Transparency in a human-machine context: Approaches for fostering shared awareness/intent

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8525 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2014, Pages 181-190

  Lyons, Joseph B ^a   Havig, Paul R ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

human machine interaction; transparency; trust; trust in automation

Indexed keywords

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; HUMAN-MACHINE; NUMBER OF METHODS; TEAM WORK; TRUST;

TRANSPARENCY;

EID: 84903613964     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Veloso, M., Aisen, M., Howard, A., Jenkins, C., Mutlu, B., Scassellati, B.: WTEC Panel Report on Human-Robot Interaction Japan, South Korea, and China. World Technology Evaluation Center, Inc., Arlington (2012)
2. Ososky, S., Schuster, D., Phillips, E., Jentsch, F.: Building appropriate trust in humanrobot teams. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Trust in Autonomous Systems, pp. 60-65. AAAI, Palo Alto (2013)
3. Groom, V., Nass, C.: Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human-robot teams. Interaction Studies 8(3), 483-500 (2007)
4. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. of Social Issues 56, 81-103 (2000)
5. Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., Rosen, M.A.: On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors 50(3), 540-547 (2008)
6. Cohen, S.G., Bailey, D.E.: What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. of Management 23, 239-290 (1997)
7. Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D., Hinds, P.J.: Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 42-50 (2007)
8. Chen, J.Y.C., Barnes, M.J., Harper-Sciarini, M.: Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human performance issues and user interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 41(4), 435-454 (2011)
9. Lyons, J.B.: Being transparent about transparency: A model for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Trust in Autonomous Systems, pp. 48-53. AAAI, Palo Alto (2013)
10. Wang, L., Jamieson, G.A., Hollands, J.G.: Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. Human Factors 51, 281-291 (2009)
11. Dzindolet, M.T., Peterson, S.A., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 58, 697-718 (2003)
12. Kim, T., Hinds, P.: Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2006), pp. 80-85. IEEE, Hatfield (2006)
13. Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., Ewart, J., Parasuraman, R.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors 53(5), 517-527 (2011)
14. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709-734 (1995)
15. Fischer, K.: How people talk with robots: Designing dialogue to reduce user uncertainty. AI Magazine, 31-38 (2011)
16. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F.: (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. J. of App. Soc. Psych. 42(9), 2213-2230 (2012)
17. Broadbent, E., Kumar, V., Li, X., Sollers, J., Stafford, R.Q., MacDonald, B.A., Wegner, D.M.: Robots with displays screens: A robot with more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS ONE 8(8), e72589 (2013)
18. Breazeal, C., Aryananda, L.: Recognition of affective communicative intent in robot directed speech. Autonomous Robots 12(1), 83-104 (2002)
19. Arkin, R.C., Ulam, P., Wagner, A.R.: Moral decision-making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception. Proceedings of the IEEE 100(3), 571-589 (2012)
20. Coradeschi, S., Ishiguro, H., Asada, M., Shapiro, S., Thielscher, M., Breazeal, C., Mataric, M., Ishida, H.: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(4), 74-85 (2006)
21. Fessler, D.M.T., Holbrook, C., Snyder, J.K.: Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PLoS ONE 7(4), e32751 (2012)
22. Sims, V.K., Chin, M.G., Sushi, D.J., Barber, D.J., Ballion, J., Clark, B.R., Garfield, K.A., Dolezal, M.J., Shumaker, R., Finkelstein, N.: Anthropomorphism of robotic form: A response to affordances? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, 602-605 (2005)
23. Mutlu, B.: Designing embodied cues for dialogue with robots. AI Magazine, 17-30 (2011)
24. Parasuraman, R., Miller, C.: Trust and etiquette in high criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM 47, 51-55 (2004)
25. Zecca, M., Mizoguchi, Y., Endo, I.F., Kawabata, Y., Endo, N., Itoh, K., Takanishi, A.: Whole body emotion expressions for KOBIAN Humanoid Robot: Preliminary experiments with different emotional expression patterns. Paper presented at the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Toyama, Japan (2009)
26. de Melo, C., Carnevale, P., Read, S., Gratch, J.: Reverse appraisal: The importance of appraisals for the effect of emotion displays on people's decision-making in a social dilemma. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan (2012)
27. Geiselman, E.E., Johnson, C.M., Buck, D.R.: Flight deck automation: Invaluable collaborator or insidious enabler? Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 21, 22-26 (2013)
28. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 286-297 (2000)