A novel approach for resolving differences in single-cell gene expression patterns from zygote to blastocyst

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2012, Pages

  Buettner, Florian ^a   Theis, Fabian J ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; MICE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; ZYGOTE;

EID: 84866463531     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts385     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bishop,C.M. (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer, New York.
2. Coucouvanis,E. and Martin,G.R. (1999) Bmp signaling plays a role in visceral endoderm differentiation and cavitation in the early mouse embryo. Development, 126, 535-546.
3. Cross,J.C. et al. (1995) Hxt encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that regulates trophoblast cell development. Development, 121, 2513-2523.
4. Fujikura,J. et al. (2002) Differentiation of embryonic stem cells is induced by gata factors. Genes Dev., 16, 784-789.
5. Guo,G. et al. (2010) Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell, 18, 675-685.
6. Hinton,G.E. and Salakhutdinov,R.R. (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504-507.
7. Johnson,M.H. and McConnell,J.M.L. (2004) Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 15, 583-597.
8. Lawrence,N. (2007) Learning for larger datasets with the gaussian process latent variable model. In AISTATS, pp. 21-24.
9. Lawrence,N.D. (2004) Gaussian process latent variable models for visualisation of high dimensional data. In NIPS, 2004.
10. Lawrence,N.D. (2006) Local distance preservation in the gp-lvm through back constraints. In ICML, ACM Press, New York, pp. 513-520.
11. Nabney,I.T. (2001) Netlab: Algorithms for pattern recognition. In Advances in Pattern Recognition. Springer, Berlin.
12. Rasmussen,C. and Williams,C. (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
13. Roweis,S.T. and Saul,L.K. (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290, 2323-2326.
14. Sammon,J.W. (1969) A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput., 18, 401-409.
15. Shieh,A.D. et al. (2011) Tree preserving embedding. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108, 16916-16921.
16. Strumpf,D. et al. (2005) Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development, 132, 2093-2102.
17. Taniguchi,K. et al. (2009) Quantitative analysis of gene expression in a single cell by qpcr. Nat. Methods, 6, 503-506.
18. Tenenbaum,J.B. et al. (2000) A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319-2323.
19. Urtasun,R. and Darrell,T. (2007) Discriminative Gaussian process latent variable model for classification. In ICML '07: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning, ACM, pp. 927-934, New York, NY, USA.
20. van der Maaten,L. and Hinton,G. (2008) Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2579-2605.
21. Wang,J.M. et al. (2006) Gaussian process dynamical models. In In NIPS, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1441-1448.