Maternal age effect on mouse oocytes: New biological insight from proteomic analysis

Reproduction

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 55-72

  Schwarzer, Caroline ^a   Siatkowski, Marcin ^b,c   Pfeiffer, Martin J ^a   Baeumer, Nicole ^d   Drexler, Hannes C A ^a   Wang, Bingyuan ^a   Fuellen, Georg ^b,c   Boiani, Michele ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOMEDICINE   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^c ROSTOCK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; PROTEOME; SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE; TRANSCRIPTOME; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL AGING; CELL COUNT; COLLISIONALLY ACTIVATED DISSOCIATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE ONTOLOGY; ISOTOPE LABELING; KARYOTYPING; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATERNAL AGE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEOMICS; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; RNA TRANSLATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; AGING; ANIMAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

AGING; ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MATERNAL AGE; MICE; OOCYTES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 84903582339     PISSN: 14701626     EISSN: 17417899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1530/REP-14-0126     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ackermann M & Strimmer K 2009 A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 10 47. (doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-47)
2. Akan P, Alexeyenko A, Costea PI, Hedberg L, Solnestam BW, Lundin S, Hallman J, Lundberg E, Uhlen M & Lundeberg J 2012 Comprehensive analysis of the genome transcriptome and proteome landscapes of three tumor cell lines. Genome Medicine 4 86. (doi:10.1186/gm387)
3. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J & Lengauer T 2006 Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 22 1600-1607. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140) (Pubitemid 43985293)
4. Bouniol-Baly C, Hamraoui L, Guibert J, Beaujean N, Szollosi MS & Debey P 1999 Differential transcriptional activity associated with chromatin configuration in fully grown mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 60 580-587. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod60.3.580) (Pubitemid 29102386)
5. Cao S, Guo X, Zhou Z & Sha J 2012 Comparative proteomic analysis of proteins involved in oocyte meiotic maturation in mice. Molecular Reproduction and Development 79 413-422. (doi:10.1002/mrd.22044)
6. Cavaleri FM, Balbach ST, Gentile L, Jauch A, Bohm-Steuer B, Han YM, Scholer HR & BoianiM2008 Subsets of cloned mouse embryos and their non-random relationship to development and nuclear reprogramming. Mechanisms of Development 125 153-166. (doi:10.1016/j.mod. 2007.09.007) (Pubitemid 350299129)
7. Chandrakanthan V, Li A, Chami O & O'Neill C 2006 Effects of in vitro fertilization and embryo culture on TRP53 and Bax expression in B6 mouse embryos. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 4 61. (doi:10. 1186/1477-7827-4-61)
8. Demetrius L 2005 Of mice and men. When it comes to studying ageing and the means to slow it down, mice are not just small humans. EMBO Reports 6 S39-S44. (doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400422) (Pubitemid 44269467)
9. Eppig JJ & Wigglesworth K 2000 Development of mouse and rat oocytes in chimeric reaggregated ovaries after interspecific exchange of somatic and germ cell components. Biology of Reproduction 63 1014-1023. (doi:10.1095/ biolreprod63.4.1014)
10. Esteves TC, Balbach ST, Pfeiffer MJ, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Klein DC, Sinn M & Boiani M 2011 Somatic cell nuclear reprogramming of mouse oocytes endures beyond reproductive decline. Aging Cell 10 80-95. (doi:10. 1111/j.1474-9726. 2010.00644.x)
11. Geiger T,Wisniewski JR, Cox J, Zanivan S, Kruger M, Ishihama Y &MannM 2011 Use of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture as a spike-in standard in quantitative proteomics. Nature Protocols 6 147-157. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.192)
12. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J et al. 2004 Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 5 R80. (doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80)
13. Grondahl ML, Yding Andersen C, Bogstad J, Nielsen FC, Meinertz H & Borup R 2010 Gene expression profiles of single human mature oocytes in relation to age. Human Reproduction 25 957-968. (doi:10.1093/ humrep/deq014)
14. Hall VJ, Compton D, Stojkovic P, Nesbitt M, Herbert M, Murdoch A & Stojkovic M 2007 Developmental competence of human in vitro aged oocytes as host cells for nuclear transfer. Human Reproduction 22 52-62. (doi:10.1093/humrep/ del345) (Pubitemid 44942666)
15. Hamatani T, Falco G, Carter MG, Akutsu H, Stagg CA, Sharov AA, Dudekula DB, VanBuren V & Ko MS 2004 Age-associated alteration of gene expression patterns in mouse oocytes. Human Molecular Genetics 13 2263-2278. (doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh241) (Pubitemid 39359925)
16. Hodges CA, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Hassold TJ & Hunt PA 2005 SMC1β-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction. Nature Genetics 37 1351-1355. (doi:10.1038/ng1672) (Pubitemid 41722191)
17. Hu T, Liu S, Breiter DR, Wang F, Tang Y & Sun S 2008 Octamer 4 small interfering RNA results in cancer stem cell-like cell apoptosis. Cancer Research 68 6533-6540. (doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6642)
18. Jiao GZ, Cao XY, Cui W, Lian HY, Miao YL, Wu XF, Han D & Tan JH 2013 Developmental potential of prepubertal mouse oocytes is compromised due mainly to their impaired synthesis of glutathione. PLoS ONE 8 e58018. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058018)
19. Kersey PJ, Duarte J, Williams A, Karavidopoulou Y, Birney E & Apweiler R 2004 The International Protein Index: an integrated database for proteomics experiments. Proteomics 4 1985-1988. (doi:10.1002/pmic. 200300721) (Pubitemid 38880363)
20. Kocabas AM, Crosby J, Ross PJ, Otu HH, Beyhan Z, Can H, Tam WL, Rosa GJ, Halgren RG, Lim B et al. 2006 The transcriptome of human oocytes. PNAS 103 14027-14032. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0603227103) (Pubitemid 44452974)
21. Kosubek A, Klein-Hitpass L, Rademacher K, Horsthemke B & Ryffel GU 2010 Aging of Xenopus tropicalis eggs leads to deadenylation of a specific set of maternal mRNAs and loss of developmental potential. PLoS ONE 5 e13532. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013532)
22. Li L, Zheng P & Dean J 2010 Maternal control of early mouse development. Development 137 859-870. (doi:10.1242/dev.039487)
23. Lopes FL, Fortier AL, Darricarrere N, Chan D, Arnold DR & Trasler JM 2009 Reproductive and epigenetic outcomes associated with aging mouse oocytes. Human Molecular Genetics 18 2032-2044. (doi:10. 1093/hmg/ddp127)
24. Lord T & Aitken RJ 2013 Oxidative stress and ageing of the post-ovulatory oocyte. Reproduction 146 R217-R227. (doi:10.1530/REP-13-0111)
25. Ma P & Schultz RM 2008 Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) regulates histone acetylation, development, and gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos. Developmental Biology 319 110-120. (doi:10.1016/j. ydbio.2008.04.011)
26. Ma M, Guo X, Wang F, Zhao C, Liu Z, Shi Z, Wang Y, Zhang P, Zhang K, Wang N et al. 2008 Protein expression profile of the mouse metaphase-II oocyte. Journal of Proteome Research 7 4821-4830. (doi:10.1021/ pr800392s)
27. Mamo S, Gal AB, Bodo S & Dinnyes A 2007 Quantitative evaluation and selection of reference genes in mouse oocytes and embryos cultured in vivo and in vitro. BMC Developmental Biology 7 14. (doi:10.1186/ 1471-213X-7-14)
28. McGuinness BE, Anger M, Kouznetsova A, Gil-Bernabe AM, Helmhart W, Kudo NR, Wuensche A, aylor S, Hoog C, Novak B et al. 2009 Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Buβ1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Current Biology 19 369-380. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.064)
29. Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY & Schatten H 2009 Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Human Reproduction Update 15 573-585. (doi:10.1093/humupd/ dmp014)
30. Monti M, Zanoni M, Calligaro A, Ko MS, Mauri P & Redi CA 2013 Developmental arrest and mouse antral not-surrounded nucleolus oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 88 2. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.112.103887)
31. Monetti M, Nagaraj N, Sharma K & Mann M 2011 Large-scale phosphosite quantification in tissues by a spike-in SILAC method. Nature Methods 8 655-658. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.1647)
32. Myers DD 1978 Review of disease patterns and life span in aging mice: genetic and environmental interactions. Birth Defects Original Article Series 14 41-53. (Pubitemid 8277254)
33. Nelson JF, Gosden RG & Felicio LS 1985 Effect of dietary restriction on estrous cyclicity and follicular reserves in aging C57BL/6J mice. Biology of Reproduction 32 515-522. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod32.3.515)
34. Oliveri RS, Kalisz M, Schjerling CK, Andersen CY, Borup R & Byskov AG 2007 Evaluation in mammalian oocytes of gene transcripts linked to epigenetic reprogramming. Reproduction 134 549-558. (doi:10.1530/ REP-06-0315) (Pubitemid 47555048)
35. Pan H, Ma P, Zhu W & Schultz RM 2008 Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Developmental Biology 316 397-407. (doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.048)
36. Pfeiffer MJ, Balbach ST, Esteves TC, Crosetto N & BoianiM2010 Enhancing somatic nuclear reprogramming by Oct4 gain-of-function in cloned mouse embryos. International Journal of Developmental Biology 54 1649-1657. (doi:10.1387/ijdb.103197mp)
37. Pfeiffer MJ, Siatkowski M, Paudel Y, Balbach ST, Baeumer N, Crosetto N, Drexler HC, Fuellen G & Boiani M 2011 Proteomic analysis of mouse oocytes reveals 28 candidate factors of the "reprogrammome". Journal of Proteome Research 10 2140-2153. (doi:10.1021/pr100706k)
38. Rapti A, Trangas T, Samiotaki M, Ioannidis P, Dimitriadis E, Meristoudis C, Veletza S & Courtis N 2010 The structure of the 50-untranslated region of mammalian poly(A) polymerase-α mRNA suggests a mechanism of translational regulation. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 340 91-96. (doi:10.1007/s11010- 010-0405-x)
39. R Core Team 2012 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
40. Ryu BY, Orwig KE, Oatley JM, Avarbock MR & Brinster RL 2006 Effects of aging and niche microenvironment on spermatogonial stem cell selfrenewal. Stem Cells 24 1505-1511. (doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0580) (Pubitemid 44464667)
41. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J,Wolf J, ChenW & Selbach M 2011 Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473 337-342. (doi:10.1038/nature10098)
42. Schwarzer C, Esteves TC, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Le Gac S, Nordhoff V, Schlatt S & Boiani M 2012 ART culture conditions change the probability of mouse embryo gestation through defined cellular and molecular responses. Human Reproduction 27 2627-2640. (doi:10.1093/humrep/ des223)
43. Selesniemi K, Lee HJ, Muhlhauser A & Tilly JL 2011 Prevention of maternal aging-associated oocyte aneuploidy and meiotic spindle defects in mice by dietary and genetic strategies. PNAS 108 12319-12324. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.1018793108)
44. Sharov AA, Piao Y, Matoba R, Dudekula DB, Qian Y, VanBuren V, Falco G, Martin PR, Stagg CA, Bassey UC et al. 2003 Transcriptome analysis of mouse stem cells and early embryos. PLoS Biology 1 E74. (doi:10.1371/ journal.pbio.0000074) (Pubitemid 39112139)
45. Sharov AA, Falco G, Piao Y, Poosala S, Becker KG, Zonderman AB, Longo DL, Schlessinger D & Ko M 2008 Effects of aging and calorie restriction on the global gene expression profiles of mouse testis and ovary. BMC Biology 6 24. (doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-24)
