Partisanship in a social setting

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 687-704

  Klar, Samara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903554353     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12087     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bartels, Larry M. 2002. "Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions." Political Behavior 24(2): 117-50.
2. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bullock, John G. 2011. "Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate." American Political Science Review 105(August): 496-515.
4. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Caruso, Eugene M., Nicole L. Mead, and Emily Balcetis 2009. "Political Partisanship Influences Perception of Biracial Candidates' Skin Tone." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 20168-73.
6. Druckman, James N. 2004. "Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects." American Political Science Review 98: 671-86.
7. Druckman, James N., and Cindy D. Kam 2011. "Students as Experimental Participants." In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski, and Arthur Lupia New York: Cambridge University Press, 41-57.
8. Druckman, James N., and Kjersten Nelson 2003. "Framing and Deliberation." American Journal of Political Science 47: 729-45.
9. Druckman, James N., and Lilach Nir 2008. "Campaign Mixed-Message Flows and Timing of Vote Decision." International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20: 326-46.
10. Druckman, James N., Erik Peterson, and Rune Slothuus 2013. "How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation." American Political Science Review 107: 57-79.
11. Gerber, Alan, and Donald Green 1999. "Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias." Annual Review of Political Science 2: 189-210.
12. Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Christopher W. Larimer 2008. "Social Pressure and Voter Turnout." American Political Science Review 102(1): 33-48.
13. Gerber, Alan S., and Gregory A. Huber 2010. "Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments." American Journal of Political Science 54: 153-73.
14. González, Roberto, and Rupert Brown 2006. "Dual Identities and Intergroup Contact." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 753-67.
15. Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. "The Strength of Weak Ties." American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-80.
16. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber 2002. "Reclaiming the Experimental Tradition in Political Science." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, 3rd ed., ed. H. V. Milner and I. Katznelson New York: Norton, 805-32.
17. Groenendyk, Eric. 2012. "Under Pressure." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
18. Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague 2004. Political Disagreement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague 1987. "Networks in Context." American Political Science Review December: 1197-1216.
20. Isenberg, Daniel J. 1986. "Group Polarization." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1141-51.
21. Jacoby, William G. 1988. "The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes." American Journal of Political Science 32: 643-61.
22. Jennings, M. Kent, Laura Stoker, and Jake Bowers. 2009. "Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined." Journal of Politics 71: 782-99.
23. Jost, John T. 2006. "The End of the End of Ideology." American Psychologist 61: 651-70.
24. Klar, Samara. Forthcoming. "The Influence of Competing Identity Primes on Political Preferences." Journal of Politics 75(4), doi:10.1017/S0022381613000698.
25. Kunda, Ziva. 1990. "The Case for Motivated Reasoning." Psychological Bulletin 108: 480-98.
26. Lascher, Edward L., and John L. Korey 2011. "The Myth of the Independent Voter, California Style." California Journal of Politics and Policy 3, 1 (2011): article 2.
27. Lavine, Howard, Christopher Johnston, and Marco Steenbergen 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010. "Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters." Political Behavior 32(1): 111-31.
29. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut Norpoth, and Herbert F. Weisberg 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. Lodge, Milton, and Charles Taber 2000. "Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning." In Elements of Reason, ed. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183-213.
31. Magleby, David B., Candice J. Nelson, and Mark C. Westlye 2011. "The Myth of the Independent Voter Revisited." In Facing the Challenge of Democracy, ed. Paul Sniderman and Benjamin Highton Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 238-263.
32. Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. "The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence." In Research in Micropolitics, ed. Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Richard Shapiro Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 151-93.
33. Mutz, Diana C. 2002. "The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation." American Journal of Political Science 46: 838-55.
34. Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. "Polarizing Cues." American Journal of Political Science 56: 52-66.
36. Nir, Lilach. 2005. "Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation." International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17: 422-42.
37. Peterson, Michael Bang, Martin Skov, Soren Serritzlew, and Thomas Rasmoy. 2013. "Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues." Political Behavior 35(4): 831-854.
38. Pew Research Center. 2008. "Forum on Religious and Public Life." http://religions.pewforum.org/. (accessed December 31, 2013).
39. Pew Research Center. 2010. "Forum on Religious and Public life." http://religions.pewforum.org/. (accessed December 31, 2013).
40. Pew Research Center. 2011. "Partisan Divide Over Alternative Energy Widens." http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/10/partisan-divide-over-alternative-energy-widens (accessed December 31, 2013).
41. Popielarz, Pamela A., and J. Miller McPherson 1995. "On the Edge or in Between." American Journal of Sociology 101(3): 698-720.
42. Price, Vincent, Joseph N. Cappella, and Lilach Nir 2002. "Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000." Political Communication 19: 73-93.
43. R., Huckfeldt, P. Johnson, and J. Sprague 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Redlawsk, David. 2002. "Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration." Journal of Politics 64: 1021-44.
45. Redlawsk, David. 2004. "What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns." Political Psychology 25: 595-610.
46. Shook, Natalie J., and Russell H. Fazio 2009. "Political Ideology, Exploration of Novel Stimuli, and Attitude Formation." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 995-98.
47. Sinclair, Betsy. 2012. The Social Citizen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Slothuus, Rune, and Claes H. de Vreese 2010. "Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects." Journal of Politics 72(3): 630-45.
49. Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge 2006. "Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs." American Journal of Political Science 50: 755-69.
50. Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. "Accountability and Perseverance of First Impressions." Social Psychology Quarterly, 46: 285-92.
51. Tetlock, Philip E., and J. Kim 1987. "Accountability and Judgment in a Personality Prediction Task." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 700-709.
52. Tetlock, Philip E., Penny S. Visser, Ramadhar Singh, Mark Polifroni, Amanda Scott, Sara Beth Elson, Philip Mazzocco, and Phillip Rescober 2007. "People as Intuitive Prosecutors." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 195-209.
53. Tilley, James, and Sara B. Hobolt 2011. "Is the Government to Blame?" Journal of Politics 73: 316-30.
54. U.S. Department Institute of Education. 2011. The Condition of Education 2011. (NCES 2011-033), Indicator 6.
55. Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.