Multivariate statistical models of metabolomic data reveals different metabolite distribution patterns in isonitrosoacetophenone-elicited Nicotiana tabacum and Sorghum bicolor cells

SpringerPlus

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-10

  Madala, Ntakadzeni E ^a   Piater, Lizelle A ^a   Steenkamp, Paul A ^a,b   Dubery, Ian A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

^b DSI CSIR Nanotechnology Innovation Centre   (South Africa)

Author keywords

HCA; Isonitrosoacetophenone; Metabolic trees; Metabolomics; Nicotiana tabacum; OPLS DA; PCA; Sorghum bicolor; SUS; UHPLC Q TOF MS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904014565     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-254     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allwood JW, Goodacre R: Introduction to liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry instrumentation applied in plant metabolomic analyses. Phytochem Anal 2010, 21: 33-47.
2. Bak S, Olsen CE, Halkier BA, Møller BL: Transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis plants expressing the two multifunctional sorghum cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP79A1 and CYP71E1, are cyanogenic and accumulate metabolites derived from intermediates. Plant Physiol 2000, 123: 1437-1448.
3. Bylesj M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J: OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification. J Chemomet 2006, 20: 341-351.
4. Downs GM, Barnard JM: Clustering methods and their uses in computational chemistry. In Reviews in computational chemistry. Edited by: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB. UK: Wiley; 2002: 1-40.
5. Dubery IA, Holzapfel CW, Kruger CJ, Schabort JC, van Dyk M: Characterization of a gamma-radiation induced antifungal stress metabolite in citrus peel. Phytochemistry 1988, 27: 2769-2772.
6. Dubery IA, Louw AE, van Heerden FR: Synthesis and evaluation of 4-(3-methyl-2 butenoxy) isonitrosoacetophenone, a radiation-induced stress metabolite in Citrus. Phytochemistry 1999, 50: 983-989.
7. Dunn WB, Bailey NJC, Johnson HE: Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst 2005, 130: 606-625.
8. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dormann P, Altmann T, Tretheway RN, Willmitzer L: Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18: 1157-1161.
9. Gerber IB, Dubery IA: Fluorescence microplate assay for the detection of oxidative burst products in tobacco cell suspensions using 2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescein. Meth Cell Sci 2003, 25: 115-122.
10. Goodacre R: Metabolomics of a superorganism. J Nutr 2007, 137: 259-266.
11. Hall RD: Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. New Phytol 2006, 169: 453-468.
12. Halouska S, Fenton RJ, Barletta RG, Powers R: Predicting thein vivomechanism of action for drug leads using NMR metabolomics. Am Chem Soc Chem Biol 2012, 7: 166-171.
13. Jolliffe IT: Principal component analysis. 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2002.
14. Kim HK, Choi YH, Verpoorte R: NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants. Nat Protocols 2010, 5: 536-549.
15. Kopka J, Fernie A, Weckwerth W, Gibon Y, Stitt M: Metabolite profiling in plant biology: platforms and destinations. Genome Biol 2004, 5: e109.
16. Lin CY, Viant MR, Tjeerdema RS: Metabolomics: methodologies and applications in the environmental sciences. J Pest Sci 2006, 31: 245-251.
17. Lu X, Zhao X, Bai C, Zhao C, Lu G, Xu G: LC-MS-based metabonomics analysis. J Chrom B 2008, 866: 64-76.
18. Madala NE, Piater LA, Steenkamp PA, Dubery IA: Biotransformation of isonitrosoacetophenone (2-keto-2-phenyl-acetaldoxime) in tobacco cell suspensions. Biotech Lett 2012, 34: 1351-1356.
19. Madala NE, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Dubery IA: Collision energy alteration during mass spectrometric acquisition is essential to ensure unbiased metabolomic-based analyses. Analyt Bioanalyt Chem 2012, 404: 367-372.
20. Madala NE, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Dubery IA: Metabolomic analysis of isonitrosoacetophenone-induced perturbations in phenolic metabolism ofNicotiana tabacumcells. Phytochemistry 2013, 94: 82-90.
21. Madala NE, Tugizimana F, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Dubery IA: The short and long of it: shorter chromatographic analysis suffice for sample classification during UPLC-MS based metabolic fingerprinting. Chromatographia 2013, 75: 279-285.
22. Møller BL: Dynamic metabolons. Science 2010, 330: 1328-1329.
23. Neilson EH, Goodger JQD, Woodrow IE, Møller BL: Plant chemical defense: at what cost?Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18: 250-258.
