Probabilistic PCA of censored data: Accounting for uncertainties in the visualization of high-throughput single-cell qPCR data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 1867-1875

  Buettner, Florian ^a   Moignard, Victoria ^b   Göttgens, Berthold ^b   Theis, Fabian J ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SECRETION (PROCESS); STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; MICE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SOFTWARE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84903721731     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu134     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amirel AD. et al. (2013) viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 545-552
2. Anders, S. and Huber, W. (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol., 11, R106
3. Ballenberger, N. et al. (2012) Novel statistical approaches for non-normal censored immunological data: Analysis of cytokine and gene expression Data. PLoS One, 7, e46423
4. Bishop, C.M. (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer, New York
5. Brennecke, P. et al. (2013) Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods, 10, 1093-1095
6. Buettner, F. and Theis, F.J. (2012) A novel approach for resolving differences in single-cell gene expression patterns from zygote to blastocyst. Bioinformatics, 28, i626-i632
7. Dalerba, P. et al. (2011) Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors. Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 1120-1127
8. Dominguez, M.H. et al. (2013) Highly multiplexed quantitation of gene expression on single cells. J. Immunol. Methods, 391, 133-145
9. Fluidigm Corporation. (2012) Application guidance: Single-cell data analysis. Grochow, K. et al. (2004) Style-based inverse kinematics. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). Vol. 23, ACM, pp. 522-531
10. Guo, G. et al. (2010) Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell, 18, 675-685
11. Lawrence, N. (2005) Probabilistic non-linear principal component analysis with gaussian process latent variable models. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 6, 1783-1816
12. Lawrence, N. et al. (2005) Extensions of the informative vector machine. In: Winkler, J. et al. (ed.) Deterministic and Statistical Methods in Machine Learning, Volume 3635 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 56-87
13. Lawrence, N.D. (2004) Gaussian process latent variable models for visualisation of high dimensional data. In: NIPS. p. 2004
14. Lawrence, N.D. (2006) Local distance preservation in the gp-lvm through back constraints. In: ICML. ACM Press, pp. 513-520
15. Lubin, J.H. et al. (2004) Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ. Health Perspect., 112, 1691-1696
16. McDavid, A. et al. (2013) Data exploration, quality control and testing in single-cell qPCR-based gene expression experiments. Bioinformatics, 29, 461-467
17. Minka, T. (2001) Expectation propagation for approximate bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-01). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 362-369
18. Moignard, V. et al. (2013) Characterization of transcriptional networks in blood stem and progenitor cells using high-Throughput single-cell gene expression analysis. Nat. Cell Biol., 15, 363-372
19. Nabney, I.T. (2001) Netlab: Algorithms for pattern recognition. In: Advances in Pattern Recognition. Springer, Berlin
20. Orkin, S.H. and Zon, L.I. (2008) Hematopoiesis: An evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell, 132, 631-644
21. Pina, C. et al. (2012) Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis. Nat. Cell Biol., 14, 287-294
22. Rasmussen, C. and Williams, C. (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. In: Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. MIT Press
23. Taniguchi, K. et al. (2009) Quantitative analysis of gene expression in a single cell by qPCR. Nat. Methods., 6, 503-506
24. Theis, F.J. et al. (2011) Complex principal component and correlation structure of 16 yeast genomic variables. Mol. Biol. Evol., 28, 2501-2512
25. Uh, H-W. et al. (2008) Evaluation of regression methods when immunological measurements are constrained by detection limits. BMC Immunol., 9, 59
26. van Der Maaten, L. and Hinton, G. (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2579-2605
27. Yan, L. et al. (2013) Single-cell rna-seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 20, 1131-1139.