A dominance analysis of greenhouse gas emissions, beef output and land use of German dairy farms

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 129, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-67

  Zehetmeier, M ^a,c   Hoffmann, H ^a   Sauer, J ^a   Hofmann, G ^c   Dorfner, G ^c   O'Brien, D ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b ANIMAL AND GRASSLAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Ireland)

^c Institute of Agricultural Economics The Bavarian State Research Institute for Agriculture   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beef output; GHG emissions; Land use; Milk yield; Replacement rate; Variable importance

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; DOMINANCE; FAT; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE CHANGE; MILK; PROTEIN; YIELD RESPONSE;

GERMANY;

BOS; FRIESIA;

EID: 84903820834     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Rinderzüchter (ADR), 2012. Rinderproduktion in Deutschland 2011. ADR e.V., Bonn, DE.
2. Azen R., Budescu D.V. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychol. Methods 2003, 8(2):129-148.
3. Berlin D., Uhlin H.-E. Opportunity cost principles for life cycle assessment: towards strategic decision making in agriculture. Progr. Ind. Ecol. 2004, 1(1):187-202.
4. British Standards Institution (BSI), 2008. Guide to PAS 2050. How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of Goods and Services. BSI, London, UK.
5. Budescu D.V. Dominance analysis - a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple-regression. Psychol. Bull. 1993, 114(3):542-551.
6. Capper J.L., Cady R.A., Bauman D.E. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87:2160-2167.
7. Capper J.L., Cady R.A. A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey compared with Holstein milk for cheese production. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95(1):165-176.
8. Casey J.W., Holden N.M. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agric. Syst. 2005, 86(1):97-114.
9. Cederberg, C., Flysjö, A., 2004. Life cycle inventory of 23 Dairy farms in South Western Sweden. SIK Report No. 728, SIK, Göteborg, Sweden.
10. Christensen R. Comment on Chevan and Sutherland. Am. Stat. 1992, 45:90-96.
11. Christie K.M., Gourley C.J.P., Rawnsley R.P., Eckard R.J., Awty I.M. Whole-farm systems analysis of Australian dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2012, 52(11):998-1011.
12. Cooper M.H., Boston J., Bright J. Policy challenges for livestock emissions abatement: lessons from New Zealand. Clim. Policy 2013, 13(1):110-133.
13. Crawley M.J. The R book 2013, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. second ed.
14. Crosson P., Shalloo L., O'Brien D., Lanigan G.J., Foley P.A., Boland T.M., Kenny D.A. A review of whole farm systems models of greenhouse gas emissions from beef and dairy cattle production systems. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-67(SI):29-45.
15. Deutsche Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft (DLG), 1997. DLG - Futterwerttabellen Wiederkäuer, seventh ed., DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, DE.
16. Deutsche Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft DLG, 2005. Bilanzierung der Nährstoffausscheidungen landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere. Arbeiten der DLG Band 199. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, DE.
17. Deutsche Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft (DLG), 2011. Die neue Betriebszweigabrechnung. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Arbeiten der DLG - Band 197, third ed., DLG, Frankfurt am Main, DE.
18. Don A., Scholten T., Schulze E.D. Conversion of cropland into grassland: implications for soil organic-carbon stocks in two soils with different texture. J. Plant Nutr. Soil 2009, 172(1):53-62.
19. Dorfner G. Erfolg im schwierigen Jahr. DLG-Mitteilungen 2013, 4778(4):92-97.
20. Dorfner G., Hofmann G. Milchreport Bayern 2011 - Ergebnisse der Betriebszweigabrechnung Milchproduktion 2010/11 2012, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, München, DE.
21. Dougherty C. Introduction to Econometrics 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA. fourth ed.
22. Ecoinvent, 2010. Ecoinvent Centre. Ecoinvent 2.0 database. Swiss centre for life cycle inventories, Dübendorf, (accessed November 30, 2012). http://www.ecoinvent.ch.
23. European Commission, 2011. EU Dairy Farms Report 2011 Based on FADN Data. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
24. European Simmental Federation (ESF), 2013. Questionnaire 2012. Unpublished data.
25. Flysjö A., Cederberg C., Henriksson M., Ledgard S. How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2011, 16(5):420-430.
26. Flysjö A., Cederberg C., Henriksson M., Ledgard S. The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change - critical consideration in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. J. Cleaner Prod. 2012, 28:134-142.
27. Flysjö A., Henriksson M., Cederberg C., Ledgard S., Englund J.-E. The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104(6):459-469.
