Analysis of metabolomic PCA data using tree diagrams

Analytical Biochemistry

Volumn 399, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-63

  Werth, Mark T ^a   Halouska, Steven ^b   Shortridge, Matthew D ^b   Zhang, Bo ^b   Powers, Robert ^b  

^a NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bootstrap analysis; Metabolomics; NMR; Principal component analysis; Tree diagrams

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; GRAPHIC METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

BOOTSTRAP ANALYSIS; DISTANCE MATRICES; LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA; METABOLOMIC STUDY; METABOLOMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT; TREE DIAGRAM; VISUAL INSPECTION;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

URATE OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS NIDULANS; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FUNGAL METABOLISM; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; METABOLOMICS; MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77649180718     PISSN: 00032697     EISSN: 10960309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Powers R. NMR metabolomics and drug discovery. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2009, 47:S2-S11.
2. Coen M., Holmes E., Lindon J.C., Nicholson J.K. NMR-based metabolic profiling and metabonomic approaches to problems in molecular toxicology. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21:9-27.
3. Nebert D.W., Vesell E.S. Can personalized drug therapy be achieved? A closer look at pharmaco-metabonomics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27:580-586.
4. Rezzi S., Ramadan Z., Fay L.B., Kochhar S. Nutritional metabonomics: applications and perspectives. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:513-525.
5. Robertson D.G., Reily M.D., Baker J.D. Metabonomics in pharmaceutical discovery and development. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:526-539.
6. Holmes E., Antti H. Chemometric contributions to the evolution of metabonomics: mathematical solutions to characterising and interpreting complex biological NMR spectra. Analyst 2002, 127:1549-1557.
7. Trygg J., Holmes E., Lundstedt T. Chemometrics in metabonomics. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:469-479.
8. Wold S., Sjostrom M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58:109-130.
9. Stoyanova R., Brown T.R. NMR spectral quantitation by principal component analysis. NMR Biomed. 2001, 14:271-277.
10. Lindon J.C., Holmes E., Nicholson J.K. Pattern recognition methods and applications in biomedical magnetic resonance. Prog. Nuclear Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2001, 39:1-40.
11. Xia J., Psychogios N., Young N., Wishart D.S. MetaboAnalyst: A web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W652-W660.
12. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45:5-32.
13. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 1995, 20:273-297.
14. Coomans D., Broeckaert I., Derde M.P., Tassin A., Massart D.L., Wold S. Use of a microcomputer for the definition of multivariate confidence regions in medical diagnosis based on clinical laboratory profiles. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1984, 17:1-14.
15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
16. Efron B., Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am. Stat. 1983, 37:36-48.
17. Efron B., Halloran E., Holmes S. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93:13429-13434.
18. Fiehn O. Metabolomics: the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 48:155-171.
19. Roessner U., Bowne J. What is metabolomics all about?. Biotechniques 2009, 46:363-365.
20. Pietra F. Evolution of the secondary metabolite versus evolution of the species. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74:2207-2211.
21. Smedsgaard J., Nielsen J. Metabolite profiling of fungi and yeast: from phenotype to metabolome by MS and informatics. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56:273-286.
22. Maharjan R.P., Ferenci T. Metabolomic diversity in the species Escherichia coli and its relationship to genetic population structure. Metabolomics 2005, 1:235-242.
23. M.-Z. Ding, X. Zhou, Y.-J. Yuan, Metabolome profiling reveals adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during repeated vacuum fermentations, Metabolomics, in press, available from doi:10.1007/s11306-009-0173-3.
24. Oh S.J., Joung J.-G., Chang J.-H., Zhang B.-T. Construction of phylogenetic trees by kernel-based comparative analysis of metabolic networks. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7:284-296.
25. Mazurie A., Bonchev D., Schwikowski B., Buck G.A. Phylogenetic distances are encoded in networks of interacting pathways. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2579-2585.
26. Beckonert O., Bollard M.E., Ebbels T.M.D., Keun H.C., Antti H., Holmes E., Lindon J.C., Nicholson J.K. NMR-based metabonomic toxicity classification: Hierarchical cluster analysis and k-nearest-neighbour approaches. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 490:3-15.
27. Forgue P., Halouska S., Werth M., Xu K., Harris S., Powers R. NMR metabolic profiling of Aspergillus nidulans to monitor drug and protein activity. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5:1916-1923.
28. Halouska S., Chacon O., Fenton R.J., Zinniel D.K., Barletta R.G., Powers R. Use of NMR metabolomics to analyze the targets of d-cycloserine in mycobacteria: role of d-alanine racemase. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:4608-4614.
29. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package. Cladistics 1989, 5:164-166.
30. Retief J.D. Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 132:243-258.
31. Fitch W.M., Margoliash E. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 1967, 155:279-284.
32. Cotton James A., Wilkinson M. Majority-rule supertrees. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:445-452.
33. Verouden M.P.H., Westerhuis J.A., van der Werf M.J., Smilde A.K. Exploring the analysis of structured metabolomics data. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009, 98:88-96.