Automated analysis of routinely generated preclinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Lindhardt, Emma ^a   Gennemark, Peter ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Automated PK PD analysis; Human dose prediction; Mathematical modeling

Indexed keywords

DRUG RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG SCREENING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; RECEPTORS, DRUG; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84903786808     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: 17576334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720014500103     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lalonde RL, Kowalski KG, Hutmacher MM, Ewy W, Nichols DJ et al. Model-based drug development, Clin Pharmacol Ther 82 (1):21-32, 2007. (Pubitemid 46950619
2. Visser SA, Aurell M, Jones RD, Schuck VJ, Egnell AC, Peters SA, Brynne L, Yates JW, Jansson-L of mark R, Tan B, Cooke M, Barry ST, Hughes A, Bredberg U, Model-based drug discovery: Implementation and impact, Drug Discov Today 18 (15-16):764-775, 2013.
3. Gabrielsson J, Weiner D, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic, Data analysis, Concepts and Applications, 4th Edition, 2nd print, Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, Stockholm, 2010, ISBN 139789197651004.
4. Schaefer P, Automated reporting of pharmacokinetic study results: Gaining e±ciency downstream from the laboratory, Bioanalysis 3 (13):1471-1478, 2011.
5. Logg A, Automation of Computational Mathematical Modeling, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, 2004, ISBN: 91-7291-436-X.
6. Gennemark P, Wedelin D, Benchmarks for identīcation of ordinary di®erential equations from time series data, Bioinformatics 25 (6):780-786, 2009.
7. Borger S, Liebermeister W, Uhlendorf J, Klipp E, Automatically generated model of a metabolic network, Int Conf Genome Inform 18:215-224, 2007.
8. Dräger A, Adrian Schroder A, Zell A, Automating mathematical modeling of biochemical reaction networks, Systems biology for signaling networks, Editor: Choi S, ISBN: 978-1- 4419-5796-2, Systems Biology 1:159-205, 2010.
9. Castillo O, Melin P, Automated mathematical modelling, simulation and behavior identīcation of robotic dynamic systems using a new fuzzy-fractal-genetic approach, Robotics Autonomous Syst 28 (1):19-30 (12), 1999.
10. Castillo O, Melin P, An intelligent system for automated mathematical modelling and simulation of dynamical engineering systems, Proc AIENG'96, pp. 9-10, 1996.
11. Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 8.0, Champaign, IL (2010).
12. MATLAB 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
13. Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR, The New S Language: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacīc Grove, CA, USA, 1988, ISBN 0-534-09192-X.
14. Chambers JM, Hastie TJ, Statistical Models in S, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacīc Grove, CA, USA, 1991, ISBN 0-412-05291-1. TIBCO Software Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA.
15. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org, Accessed on November 27, 2013.
16. Wright DB, London K, Modern Regression Techniques Using R: A Practical Guide, SAGE, London, UK, 2009.
17. SAS 9.3, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
18. Lixoft, Orsay, France.
19. Lavielle M, Mentre F, Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software, J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34 (2):229-249, 2007. (Pubitemid 46536259
20. Chan PL, Jacqmin P, Lavielle M, McFadyen L, Weatherley B, The use of the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX software for estimation of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic- viral dynamics parameters of maraviroc in asymptomatic HIV subjects, J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 38 (1):41-61, 2011. Certara, St. Louis MO, USA.
21. Yan X, Chen Y, Krzyzanski W, Methods of solving rapid binding target-mediated drug disposition model for two drugs competing for the same receptor, J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 39 (5):543-560, 2012.
22. Mol M, Patole MS, Singh S, Immune signal transduction in leishmaniasis from natural to artīcial systems: Role of feedback loop insertion, Biochim Biophys Acta 1840 (1):71-79, 2013.
23. Maiwald T, Timmer J, Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment ̄tting with potters- Wheel, Bioinformatics 24 (18):2037-2043, 2008.
24. Gennemark P, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/̄leexchange/ 43521-preclinical-pkpd-modeling, Accessed on November 27, 2013.
25. Hosea NA, Collard WT, Cole S, Maurer TS, Fang RX, Jones H, Kakar SM, Nakai Y, Smith BJ, Webster R, Beaumont K, Prediction of human pharmacokinetics from preclinical information: Comparative accuracy of quantitative prediction approaches, J Clin Pharmacol 49 (5):513-533, 2009.
26. Gennemark P, Jansson-Lofmark R, Hyberg G, Wigstrand M, Kakol-Palm D, Håkansson P, Hovdal D, Brodin P, Fritsch-Fredin M, Antonsson M, Ploj K, Gabrielsson J, A modeling approach for compounds a®ecting body composition, J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 40 (6):651-667, 2013.