28. Franks J.R., Hadingham B. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: avoiding trivial solutions to a global problem. Land Policy 2012, 29(4):727-736.
29. Gerber P., Vellinga T., Opio C., Steinfeld H. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livest. Sci. 2011, 139(1-2):100-108.
30. Gerber, P., Vellinga, T., Opio, C., Henderson, B., Steinfeld, H., 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector. A life cycle assessment. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Animal Production and Health Division. Rome, Italy.
31. Geuder U., Pickl M., Scheidler M., Schuster M., Goetz K.-U. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of Bavarian cattle breeds. Züchtungskunde 2012, 84(6):485-499.
32. Groemping U. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J. Stat. Softw. 2006, 17(1):1-27.
33. Haas G., Wetterich F., Kopke U. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 83(1-2):43-53.
34. Haenel, H., 2010. Calculations of Emissions from German Agriculture - National Emission Inventory Report (NIR) 2010 for 2008, Sonderheft 334. vTI Braunschweig, DE.
35. Haiger A., Knaus W. A comparison of dual-purpose Simmental and Holstein Friesian dairy cows in milk and meat production: 2(nd) comn. Fattening and slaughter performance using domestic protein feedstuffs. Züchtungskunde 2010, 82(6):447-454.
36. Heijungs R. Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. J. Cleaner Prod. 1996, 4(3-4):159-166.
37. Henriksson M., Flysjö A., Cederberg C., Swensson C. Variation in carbon footprint of milk due to management differences between Swedish dairy farms. Animal 2011, 5(9):1474-1484.
38. Hofmann, G., 2013. Personal communication, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft.
39. Hörtenhuber S., Lindenthal T., Amon B., Markut T., Kirner L., Zollitsch W. Greenhouse gas emissions from selected Austrian dairy production systems-model calculations considering the effects of land use change. Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 2010, 25(4):316-329.
40. IDF, 2010. A common carbon footprint approach for dairy, 445. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation. 40 pp, ISSN 0250-5118.
41. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (Eds.), Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Hayama, Japan. Chapters 10 and 11 (10.1-10.87; 11.1-11.54).
42. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 20-91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
43. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E). ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
44. Kirchgeßner M., Windisch W., Müller H. Nutritional factors for the quantification of methane production. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology 1995, 333-351. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, DE. W. van Engelhardt, S. Leonhard-Marek, G. Breves, D. Giesecke (Eds.).
45. Kleiber C., Zeileis C. Applied Econometrics with R 2008, Springer Science+Business Media.
46. Kraatz, S., 2009. Ermittlung der Energieeffizienz in der Tierhaltung am Beispiel der Milchviehhaltung. PhD, Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin, DE.
47. Kristensen T., Morgensen L., Knudsen M.T., Hermansen J.E. Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livest. Sci. 2011, 140(1-3):136-148.
48. Kuestermann B., Kainz M., Huelsbergen K.-J. Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2008, 23(1):38-52.
49. Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (KTBL) Betriebsplanung Landwirtschaft 2008/09 2008, KTBL, Darmstadt, DE. 21st ed.
50. Landeskuratorium der Erzeugerringe für tierische Veredelung in Bayern e.V. (LKV), 2012. Auswertung der Schlachtleistung beim Rind, (accessed March 12, 2013). http://www.lkv.bayern.de/media/mlp_12_sl.pdf.
51. LeBreton J.M., Ployhart R.E., Ladd R.T. A Monte Carlo comparison of relative importance methodologies. Organ. Res. Methods 2004, 7(3):258-282.
52. Lee, H.-C., McCarl, B.A., Schneider, U.A., Chen, C.-C., 2004. Leakage and comparative advantage implications of agricultural participation in greenhouse gas emission mitigation, Research Report, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, No. 2004-1.
53. Lesschen J.P., van den Berg M., Westhoek H.J., Witzke H.P., Oenema O. Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-67(SI):16-28.
54. Lucy M.C. ADSA foundation scholar award - reproductive loss in high producing dairy cattle: where will it end?. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84(6):1277-1293.
55. Makinson K.A., Hamby D.M., Edwards J.A. A review of contemporary methods for the presentation of scientific uncertainty. Healthy Phys. 2012, 103(6):714-731.
56. McCarthy S., Horan B., Dillon P., O'Connor P., Rath M., Shalloo L. Economic comparison of divergent strains of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows in various pasture-based production systems. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:1493-1505.
57. Meul M., Passel S., Fremaut D., Haesaert G. Higher sustainability performance of intensive grazing versus zero-grazing dairy systems. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32:629-638.
