Influence of a psychological perspective on scene viewing and memory for scenes

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1372-1387

  Kaakinen, Johanna K ^a   Hyönä, Jukka ^a   Viljanen, Minna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Scene perception; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; RECALL; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; TIME; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 80051764497     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.548872     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.
2. Benson, V., Piper, J., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2009). Atypical saccadic scanning in autistic spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1178-1182.
3. Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040.
5. Castelhano, M. S., Mack, M. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-15.
6. DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17, 790-811.
7. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauer, U., & Koch, C. (2008). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-19.
8. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). Can the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual saliency in scene perception? Perception, 36, 1123-1138.
9. Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Radin, D. I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 500-510.
10. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
11. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
12. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and longterm scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 396-411.
13. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
14. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203.
15. Kaakinen, J. K. (2010a). Experimental materials published on March 9, 2010. Retrieved from http://users.utu.fi/johkaa/Materials/picture_set.zip
16. Kaakinen, J. K. (2010b). Experimental materials published on April 23, 2010. Retrieved from http://users.utu.fi/johkaa/Materials/recognition_set.zip
17. Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 319-334.
18. Koutstaal, W., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 555-583.
19. Masciocchi, C. M., Mihalas, S., Parkhurst, D., & Niebur, E. (2009). Everyone knows what is interesting: Salient locations which should be fixated. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-22.
20. McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139.
21. Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6, 8-17.
22. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45, 205-231.
23. Nystrom, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2008). Semantic override of low-level features in image viewing-both initially and overall. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1-11.
24. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123.
25. Peters, R. J., & Itti, L. (2007). Beyond bottom-up: Incorporating task-dependent influences into a computational model of spatial attention. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 1-8.
26. Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309-315.
27. Reynolds, R. E., Trathen, W., Sawyer, M. L., & Shepard, C. R. (1993). Causal and epiphenomenal use of the selective attention strategy in prose comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 258-278.
28. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 1-18.
29. Tatler, B. W. (2009). Current understanding of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17, 777-789.
30. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Land, M. F. (2005). Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 931-960.
31. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Rusted, J. (2003). The time course of abstract visual representation. Perception, 32, 579-592.
32. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
33. Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1931-1949.
34. Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., van Loon, E., Humphreys, L., & Bloyce, J. (2006). Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 321-343.
35. University of Southern California, iLab, & Itti, L. (2002-2004). ILabC ++ Neuromorphic Vision Toolkit [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Retrieved January 24, 2011, from http://ilab.usc.deu/toolkit/
36. Van Zoest, W., Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Representations in visual cognition: It's about time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 116-120.
37. Vincent, B. T., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. T. (2007). Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection. Vision Research, 47, 1809-1820.
38. Walczyk, J. J., & Hall, V. C. (1991). A developmental study of children's ability to adopt perspectives and find errors in text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 2-17.
39. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99-119). New York, NY: Oxford.
40. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum.