Navigated targeting of liver lesions: Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 57, Issue SUPPL. 1 TRACK-C, 2012, Pages 897-900

  Franz, A M ^a   Servatius, M ^b   Seitel, A ^a   Radeleff, B ^b   Kauczor, H U ^b   Meinzer, H P ^a   Maier Hein, L ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC SHIELDING; ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT TRACKING; INSTRUMENTS; TRACKING (POSITION);

COMPUTER ASSISTED; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING; FERROMAGNETIC OBJECT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS; OPTICAL TRACKING; OPTICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS; PERCUTANEOUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATIONS; REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTS;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 84904003938     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2012-4337     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. World Health Organization (WHO): Global status re-port on noncommunicable diseases 2010.World Health Organization: Geneva, 2011
2. Wood, B. J. et al.: Navigation systems for ablation. Elsevier: Munich, Journal of vascular and interven-tional radiology JVIR, 2010, 21/8, pp. 257-263
3. Nagel, M. et al.: A Navigation System for Minimally Invasive CT-Guided Interventions. Springer: Berlin, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted in-tervention MICCAI, 2005, 3750, pp. 33-40 (Pubitemid 43828345)
4. Maier-Hein, L. et al.: In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiof-requency ablation of the liver. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Maryland, Medical Physics, 2008, 35/12, pp. 5385-5396
5. Mueller, S. A. et al.: Navigated Liver Biopsy Using a Novel Soft Tissue Navigation System versus CT-guided Liver Biopsy in a Porcine Model: A Prospec-tive Randomized Trial. Elsevier: Munich, Academic Radiology, 2012, 17/10, pp. 1282-1287
6. Banovac, F. et al.: Radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors in swine assisted by a navigation device with preprocedural volumetric planning. Elsevier: Munich, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, 2010, 21/1, pp. 122-109
7. Yaniv, Z. et al.: Needle-based interventions with the image-guided surgery toolkit (IGSTK): from phan-toms to clinical trials. Institute of Electrical and Elec-tronics Engineers IEEE: New York, IEEE Transac-tions on Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 57/4, pp. 922-933
8. Maier-Hein, L. et al.: Standardized Assessment of New Electromagnetic Field Generators in an Interven-tional Radiology Setting. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Maryland, Medical Physics, 2012, 39/6, pp. 3424 (11 pages)
9. Yaniv, Z. et al.: Electromagnetic tracking in the clini-cal environment. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Maryland, Medical Physics, 2009, 36/3, pp. 876-892
10. Maier-Hein, L. et al.: Soft tissue navigation using needle-shaped markers: Evaluation of navigation aid tracking accuracy and CT registration. International society for optics and photonics SPIE: Bellingham, Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2007: Visuali-zation, Image-Guided Procedures and Display, 2007, 6590, pp. 659016 (12 pages)
11. Neuhaus, J. et al.: Building image guided therapy ap-plications with the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit. Springer: Berlin, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2009, 4/Suppl 1, pp. 270-271
12. Kindratenko, V. V.: A Survey of Electromagnetic Position Tracker Calibration Techniques. Springer: Berlin, Virtual Reality, 2000, 5/3, pp. 169-182
13. Nakamoto M. et al.: Intraoperative magnetic tracker calibration using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker for 3-D ultrasound-based navigation in laparoscopic sur-gery. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE: New York, IEEE Transactions on Medical Im-aging, 27/2, pp. 255-270