Determinants of stent expansion in curved stenotic lesions: An in vitro experimental study

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 727-735

  Poerner, Tudor C ^a   Ludwig, Bettina ^a   Duda, Stephan H ^b   Diesing, Peter ^c   Kalmár, Gábor ^a   Süselbeck, Tim ^a   Kaden, Jens J ^a   Borggrefe, Martin ^a   Haase, Karl K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLOON DIAMETER; BALLOON DILATATION; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; IN VITRO STUDY; MINIMAL LUMINAL DIAMETER; PARAMETER; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE LUMINAL DIAMETER; SILASTIC TUBE; STENOSIS; STENT; STENT EXPANSION; VASODILATATION;

EID: 3042771407     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000133522.45958.52     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:701-706.
2. Richter GM, Roeren T, Noeldge G, et al. Initial long-term results of a randomised 5-year study: iliac stent implantation versus PTA. Vasa Suppl 1992; 35:192-193.
3. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:496-501.
4. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:489-495.
5. Popma JJ. Stent selection in clinical practice: have clinical trials provided the evidence we need? Am Heart J 2001; 142:378-380.
6. Schwartz RS. Pathophysiology of restenosis: interaction of thrombosis, hyperplasia, and/or remodeling. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81:14E-17E
7. Kraft M, Rutsch W, Boenick U. A multifunctional coronary circulation model: various applications for comparative studies of PTCA catheters. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1998; 43(suppl):302-303.
8. Kraft M, Krebs K, Rutsch W, Boenick U. Software components for data processing of measurement values in experimental studies with PTCA catheters. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1998; 43(suppl):136-137.
9. Kalmar G, Pörner T, Weigand C, et al. Optimal expansion of the multi-link stent. An in vitro study with high resolution roentgen technique. Z Kardiol 1998; 87:344-352.
10. Pörner T, Voelker W, Teubner J, et al. Quantifying the recoil of coronary stents: an in vitro study with a coronary stenosis model using high resolution roentgen technique. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1997; 42:205-206.
11. Kalmar G, Hübner F, Voelker W, et al. Radial force and wall apposition of balloon expandable stents in eccentric stenoses: an in vitro evaluation in a curved vessel model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13:499-508.
12. Lossef SV, Lutz RJ, Mundorf J, Barth KH. Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:341-349.
13. Flueckiger F, Sernthal H, Klein GE, et al. Strength, elasticity and plasticity of expandable metal stents: in vitro studies with three types of stress. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:745-750.
14. Berry JL, Newman VS, Ferrario CM, et al. A method to evaluate the elastic behavior of vascular stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996; 7:381-385.
15. Barragan P, Rieu R, Garitey V, et al. Elastic recoil of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50:112-119.
16. Costa MA, Sabate M, Kay IP, et al. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasonic volumetric quantification of stent recoil and neointimal formation of two new generation tubular stents. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:135-139.
17. Hoffmann R, Jansen C, König A, et al. Stent design related neointimal tissue proliferation in human coronary arteries-an intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:2007-2014.
18. Rogers C, Edelman E. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91:2995-3001.
19. Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M, et al. Does stent design affect probability of restenosis? A randomized trial comparing Multilink stents with GFX stents. Am Heart J 2001; 142:445-451.
20. Rieu R, Barragan P, Masson C, et al. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 1999; 46:380-391.