Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1789, 2014, Pages

  Atton, N ^a   Galef, B J ^b   Hoppitt, W ^c   Webster, M M ^a   Laland, K N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Innovation; Social information; Social learning; Social network; Social organization

Indexed keywords

FISH; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; MOVEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

EID: 84904011989     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0579     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Hoare DJ, Ruxton GD, Godin JGJ, Krause J. 2000 The social organization of free-ranging fish shoals. Oikos 89, 546-554. (doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2000. 890314. x).
2. Krause J, Hoare DJ, Croft D, Lawrence J, Ward A, Ruxton GD, James R. 2000 Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2011-2017. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2000. 1243).
3. Krause J, Butlin RK, Peuhkuri N, Pritchard VL. 2000b The social organization of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field. Biol. Rev. 75, 477-501. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-185X. 2000. tb00052. x).
4. Krause J, Ruxton GD. 2002 Living in groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Coussi-Korbel S, Fragaszy DM. 1995 On the relation between social dynamics and social learning. Anim. Behav. 50, 1441-1453. (doi: 10. 1016/0003-3472 (95)80001-8).
6. Ward AJ, Hart PJ. 2003 The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fish. 4, 348-358. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1467-2979. 2003. 00135. x).
7. Griffiths SW, Ward AJW. 2011 Social recognition of conspecifics. In Fish cognition and behavior (eds C Brown, K Laland, J Krause), pp. 186-216. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Magurran AE, Currie S, Krause J. 2009 Species and population differences in social recognition between fishes: a role for ecology? Behav. Ecol. 20, 511-516. (doi: 10. 1093/beheco/arp025).
9. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. 1997 Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim. Behav. 53, 945-949. (doi: 10. 1006/anbe. 1996. 0315).
10. Olsén KH, Grahn M, Lohm J. 2003 The influence of dominance and diet on individual odours in MHC identical juvenile Arctic charr siblings. J. Fish Biol. 63, 855-862. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1095-8649. 2003. 00185. x).
11. Ward AJ, Hart PJ, Krause J. 2004 The effects of habitat-and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 15, 925-929. (doi: 10. 1093/beheco/arh097).
12. Ward AJ, Holbrook RI, Krause J, Hart PJ. 2005 Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 575-583. (doi: 10. 1007/s00265-004-0901-7).
13. Ward AJ, Webster MM, Hart PJ. 2007 Social recognition in wild fish populations. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1071-1077. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2006. 0231).
14. Webster MM, Ward AJW, Hart PJB. 2008 Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: intertaxa use of socially transmitted cues. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 203-208. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2007. 1178).
15. Webster MM, Adams EL, Laland KN. 2008 Diet-specific chemical cues influence association preferences and prey patch use in a shoaling fish. Anim. Behav. 76, 17-23. (doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2007. 12. 010).
16. Bryant BP, Atema J. 1987 Diet manipulation affects social behavior of catfish. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1645-1661. (doi: 10. 1007/BF00980206).
17. Courtenay SC, Quinn TP, Dupuis HMC, Groot C, Larkin PA. 1997 Factors affecting the recognition of population-specific odours by juvenile coho salmon. J. Fish Biol. 50, 1042-1060.
18. Moore A, Ives MJ, Kell LT. 1994 The role of urine in sibling recognition in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (L.) parr. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 173-180. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 1994. 0025).
19. Matsumura K, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N. 2004 Possible involvement of phosphatidylcholine in school recognition in the catfish, Plotosus lineatus. Zool. Sci. 21, 257-264. (doi: 10. 2108/zsj. 21. 257).
20. Lachlan RF, Crooks L, Laland KN. 1998 Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies. Anim. Behav. 56, 181-190. (doi: 10. 1006/anbe. 1998. 0760).
21. Laland KN, Williams K. 1997 Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies. Anim. Behav. 53, 1161-1169. (doi: 10. 1006/anbe. 1996. 0318).
22. Reader SM, Laland KN. 2000 Diffusion of foraging innovations in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 60, 175-180. (doi: 10. 1006/anbe. 2000. 1450).
23. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN. 2001 Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 62, 591-598. (doi: 10. 1006/anbe. 2001. 1788).
24. Croft DP, Arrowsmith BJ, Bielby J, Skinner K, White E, Couzin ID, Krause J. 2003 Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Oikos 100, 429-438. (doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2003. 12023. x).
25. Franz M, Nunn CL. 2009 Network-based diffusion analysis: a new method for detecting social learning. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1829-1836. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2008. 1824).
26. Hoppitt W, Boogert NJ, Laland KN. 2010 Detecting social transmission in networks. J. Theor. Biol. 263, 544-555. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jtbi. 2010. 01. 004).
27. Allen J, Weinrich M, Hoppitt W, Rendell L. 2013 Network-based diffusion analysis reveals cultural transmission of lobtail feeding in humpback whales. Science 340, 485-488. (doi: 10. 1126/science. 1231976).
28. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Sheldon BC. 2012 Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4199-4205. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2012. 1591).
29. Atton N, Hoppitt W, Webster MM, Galef BG, Laland KN. 2012 Information flow through threespine stickleback networks without social transmission. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4272-4278. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2012. 1462).
30. Webster MM, Atton N, Hoppitt WJ, Laland KN. 2013 Environmental complexity influences association network structure and network-based diffusion of foraging information in fish shoals. Am. Nat. 181, 235-244. (doi: 10. 1086/668825).
31. Coolen I, Bergen YV, Day RL, Laland KN. 2003 Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2413-2419. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2003. 2525).
32. van Bergen Y, Coolen I, Laland KN. 2004 Ninespined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 957-962. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2004. 2684).
33. Laland KN, Atton N, Webster MM. 2011 From fish to fashion: experimental and theoretical insights into the evolution of culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 958-968. (doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2010. 0328).
34. Frommen JG, Luz C, Bakker T. 2007 Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition. Ethology 113, 276-282. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0310. 2006. 01316. x).
35. Webster MM, Laland KN. 2011 Reproductive state affects reliance on public information in sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 619-627. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2010. 1562).
36. Webster MM, Laland KN. 2009 Evaluation of a noninvasive tagging system for laboratory studies using three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. J. Fish Biol. 75, 1868-1873. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1095-8649. 2009. 02374. x).
37. Pitcher TJ, Parish JK. 1993 Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In Behaviour of teleost fishes (ed. TJ Pitcher), pp. 363-440. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
38. Webster MM, Goldsmith J, Ward AJW, Hart PJB. 2007 Habitat-specific chemical cues influence association preferences and shoal cohesion in fish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 273-280. (doi: 10. 1007/s00265-007-0462-7).
39. Croft DP, James R, Krause J. 2008 Exploring animal social networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Dekker D, Krachhardt D, Snijders T. 2007 Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika 72, 563-581. (doi: 10. 1007/s11336-007-9016-1).
41. Manly B. 2008 Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
42. R Development Core Team. 2013 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. See http://www. R-project. org/.
43. Hoppitt W, Laland KN. 2013 Social learning: an introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002 Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer.
45. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF. 1995 Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas): implications for antipredator behaviour. Can. J. Zool. 73, 955-960. (doi: 10. 1139/z95-111).
46. Atton N, Galef B, Hoppitt W, Webster M, Laland K. 2014 Data from: familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals. Dryad Digital Repository. (doi: 10. 5061/dryad. 1mq62).