46. Steuerwald NM, Bermudez MG, Wells D, Munne S & Cohen J 2007 Maternal age-related differential global expression profiles observed in human oocytes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 14 700-708. (doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60671-2) (Pubitemid 46951703)
47. Takahashi K & Yamanaka S 2006 Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126 663-676. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024) (Pubitemid 44233629)
48. Tarin JJ, Gomez-Piquer V, Pertusa JF, Hermenegildo C & Cano A 2004 Association of female aging with decreased parthenogenetic activation, raised MPF, and MAPKs activities and reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases activity and thiols in mouse oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 69 402-410. (doi:10.1002/mrd.20180) (Pubitemid 39463848)
49. Tatone C, Carbone MC, Gallo R, Delle Monache S, Di Cola M, Alesse E & Amicarelli F 2006 Age-associated changes in mouse oocytes during postovulatory in vitro culture: possible role for meiotic kinases and survival factor BCL2. Biology of Reproduction 74 395-402. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.105.046169) (Pubitemid 43122291)
50. Tong ZB, Gold L, Pfeifer KE, Dorward H, Lee E, Bondy CA, Dean J & NelsonLM2000Mater, amaternal effect gene required for early embryonic development in mice. Nature Genetics 26 267-268. (doi:10.1038/81547)
51. Velde ERT & Pearson PL 2002 The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human Reproduction Update 8 141-154. (doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141) (Pubitemid 34428965)
52. VitaleAM, Calvert ME,Mallavarapu M, Yurttas P, Perlin J,Herr J & Coonrod S 2007 Proteomic profiling of murine oocyte maturation. Molecular Reproduction and Development 74 608-616. (doi:10.1002/mrd.20648) (Pubitemid 46493750)
53. Vizcaino JA, Cote RG, Csordas A, Dianes JA, Fabregat A, Foster JM, Griss J, Alpi E, Birim M, Contell J et al. 2013 The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in. Nucleic Acids Research 41 D1063-D1069. (doi:10.1093/nar/gks1262)
54. Vogel C & Marcotte EM 2012 Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nature Reviews. Genetics 13 227-232. (doi:10.1038/nrg3185)
55. Wallace DC & Chalkia D 2013 Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5 a021220. (doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021220)
56. Walther DM & Mann M 2011 Accurate quantification of more than 4000 mouse tissue proteins reveals minimal proteome changes during aging. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 10 M110 004523. (doi:10.1074/mcp.M110.004523)
57. Wang S, Kou Z, Jing Z, Zhang Y, Guo X, Dong M, Wilmut I & Gao S 2010 Proteome of mouse oocytes at different developmental stages. PNAS 107 17639-17644. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1013185107)
58. Wilding M, Di Matteo L & Dale B 2005 The maternal age effect: a hypothesis based on oxidative phosphorylation. Zygote 13 317-323. (doi:10.1017/S0967199405003382) (Pubitemid 43032350)
59. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A & Mann M 2009 Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. Journal of Proteome Research 8 5674-5678. (doi:10.1021/pr900748n)
60. Wu G, Han D, Gong Y, Sebastiano V, Gentile L, Singhal N, Adachi K, Fischedick G, Ortmeier C, Sinn M et al. 2013 Establishment of totipotency does not depend on Oct4A. Nature Cell Biology 15 1089-1097. (doi:10.1038/ncb2816)
61. Yu G, Li F, Qin Y, Bo X, Wu Y & Wang S 2010 GOSemSim: an R package for measuring semantic similarity among GO terms and gene products. Bioinformatics 26 976-978. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq064)
62. Zhang P,Ni X, Guo Y, Guo X, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Huo R &Sha J 2009 Proteomicbased identification of maternal proteins in mature mouse oocytes. BMC Genomics 10 348. (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-348)
63. Zuccotti M, Boiani M, Garagna S & Redi CA 1998 Analysis of aneuploidy rate in antral and ovulated mouse oocytes during female aging. Molecular Reproduction and Development 50 305-312. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199807)50: 3〈305::AID-MRD6〉3.0.CO;2-N) (Pubitemid 28268469)