A mechanistic link between gene regulation and genome architecture in mammalian development

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 27, Issue , 2014, Pages 92-101

  Bonora, Giancarlo ^a   Plath, Kathrin ^a   Denholtz, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; GENOMIC DNA; CHROMATIN;

CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MATURATION; CELL SEPARATION; CHROMATIN; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ENHANCER REGION; EXON; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; REVIEW; TOPOLOGICALLY ASSOCATING DOMAIN; ANIMAL; CELL NUCLEUS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; EXONS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME; HUMANS;

EID: 84903785480     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2014.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Dekker J., Rippe K., Dekker M., Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 2002, 295:1306-1311. 10.1126/science.1067799.
2. Dekker J., Marti-Renom M.A., Mirny L.A. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet 2013, 14:390-403. 10.1038/nrg3454.
3. de Wit E., de Laat W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev 2012, 26:11-24. 10.1101/gad.179804.111.
4. Gibcus J.H., Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell 2013, 49:773-782. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011.
5. Bickmore W.A., van Steensel B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 2013, 152:1270-1284. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001.
6. Smallwood A., Ren B. Genome organization and long-range regulation of gene expression by enhancers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013, 25:387-394. 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.005.
7. Denholtz M., Plath K. Pluripotency in 3D: genome organization in pluripotent cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:793-801. 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.11.001.
8. Cheutin T., Cavalli G. Polycomb silencing: from linear chromatin domains to 3D chromosome folding. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014, 25C:30-37. 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.016.
9. Lieberman-Aiden E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293. 10.1126/science.1181369.
10. Hiratani I., et al. Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis. Genome Res 2010, 20:155-169. 10.1101/gr.099796.109.
11. Lin Y.C., et al. Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nat Immunol 2012, 13:1196-1204. 10.1038/ni.2432.
12. Clowney E.J., et al. Nuclear aggregation of olfactory receptor genes governs their monogenic expression. Cell 2012, 151:724-737. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.043.
13. Denholtz M., et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:602-616. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.08.013.
14. Apostolou E., et al. Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12:699-712. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013.
15. de Wit E., et al. The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors. Nature 2013, 501:227-231. 10.1038/nature12420.
16. Papantonis A., et al. TNFalpha signals through specialized factories where responsive coding and miRNA genes are transcribed. EMBO J 2012, 31:4404-4414. 10.1038/emboj.2012.288.
17. Dixon J.R., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380. 10.1038/nature11082.
18. Nora E.P., et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012, 485:381-385. 10.1038/nature11049.
19. Sexton T., et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 2012, 148:458-472. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010.
20. Shen Y., et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 2012, 488:116-120. 10.1038/nature11243.
21. Phillips-Cremins J.E., et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 2013, 153:1281-1295. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053.
22. Wei Z., et al. Klf4 organizes long-range chromosomal interactions with the oct4 locus in reprogramming and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:36-47. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.010.
23. Sofueva S., et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J 2013, 32:3119-3129. 10.1038/emboj.2013.237.
24. Zuin J., et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 10.1073/pnas.1317788111.
25. Cremer T., Cremer C. Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part I. The rise of chromosome territories. Eur J Histochem 2006, 50:161-176.
26. Cremer T., Cremer C. Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part II. Fall and resurrection of chromosome territories during the 1950s to 1980s. Part III. Chromosome territories and the functional nuclear architecture: experiments and models from the 1990s to the present. Eur J Histochem 2006, 50:223-272.
27. Cremer T., Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2:a003889. 10.1101/cshperspect.a003889.
28. Le T.B., Imakaev M.V., Mirny L.A., Laub M.T. High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science 2013, 342:731-734. 10.1126/science.1242059.
29. Kosak S.T., et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 2002, 296:158-162. 10.1126/science.1068768.
30. Peric-Hupkes D., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010, 38:603-613. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016.
31. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.
32. Takebayashi S., et al. Murine esBAF chromatin remodeling complex subunits BAF250a and Brg1 are necessary to maintain and reprogram pluripotency-specific replication timing of select replication domains. Epigenetics Chromatin 2013, 6:42. 10.1186/1756-8935-6-42.
33. Bantignies F., et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 2011, 144:214-226. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026.
34. Zhang H., et al. Intrachromosomal looping is required for activation of endogenous pluripotency genes during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:30-35. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.012.
35. Fanucchi S., Shibayama Y., Burd S., Weinberg M.S., Mhlanga M.M. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell 2013, 155:606-620. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.051.
36. Schoenfelder S., et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010, 42:53-61.
37. Rinn J.L., et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 2007, 129:1311-1323. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022.
38. Engreitz J.M., et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science 2013, 341:1237973. 10.1126/science.1237973.
39. Sanyal A., Lajoie B.R., Jain G., Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 2012, 489:109-113. 10.1038/nature11279.
40. Andrey G., et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 2013, 340:1234167. 10.1126/science.1234167.
41. Li W., et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 2013, 498:516-520. 10.1038/nature12210.
42. Kieffer-Kwon K.R., et al. Interactome maps of mouse gene regulatory domains reveal basic principles of transcriptional regulation. Cell 2013, 155:1507-1520. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.039.
43. Mercer T.R., et al. DNase I-hypersensitive exons colocalize with promoters and distal regulatory elements. Nat Genet 2013, 45:852-859. 10.1038/ng.2677.
44. Jin F., et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 2013, 503:290-294. 10.1038/nature12644.
45. Liu W., et al. Brd4 and JMJD6-associated anti-pause enhancers in regulation of transcriptional pause release. Cell 2013, 155:1581-1595. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.056.
46. Dorsett D., Merkenschlager M. Cohesin at active genes: a unifying theme for cohesin and gene expression from model organisms to humans. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013, 25:327-333. 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.003.
47. Kagey M.H., et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 2010, 467:430-435. 10.1038/nature09380.
48. Parelho V., et al. Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell 2008, 132:422-433. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.011.
49. Hadjur S., et al. Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus. Nature 2009, 460:410-413. 10.1038/nature08079.
50. Rubio E.D., et al. CTCF physically links cohesin to chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:8309-8314. 10.1073/pnas.0801273105.
51. Wendt K.S., et al. Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 2008, 451:796-801. 10.1038/nature06634.
52. Handoko L., et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 2011, 43:630-638. 10.1038/ng.857.
53. Negre N., et al. A comprehensive map of insulator elements for the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000814. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000814.
54. Schwartz Y.B., et al. Nature and function of insulator protein binding sites in the Drosophila genome. Genome Res 2012, 22:2188-2198. 10.1101/gr.138156.112.
55. Zuin J., et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014, 111:996-1001. 10.1073/pnas.1317788111.
56. Nagano T., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 2013, 502:59-64. 10.1038/nature12593.
57. Simonis M., et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 2006, 38:1348-1354. 10.1038/ng1896.
58. Zhao Z., et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 2006, 38:1341-1347. 10.1038/ng1891.
59. Splinter E., et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev 2011, 25:1371-1383. 10.1101/gad.633311.
60. Dostie J., et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 2006, 16:1299-1309. 10.1101/gr.5571506.
61. van Berkum N.L., et al. Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J Vis Exp 2010, 10.3791/1869.
62. Kalhor R., Tjong H., Jayathilaka N., Alber F., Chen L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:90-98. 10.1038/nbt.2057.
63. Fullwood M.J., et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 2009, 462:58-64. 10.1038/nature08497.