58. Nguyen T.L.T., Hermansen J.E., Mogensen L. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18:756-766.
59. Nguyen T.T.H., Doreau M., Corson M.S., Eugene M., Delaby L., Chesneau G., Gallard Y., van der Werf H.M.G. Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 120:127-137.
60. O'Brien D., Shalloo L., Patton J., Buckley F., Grainger C., Wallace M. A life cycle assessment of seasonal grass-based and confinement dairy farms. Agric. Syst. 2012, 107:33-46.
61. O'Brien D., Shalloo L., Grainger C., Buckley F., Horan B., Wallace M. The influence of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93(7):3390-3402.
62. Pannell D.J. Flat earth economics: the far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions in economic decision making. Rev. Agric. Econom. 2006, 28(4):553-566.
63. Popp, J., Thoma, G., Ulrich, R., Matlock, M., Kellogg, W., Clayton-Niederman, Z., Kemper, N., Pilgrim, R., Shonnard, D., Adom, F., 2010. Factors influencing the Green House Gas Footprint of US Dairy Farms. Poster Prepared for Presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association 2010. Denver, USA.
64. Powlson D.S., Whitmore A.P., Goulding K.W.T. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 62(1):42-55.
65. R Development Core Team, 2006. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
66. Rehak D., Volek J., Barton L., Vodkova Z., Kubesova M., Rajmon R. Relationships among milk yield, body weight, and reproduction in Holstein and Czech Fleckvieh cows. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 57(6):274-282.
67. Reijs, J.W., Daatselaar, C.H.G., Helming, J.F.M., Jager, J., Beldman, A.C.G., 2013. Grazing Dairy Cows in North-West Europe. LEI Report 2013-001. LEI Wageningen UR, The Hague, Netherlands.
68. Reynolds C.K., Crompton L.A., Mills J.A.N. Improving the efficiency of energy utilisation in cattle. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2011, 51(1):6-12.
69. Roemer A. Investigations on longevity in German Holstein cows. Züchtungskunde 2011, 83(1):8-20.
70. Rotz C.A., Soder K.J., Skinner R.H., Dell C.J., Kleinman P.J., Schmidt J.P., Bryant R.B. Grazing can reduce the environmental impact of dairy production systems. Forage Grazing Lands 2009, 10.1094/FG-2009-0916-01-RS.
71. Schmidt, J.H., Dalgaard, R., 2012. National and farm level carbon footprint of milk. Methodology and Results for Danish and Swedish milk 2005 at Farm Gate. Arla Foods, Aarhus, Denmark.
72. Smith P., Haberl H., Popp A., Erb K.-H., Lauk C., Harper R., Tubiello F.N., de Siqueira Pinto A., Jafari M., Sohi S., Masera O., Böttcher H., Berndes G., Bustamante M., Ahammad H., Clark H., Dong H., Elsiddig E.A., Mbow C., Ravindranath N.H., Rice C.W., Robledo Abad C., Romanovskaya A., Sperling F., Herrero M., House J.I., Rose S. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?. Glob. Change Biol. 2013, 19(8):2285-2302.
73. Soussana J.F., Tallec T., Blanfort V. Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. Animal 2010, 4(3):334-350.
74. Thomassen M.A., van Calker K.J., Smits M.C.J., Iepema G.L., de Boer I.J.M. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric. Syst. 2008, 96(1-3):95-107.
75. Umweltbundesamt (UBA), 2010. Entwicklung der spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix 1990-2008, (accessed January 21, 2010). http://%20www.umweltbundesamt.de/energie/archiv/co2-strommix.pdf.
76. van der Werf H.M.G., Kanyarushoki C., Corson M.S. An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(11):3643-3652.
77. van Middelaar C.E., Cederberg C., Vellinga T.V., van der Werf H.M.G., de Boer I.J.M. Exploring variability in methods and data sensitivity in carbon footprints of feed ingredients. Int. J. Life Cylce Assess. 2013, 18(4):768-782.
78. Vellinga, T.V., Blonk, H., Marinussen, M., van Zeist, W.J., de Boer, I.J.M., 2012. Methodology used in feedprint: a tool quantifying greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Livestock Research, Wageningen UR. ISSN 1570-8616, (accessed June 3, 2012). http://www.webapplicaties.wur.nl/software/feedprint/.
79. Vellinga T.V., Hoving I.E. Maize silage for dairy cows: mitigation of methane emissions can be offset by land use change. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2011, 89:413-426.
80. Verrecchia R.E. Information acquisition in a noisy rational expectations economy. Econometrica 1982, 50:1415-1430.
81. Webb J., Williams A.G., Hope E., Evans D. Do foods imported into the UK have a greater environmental impact than the same foods produced within the UK?. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 10.1007/s11367-013-0576-2.
82. World Holstein Friesian Federation (WHFF), 2011. Annual Statistics 2011, (accessed May 15, 2012). http://www.whff.info/info/documents/2011AnnualStatisticsReport-World_020.pdf.
83. Zehetmeier M., Baudracco J., Hoffmann H., Heißenhuber A. Does increasing milk yield reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach. Animal 2012, 6(1):154-166.
84. Zimmermann A., Heckelei T. Structural change of European dairy farms - a cross-regional analysis. J. Agric. Econ. 2012, 63(3):576-603.