Reproductive state affects reliance on public information in sticklebacks

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1705, 2011, Pages 619-627

  Webster, M M ^a   Laland, K N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diffusion; Foraging; Group; Producer scrounger; Social learning; Transmission

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; TELEOST;

ANIMALIA; PUNGITIUS; PUNGITIUS PUNGITIUS;

EID: 79551646746     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1562     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. 1985 Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Henrich, J. & McElreath, R. 2003 The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 12, 123-135. (doi:10. 1002/evan. 10110)
3. Laland, K. N. 2004 Social learning strategies. Learn. Behav. 32, 4-14.
4. Feldman, M., Aoki, K. & Kumm, J. 1996 Individual versus social learning: evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Anthropol. Sci. 104, 209-231.
5. Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J. & Templeton, J. J. 2002 Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1559-1566. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1065)
6. Kendal, R. L., Coolen, I., Van Bergen, Y. & Laland, K. N. 2005 Tradeoffs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv. Stud. Behav. 35, 333-379. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454 (05) 35008-X)
7. Rendell, L. et al. 2010 Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328, 208-213. (doi:10.1126/science. 1184719)
8. van Bergen, Y., Coolen, I. & Laland, K. N. 2004 Ninespined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 957-962. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2004.2684)
9. Kendal, J. R., Rendell, L., Pike, T. W. & Laland, K. N. 2009 Nine-spined sticklebacks deploy a hill-climbing social learning strategy. Behav. Ecol. 20, 238-244. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp016)
10. Webster, M. M. & Laland, K. N. 2008 Social learning strategies and predation risk: minnows copy only when using private information would be costly. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2869-2876. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0817)
11. Briggs, S., Godin, J.-G. J. & Dugatkin, L. A. 1996 Mate choice copying under predation risk in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. 7, 151-157. (doi:10.1093/beheco/7.2.151)
12. Galef, B. G. & Whiskin, E. E. 2006 Increased reliance on socially acquired information while foraging in risky situations? Anim. Behav. 72, 1169-1176. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2006.05.003)
13. Duffy, G. A., Pike, T. W. & Laland, K. N. 2009 Size-dependent directed social learning in nine-spined sticklebacks. Anim. Behav. 78, 371-375. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav. 2009.05.015)
14. Pike, T. W., Kendal, J. R., Rendell, L. & Laland, K. N. 2010 Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish. Behav. Ecol. 21, 570-575.
15. Pike, T. W. & Laland, K. N. 2010 Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions. Biol. Lett. 6, 466-468. (doi:10.1098/rsbl. 2009.1014)
16. Magnhagen, C. 1991 Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 183-185. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347 (91) 90210-O)
17. Candolin, U. 1997 Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 81-87. (doi:10.1007/s002650050367)
18. Trexler,. J. C., Tempe, R. C. & Travis, J. 1994 Sizeselective predation of sailfin mollies by two species of heron. Oikos 69, 250-258. (doi:10.2307/3546145)
19. Cooper, W. E., Vitt, L. J., Hedges, R. & Huey, R. B. 1990 Locomotor impairment and defense in gravid lizards (Eumeces laticeps)-behavioral shift in activity may offset costs of reproduction in an active forager. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 153-157.
20. Roelke, D. L. & Sogard, S. M. 1993 Gender-based differences in habitat selection and activity level in the northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus). Copeia 2, 528-532.
21. Hoogland, J. L., Cannon, K. E., De Barbieri, L. M. & Manno, T. G. 2006 Selective predation on Utah prairie dogs. Am. Nat. 168, 546-552.
22. Coolen, I., Van Bergen, Y., Day, R. L. & Laland, K. N. 2003 Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2413-2419. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2525)
23. Coolen, I. & Giraldeau, L. A. 2003 Incompatibility between antipredatory vigilance and scrounger tactic in nutmeg mannikins, Lonchura punctulata. Anim. Behav. 66, 657-664. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2236)
24. Shaffer, L. R. & Formanowicz, D. R. 1996 A cost of viviparity and parental care in scorpions: reduced sprint speed and behavioural compensation. Anim. Behav. 51, 1017-1023. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0104)
25. James, R. S. & Johnston, I. A. 1998 Influence of spawning on swimming performance and muscle contractile properties in the short-horn sculpin. J. Fish Biol. 53, 485-501. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00997.x)
26. Valone, T. J. 1989 Group foraging, public information and patch estimation. Oikos 56, 357-363. (doi:10. 2307/3565621)
27. Coolen, I., Ward, A., Hart, P. & Laland, K. N. 2005 Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues. Behav. Ecol. 16, 865-870. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ari064)
