Uncertainty assessment of imaging techniques for the 3D reconstruction of stent geometry

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1062-1068

  Cosentino, Daria ^a,b   Zwierzak, Iwona ^c   Schievano, Silvia ^b   Díaz Zuccarini, Vanessa ^a   Fenner, John W ^c   Narracott, Andrew J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analysis; Computed tomography; Fluoroscopy; Imaging; Reconstruction; Stent

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT SCREENS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STENTS; STRUTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; FLUOROSCOPY; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RECONSTRUCTION METHOD; STENT; UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STENT; STENT GEOMETRY; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNCERTAINTY; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OPTICAL IMAGING; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNCERTAINTY; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84903713574     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McElhinney D.B., Cheatham J.P., Jones T.K., Lock J.E., Vincent J.A., Zahn E.M., et al. Stent fracture, valve dysfunction, and right ventricular outflow tract reintervention after transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation patient-related and procedural risk factors in the US Melody Valve Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4(6):602-614.
2. Nordmeyer J., Lurz P., Coats L., Walker F., Taylor A.M., Khambackone S., et al. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is a successful treatment option for RVOT conduit failure after ross procedure. Circulation 2007, 116(16):713.
3. Ormiston J.A., Webster M.W.I., Webber B., Stewart J.T., Ruygrok P.N., Hatrick R.I. The "crush" technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insights from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployments. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 1(4):351-357.
4. Poerner T.C., Ludwig B., Duda S.H., Diesing P., Kalmar G., Suselbeck T., et al. Determinants of stent expansion in curved stenotic lesions: an in vitro experimental study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004, 15(7):727-735.
5. Conti M., Van Loo D., Auricchio F., De Beule M., De Santis G., Verhegghe B., et al. Impact of carotid stent cell design on vessel scaffolding: a case study comparing experimental investigation and numerical simulations. J Endovasc Ther 2011, 18(3):397-406.
6. Leipsic J., Gurvitch R., LaBounty T.M., Min J.K., Wood D., Johnson M., et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4(4):416-429.
7. Lim H.B., Hur G., Kim S.Y., Kim Y.H., Kwon S.U., Lee W.R., et al. Coronary stent fracture: detection with 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients and in vitro. Radiology 2008, 249(3):810-819.
8. Mahnken A.H. CT imaging of coronary stents: past, present, and future. ISRN Cardiol 2012, 2012:139823.
9. Schievano S., Taylor A.M., Capelli C., Lurz P., Nordmeyer J., Migliavacca F., et al. Patient specific finite element analysis results in more accurate prediction of stent fractures: application to percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. J Biomech 2010, 43(4):687-693.
10. Ionescu M., Metcalfe R.W., Cody D., Alvarado M.V.Y., Hipp J., Benndorf G. Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT): C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent. Acad Radiol 2011, 18(7):866-875.
11. Connolley T., Nash D., Buffiere J.Y., Sharif F., McHugh P.E. X-ray micro-tomography of a coronary stent deployed in a model artery. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29(10):1132-1141.
12. Narracott A.J., Hose D.R., Lawford P.V., Gunn J. Measurement of the symmetry of in vitro stent expansion: a stereo-photogrammetric approach. J Med Eng Technol 2003, 27(2):59-70.
13. Russ C., Gessat M., Falk V., Szekely G. Rapid prototyping of silicone-based phantom models for stent simulation validation. MICCAI - stent'12, 1st MICCAI workshop on computer assisted stenting 2012.
14. Nordmeyer J., Gaudin R., Tann O.R., Lurz P.C., Bonhoeffer P., Taylor A.M., et al. MRI may be sufficient for noninvasive assessment of great vessel stents: an in vitro comparison of MRI, CT, and conventional angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(4):865-871.
15. Ewert P., Schubert S., Peters B., Abdul-Khaliq H., Nagdyman N., Lange P.E. The CP stent - short, long, covered - for the treatment of aortic coarctation, stenosis of pulmonary arteries and caval veins, and Fontan anastomosis in children and adults: an evaluation of 60 stents in 53 patients. Heart 2005, 91(7):948-953.
16. Cheatham J.P. Stenting of coarctation of the aorta. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001, 54(1):112-125.
17. House B., Nickels K. Increased automation in stereo camera calibration techniques. 3rd international conference on computing, communications and control technologies, vol. 2, proceedings 2005, 112-115.
18. Liu P., Willis A., Sui Y. Stereoscopic 3D reconstruction using motorized zoom lenses within an embedded system. Image processing: machine vision applications II, SPIE-IS&T/Vol. 7251 2009, 72510W-1.