynamic Properties of Biomolecular Recognition Q. Rev. Biophys. 2012, 45 (01) 1-25
20. Karplus, M. Dynamical Aspects of Molecular Recognition J. Mol. Recog. 2010, 23 (2) 102-104
21. Genheden, S.; Ryde, U. Will Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proteins Ever Reach Equilibrium? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14 (24) 8662-8677
22. Levy, R. M.; Gallicchio, E. Computer Simulations with Explicit Solvent: Recent Progress in the Thermodynamic Decomposition of Free Energies and in Modeling Electrostatic Effects Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 531-567
23. Lu, N.; Kofke, D. A.; Woolf, T. B. Staging Is More Important than Perturbation Method for Computation of Enthalpy and Entropy Changes in Complex Systems J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (23) 5598-5611
24. Setny, P.; Baron, R.; McCammon, J. A. How Can Hydrophobic Association Be Enthalpy Driven? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6 (9) 2866-2871
25. Shi, Y.; Zhu, C. Z.; Martin, S. F.; Ren, P. Probing the Effect of Conformational Constraint on Phosphorylated Ligand Binding to an SH2 Domain Using Polarizable Force Field Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116 (5) 1716-1727
26. Wan, S.; Stote, R. H.; Karplus, M. Calculation of the Aqueous Solvation Energy and Entropy, as Well as Free Energy, Of Simple Polar Solutes J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121 (19) 9539-9548
27. Kubo, M. M.; Gallicchio, E.; Levy, R. M. Thermodynamic Decomposition of Hydration Free Energies by Computer Simulation: Application to Amines, Oxides, and Sulfides J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101 (49) 10527-10534
28. Davidson, J. P.; Martin, S. F. Use of 1,2,3-Trisubstituted Cyclopropanes As Conformationally Constrained Peptide Mimics in SH2 Antagonists Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41 (49) 9459-9464
29. Davidson, J. P.; Lubman, O.; Rose, T.; Waksman, G.; Martin, S. F. Calorimetric and Structural Studies of 1,2,3-Trisubstituted Cyclopropanes As Conformationally Constrained Peptide Inhibitors of Src SH2 Domain Binding J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (2) 205-215
30. Waksman, G.; Shoelson, S. E.; Pant, N.; Cowburn, D.; Kuriyan, J. Binding of a High Affinity Phosphotyrosyl Peptide to the Src SH2 Domain: Crystal Structures of the Complexed and Peptide-Free Forms Cell 1993, 72 (5) 779-790
31. Brooks, B. R.; Brooks, C. L., 3rd; Mackerell, A. D., Jr.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R. J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S.; Caflisch, A.; Caves, L.; Cui, Q.; Dinner, A. R.; Feig, M.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Hodoscek, M.; Im, W.; Kuczera, K.; Lazaridis, T.; Ma, J.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Paci, E.; Pastor, R. W.; Post, C. B.; Pu, J. Z.; Schaefer, M.; Tidor, B.; Venable, R. M.; Woodcock, H. L.; Wu, X.; Yang, W.; York, D. M.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: The Biomolecular Simulation Program J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30 (10) 1545-1614
32. Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kalé, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable Molecular Dynamics with NAMD J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (16) 1781-1802
33. MacKerell, A. D. J.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; McCarthy, J. D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattos, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E.; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stote, R.; Straub, J.; Karplus, M. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616
34. MacKerell, A. D.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L. Improved Treatment of the Protein Backbone in Empirical Force Fields J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (3) 698-699
35. Caves, L. S. D.; Evanseck, J. D.; Karplus, M. Locally Accessible Conformations of Proteins: Multiple Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Crambin Protein Sci. 1998, 7 (3) 649-666
36. Monticelli, L.; Sorin, E. J.; Tieleman, D. P.; Pande, V. S.; Colombo, G. Molecular Simulation of Multistate Peptide Dynamics: A Comparison between Microsecond Timescale Sampling and Multiple Shorter Trajectories J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29 (11) 1740-1752
37. Genheden, S.; Ryde, U. How to Obtain Statistically Converged MM/GBSA Results J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31 (4) 837-846
38. Grossfield, A.; Zuckerman, D. M. Quantifying Uncertainty and Sampling Quality in Biomolecular Simulations. In Ann. Rep. Comput. Chem., Ralph, A. W., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, 2009; Vol. 5, Ch. 2, pp 23-48.
39. Sugita, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics Method for Protein Folding Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314 (1-2) 141-151
40. Christen, M.; van Gunsteren, W. F. On Searching in, Sampling of, and Dynamically Moving through Conformational Space of Biomolecular Systems: A Review J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29 (2) 157-166
41. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy Stat. Sci. 1986, 1 (1) 54-75
42. Straub, J. E.; Rashkin, A. B.; Thirumalai, D. Dynamics in Rugged Energy Landscapes with Applications to the S-Peptide and Ribonuclease A J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116 (5) 2049-2063