28. Webster, M. M. & Hart, P. J. B. 2006 Subhabitat selection by foraging threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): previous experience and social conformity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60, 77-86. (doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0143-3)
29. Rodewald, A. D. & Foster, S. D. 1998 Effects of gravidity on habitat use and antipredator behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks. J. Fish Biol. 52, 973-984. (doi:10.1111/j. 1095-8649.1998.tb00597.x)
30. Frommen, J. G., Mehlis, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. 2009 Predator-inspection behaviour in female three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus is associated with status of gravidity. J. Fish Biol. 75, 2143-2153. (doi:10. 1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02408.x)
31. Evans, J. P., Gasparini, C. & Pilastro, A. 2007 Female guppies shorten brood retention in response to predator cues. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 719-727. (doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0302-1)
32. Ruxton, G. D., Speed, M. P. & Kelly, D. J. 2004 What, if anything, is the adaptive function of countershading? Anim. Behav. 68, 445-451. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2003.12.009)
33. Stanley, B. G. & Wootton, R. J. 1986 Effects of ration and male density on the territoriality and nest building of male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L). Anim. Behav. 34, 527-535. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472 (86) 80121-X)
34. Chellappa, S. & Huntingford, F. A. 1989 Depletion of energy reserves during reproductive aggression in male 3-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J. Fish Biol. 35, 315-316. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb02982.x)
35. Fitzgerald, G. J., Guderley, H. & Picard, P. 1989 Hidden reproductive costs in the threespine stickleback. Exp. Biol. 48, 295-300.
36. Dufresne, F., FitzGerald, G. J. & Lachance, S. 1990 Age and size-related differences in reproductive success and reproductive costs in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav. Ecol. 1, 140-147. (doi:10.1093/beheco/1.2.140)
37. Smith, C. & Wootton, R. J. 1999 Parental energy expenditure of the male three-spined stickleback. J. Fish Biol. 54, 1132-1136. (doi:10.1111/j.1095- 8649.1999. tb00866.x)
38. Brown, G. P. & Shine, R. 2004 Maternal nest-site choice and offspring fitness in a tropical snake (Tropidonophis mairii, Colubridae). Ecology 85, 1627-1634. (doi:10. 1890/03-0107)
39. Schwartzkopf, L. & Shine, R. 1992 Costs of reproduction in lizards: escape tactics and susceptibility to predation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 17-25.
40. Charland, M. B. & Gregory, P. T. 1995 Movements and habitat use in gravid and non-gravid female garter snakes (Colubridae: Thamnophis). J. Zool. 236, 543-561. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02731.x)
41. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
42. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.) 1988 Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43. Webster, M. M., Atton, N., Ward, A. J. W. & Hart, P. J. B. 2007 Turbidity and foraging rate in threespine sticklebacks: the importance of visual and chemical prey cues. Behaviour 144, 1347-1360. (doi:10.1163/ 156853907782418222)
44. Webster, M. M., Goldsmith, J., Ward, A. J. W. & Hart, P. J. B. 2007 Habitat-specific chemical cues influence association preferences and shoal cohesion in fish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 273-280. (doi:10.1007/s00265-007- 0462-7)
45. Uryu, Y., Iwasaki, K. & Hinoue, M. 1996 Laboratory experiments on behaviour and movement of a freshwater mussel, Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker). J. Mollusc. Stud. 62, 327-341. (doi:10.1093/mollus/62.3.327)
46. Mashoodh, R., Sinal, C. J. & Perrot-Sinal, T. S. 2009 Predation threat exerts specific effects on rat maternal behaviour and anxiety-related behaviour of male and female offspring. Physiol. Behav. 96, 693-702. (doi:10. 1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.001)
47. Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. D. 2002 Living in groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Wingfield, J. C., Lynn, S. E. & Soma, K. K. 2001 Avoiding the 'costs' of testosterone: ecological bases of hormone-behaviour interactions. Brain Behav. Evol. 57, 239-251. (doi:10.1159/000047243)
49. Kambo, J. S. & Galea, L. A. M. 2006 Activational levels of androgens influence risk assessment behaviour but do not influence stress-induced suppression in hippocampal cell proliferation in adult male rats. Behav. Brain Res. 175, 263-270. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.032)
50. Kavaliers, M., Choleris, E. & Colwell, D. D. 2001 Brief exposure to female odors 'emboldens' male mice by reducing predator-induced behavioural and hormonal responses. Horm. Behav. 40, 497-509. (doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1714)
51. Galef, B. G., Dudley, K. E. & Whiskin, E. E. 2008 Social learning of food preferences in 'dissatisfied' and 'uncertain' Norway rats. Anim. Behav. 75, 631-637. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2007.06.024)