MRI may be sufficient for noninvasive assessment of great vessel stents: An in vitro comparison of MRI, CT, and conventional angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 195, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 865-871

  Nordmeyer, Johannes ^a,b,c   Gaudin, Régis ^d   Tann, Oliver R ^a   Lurz, Phillip C ^a,b,e   Bonhoeffer, Phillip ^a,b   Taylor, Andrew M ^a,b   Muthurangu, Vivek ^a,b  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c DEUTSCHES HERZZENTRUM BERLIN   (Germany)

^d L INSTITUT DU THORAX   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conventional angiography; Dual source CT; Great vessel stent imaging; MRI; Surveillance of stent patency

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL; IRIDIUM; NITINOL; PLATINUM; STAINLESS STEEL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GREAT BLOOD VESSEL; IN VITRO STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEADY STATE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMALS; AORTA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77958601125     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4166     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baerlocher L, Kretschmar O, Harpes P, Arbenz U, Berger F, Knirsch W. Stent implantation and balloon angioplasty for treatment of branch pulmonary artery stenosis in children. Clin Res Cardiol 2008; 97:310-317
2. Forbes TJ, Garekar S, Amin Z, et al. Procedural results and acute complications in stenting native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients over 4 years of age: a multi-institutional study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70:276-285
3. EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:2187-2192
4. Rosales AM, Lock JE, Perry SB, Geggel RL. Interventional catheterization management of perioperative peripheral pulmonary stenosis: balloon angioplasty or endovascular stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 56:272-277
5. Lurz P, Coats L, Khambadkone S, et al. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: impact of evolving technology and learning curve on clinical outcome. Circulation 2008; 117:1964-1972
6. Piazza N, Grube E, Gerckens U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention 2008; 4:242-249
7. Zajarias A, Cribier AG. Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:1829-1836
8. Eichhorn JG, Long FR, Hill SL, Cheatham JP. Multislice computed tomography as an adjunct to the management of an in-stent stenosis in an infant with congenital heart disease: imaging for the future. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67:477-481
9. Ueda T, Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Dake MD, Sze DY. Imaging of the thoracic aorta before and after stent-graft repair of aneurysms and dissections. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;20:348-357
10. Cademartiri F, van Geuns RJ, Nieman K, Meijboom F, de Feyter PJ. Images in cardiovascular medicine: multislice computed tomography for the evaluation and follow-up of stenting of aortic coarctation. Circulation 2004; 109:e176
11. Eichhorn JG, Long FR, Jourdan C, et al. Usefulness of multidetector CT imaging to assess vascular stents in children with congenital heart disease: an in vivo and in vitro study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72:544-551
12. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:653-661
13. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Comprehensive cardiac assessment with multislice computed tomography: evaluation of left ventricular function and perfusion in addition to coronary anatomy in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Heart 2006; 92:1779-1783
14. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009; 251:175-184
15. Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR 2009; 192:887-892
16. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:849-857
17. Lauer MS. Elements of danger: the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:841-843
18. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Nandalur KR, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs. AJR 2005; 184:288-294
19. Lenhart M, Volk M, Manke C, et al. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents. Radiology 2000; 217:173-178
20. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:171-180
21. Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:365-371
22. Smith RF, Rutt BK, Holdsworth DW. Anthropomorphic carotid bifurcation phantom for MRI applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:533-544
23. Muthurangu V, Taylor A, Andriantsimiavona R, et al. Novel method of quantifying pulmonary vascular resistance by use of simultaneous invasive pressure monitoring and phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow. Circulation 2004; 110:826-834
24. Maintz D, Kugel H, Schellhammer F, Landwehr P. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:218-224