The effects of information privacy concerns on digitizing personal health records

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1541-1554

  Li, Ting ^a   Slee, Thomas ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SERVICE INDUSTRY;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS; HEALTHCARE SECTORS; INFORMATION PRIVACY; INFORMATION PRIVACY CONCERNS; ON-LINE EXPERIMENTS; PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATIONS; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; STANDALONE SYSTEMS;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84903999225     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23068     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A.K. (2010). The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21 (4), 796-809.
2. Anderson, J.G. (2000). Security of the distributed electronic patient record: A case-based approach to identifying policy issues. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60 (2), 111-118.
3. Anderson, C.L., & Agarwal, R. (2011). The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Information Systems Research, 22 (3), 469-490.
4. Angst, C.M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33 (2), 339-370.
5. Awad, F.N., & Krishnan, M.S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30 (1), 13-28.
6. Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Persuasion strategies for information technology usage: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30 (4), 805-825. (Pubitemid 46051905)
7. Brewin, B. (2009, February 27). File-sharing networks used to uncover thousands of medical records. Nextgov. Retrieved from http://www.nextgov.com/ nextgov/ng-20090227-9147.php?oref=search
8. Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 8 (2), 295-336.
9. Coy, K.L. (2001). The current privacy environment: Implications for thirdparty research. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21 (4), 203-214.
10. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
11. Culnan, M.J., & Armstrong, P.K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10 (1), 104-115.
12. Daily Record. (2009, March 1). Medical records of Gordon Brown and Alex Salmond hacked. Retrieved from http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/ medical-records-of-gordon-brown-and-alex-1011941/
13. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-339.
14. Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2005). Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10 (2), 7-29. (Pubitemid 43554387)
15. Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17 (1), 61-80. (Pubitemid 43450179)
16. Fichman, R.G., Kohli, K., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Editorial overview-The role of information systems in healthcare: Current research and future trends. Information Systems Research, 22 (3), 419-428.
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (2), 39-50.
18. Hann, I.H., Hui, K.L., Lee, T., & Png I. (2007). Overcoming information privacy concerns: An information processing theory approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24 (2), 13-42.
19. Haux, R. (2006). Health information systems-Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75 (3-4), 268-281.
20. Häyrinen K., Saranto K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records:Areview of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77, 291-304.
21. Henseler, J., & Fassot, G. (2009). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In: V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 713-735). Amsterdam: Springer Publishing.
22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares modeling in international marketing. In R.R. Sinkovics & P.N. Ghauri (Eds.) Advances in international marketing, Volume 20: New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-320). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
23. Malhotra, N., Kim, S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15 (4), 336-355. (Pubitemid 40192456)
24. Mason, R.O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10 (1), 5-12.
25. Nederlands Dagblad. (2009, March 26). Meer bezwaren EPD dan werd verwacht. [More objections to the Electronic Patient File than expected.] Retrieved from http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/maart/26/meer-bezwaren-epd-dan- werd-verwacht
26. Noffsinger, R., & Chin, S. (2000). Improving the delivery of care and reducing health care costs with the digitization of information. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 14 (2), 23-30.
27. NRC. (2008). Klink rijdt gevaarlijke schaats met elektronisch patiënten dossier. [Klink is getting himself in a pickle with Electronic Patient File.] Retrieved from http://www.nrc.nl/opinie/article2057724.ece/Klink- rijdt-gevaarlijke-schaats-met-Elektronisch-Patienten-Dossier
28. O'Brien, D.G., & Yasnoff, W.A. (1999). Privacy, confidentiality, and security in information systems of state health agencies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16 (4), 351-358. (Pubitemid 29249385)
29. Pavlou, P.A. (2011). State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go. MIS Quarterly, 35 (4), 977-988.
30. Proctor, R.W., Schultz, E.E., & Vu, K.L. (2009). Human factors in information security and privacy. In J.N.D. Gupta & S. Sharma (Eds.), Handbook of research on information security and assurance (pp. 402-414). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
31. Raghupathi, W., & Tan, J. (2008). Charting a strategic path for health information technology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 23 (28), 500-523.
32. Safran, C., & Goldberg, H. (2000). Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60 (2), 77-83. (Pubitemid 32036967)
33. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: Ameta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (3), 325-343.
34. Smith, H.J., Milberg, S.J., & Burke, S.J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20 (2), 167-96.
35. Son, J.L., & Kim, S.S. (2008). Internet users' information privacyprotective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quarterly, 32 (3), 503-529.
36. Spil, T.A.M., Katsma, C.P., & Stegwee, R.A. (2007). Exploring interoperability of electronic health care records by studying demand and supply in the Netherlands. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20 (59), 995-1009.
37. Stewart, K.A., & Segars, A.H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concerns for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research, 13 (1), 36-49.
38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
39. Vishwanath, A., & Scamurra, S.D. (2007). Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: Using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics Journal, 13 (2), 119-134. (Pubitemid 46746096)
40. Woodward, B. (1995). The computer-based patient record and confidentiality. The New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 1419-1422.
41. Wu, J., & Lederer, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environmentbased voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33 (2), 419-432.