24. Ngara R, Rees J, Ndimba BK: Establishment of sorghum cell suspension culture system for proteomics studies. Afr J Biotech 2008, 7: 744-749.
25. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E: 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuliviamultivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 1998, 29: 1181-1189.
26. Oliver SG, Winson MK, Kell DB, Baganz F: Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol 1998, 16: 373-378.
27. Olivier I, Loots DT: A metabolomics approach to characterise and identify various Mycobacterium species. J Microbiol Meth 2012, 88: 419-426.
28. Omiecinski CJ, Heuvel JPV, Perdew GH, Peters JM: Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol Sci 2011, 120: 49-75.
29. Plumb RS, Wilson ID: High throughput and high sensitivity LC/MS-OA-TOF and UPLC/TOF-MS for the identification of biomarkers of toxicity and disease using a metabonomics approach. Abstr Am Chem Soc 2004, 228: U164.
30. Pollier J, Mosesab T, Goossens A: Combinatorial biosynthesis in plants: a review on its potential and future exploitation. Nat Prod Rep 2011, 28: 1897-1916.
31. Retief JD: Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP. Meth Molec Biol 2000, 132: 243-258.
32. Robertson DG: Metabonomics in toxicology: a review. Toxicol Sci 2005, 85: 809-822.
33. Saccenti E, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, Hendriks MMWB: Reflections on univariate and multivariate analysis of metabolomics data. Metabolomics 2014, 10: 361-374.
34. Sanabria NM, Dubery IA: Differential display profiling of theNicotianaresponse to LPS reveals elements of plant basal resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 344: 1001-1007.
35. Sato S, Arita M, Soga T, Nishioka T, Tomita M: Time-resolved metabolomics reveals metabolic modulation in rice foliage. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 13: 1-13.
36. Shiryaeva L, Antti H, Schröder WP, Strimbeck R, Shiriaev AS: Pair-wise multicomparison and OPLS analyses of cold-acclimation phases in Siberian spruce. Metabolomics 2012, 8: S123-S130.
37. Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Bijlsma S, Rubingh CM, Vis DJ, Jellema RH, Pijl H, Roelfsema F, van der Greef J: Dynamic metabolomic data analysis: a tutorial review. Metabolomics 2010, 6: 3-17.
38. Steinbach M, Ertoz L, Kumar V: The challenges of clustering high dimensional data. In. Springer, Berlin, Germany: New directions in statistical physics; 2004: 273-309.
39. Theodoridis H, Gika G, Wilson ID: Mass spectrometry-based holistic analytical approaches for metabolite profiling in systems biology studies. Mass Spec Rev 2011, 30: 884-906.
40. Trygg J, Wold S: Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemomet 2002, 16: 119-128.
41. Tugizimana F, Piater LA, Dubery IA: Plant metabolomics: a new frontier in phytochemical analysis. Sth Afr J Sci 2013, 109: 1-11.
42. Tugizimana F, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Dubery IA: Multi-platform metabolomic analyses of ergosterol-induced dynamic changes inNicotiana tabacumcells. PloS ONE 2014, 9: e87846. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0087 846.
43. van der Greef J, Smilde AK: Symbiosis of chemometrics and metabolomics: past, present, and future. J Chemometr 2005, 19: 376-386.
44. van der Greef J, Stroobant P, van der Heijden R: The role of analytical sciences medical systems biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004, 8: 559-565.
45. Viant MR: Metabolomics of aquatic organisms: the new 'omics' on the block. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 2007, 332: 301-306.
46. Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963, 58: 236-245.
47. Weckwerth W, Morgenthal K: Metabolomics: from pattern recognition to biological interpretation. Drug Disc Today 2005, 10: 1551-1558.
48. Werth MT, Halouska S, Shortridge MD, Zhang B, Powers R: Analysis of metabolomic PCA data using tree diagrams. Analyt Biochem 2010, 399: 58-63.
49. Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjostrom L, Mellerowicz EJ, Edlund U, Shockcor JP, Gottfried J, Moritz T, Trygg J: Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Analyt Chem 2008, 80: 115-122.
50. Wilson ID, Nicholson JK, Castro-Perez J, Granger JH, Johnson KA, Smith BW, Plumb RS: High resolution "Ultra performance" liquid chromatography coupled to oa-TOF mass spectrometry as a tool for differential metabolic pathway profiling in functional genomic studies. J Proteom Res 2005, 4: 591-598.
51. Yamamoto H, Yamaji H, Abe Y, Harada K, Waluyo D, Fukusaki E, Kondo A, Ohno H, Fukuda H: Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems dimensionality reduction for metabolome data using PCA, PLS, OPLS, and RFDA with differential penalties to latent variables. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2009, 98: 136-142.