A bibliometric analysis of publications of the Chemistry Department, University of Pune, India, 1999-2012

Annals of Library and Information Studies

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 85-92

  Nagarkar, Shubhada ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUNE   (India)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Chemistry; Citation analysis; Network analysis; University of Pune

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903551042     PISSN: 09725423     EISSN: 09752404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Garfield E, Science Citation Index-A new dimension in indexing, Science, 144 (3619) (1964) 649-654.
2. Vallmitjana N, Sabaté L, Citation analysis of Ph. D. dissertation references as a tool for collection management in an academic chemistry library, College & research libraries, 69 (1) (2008) 72-82.
3. Gordon M D, Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierachies in the social sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1) (1982) 55-57.
4. Garfield E, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178 (4060) (1972) 471-479.
5. Osareh F, Zare A, A Study on Scientific Product of the University of Tehran in Web of Science Database during 1989-2009, Technological Convergence and Social Networks in Information Management, (Heidelberg; Springer), 2010, p. 211-221.
6. Meho L I, The rise and rise of citation analysis, Available at Arxiv preprint physics/0701012 (Accessed on 24 March 2014).
7. Meho L I, Yang K, Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13) (2007) 2105-2125.
8. Levine-Clark M, Gil E, A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools, Online information review, 33 (5) (2009) 986-996.
9. Garfield E, Pudovkin A I and Istomin V S, Why do we need algorithmic historiography?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5) (2003), 400-412.
10. Garfield E, PudovkincA I and Istomin V S, Algorithmic citation-linked historiography-Mapping the literature of science, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39 (1) (2002) 14-24.
11. Garfield E, Pudovkin A I, The HistCite system for mapping and bibliometric analysis of the output of searches using the ISI Web of Knowledge, Available at http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/asist112004.pdf (Accessed on 24 March 2014).
12. Kademani B, Kalyane V, Bibliometric indicators for publication productivity analysis of an individual scientist, ISSI: the International Journal of Sscientometrics and Informetrics, 2 (4) (1996) 49-58.
13. Seglen P O, Aksnes D W, Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research, Scientometrics, 49 (1) (2000) 125-143.
14. Schubert A, Braun T, Some scientometric measures of publishing performance for 85 Hungarian research institutes, Scientometrics, 3 (5) (1981) 379-388.
15. Phillimore A, University research performance indicators in practice: The University Grants Committee's evaluation of British universities, 1985-86, Research Policy, 18 (5) (1989) 255-271.
16. Lee C K, A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore, Scientometrics, 56 (1) (2003) 95-110.
17. Garg K, Rao M K D, Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: A case study of an Indian physics laboratory, Scientometrics, 13 (5) (1988) 261-269.
18. Torres-Salinas D, Lopez-Cózar E D and Jiménez-Contreras E, Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus, Scientometrics, 80 (3) (2009) 761-774.
19. Molinari J F, Molinari A, A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions, Scientometrics, 75 (1) (2008) 163-174.
20. Miyairi N, Chang H W, Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000-2009, Scientometrics, 92 (1) (2012) 197-205.
21. Fu H Z, Chuang K Y, Wang M H and Ho Y S, Characteristics of research in China assessed with Essential Science Indicators, Scientometrics, 88 (3) (2011) 841-862.
22. Klaić B, Analysis of the scientific productivity of researchers from The Republic of Croatia for the period 1990-1992, Scientometrics, 32 (2) (1995) 133-152.
23. Klaić B, Scientometric analysis of the research activities of chemists from the "Rugjer Bošković" Institute (Yugoslavia), 1976-1985, Scientometrics, 19 (1) (1990) 11-24.
24. Kim M J, Kim B J, A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992-1998, Journal of Information Science, 26 (2) (2000) 111-119.
25. Vinkler P, Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research institute, Available at https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/869 (Accessed on 24 March 2014).
26. Guay Y, Emergence of basic research on the periphery: Organic chemistry in India, 1907-1926, Scientometrics, 10 (1) (1986) 77-94.
27. Kademani B, Surwase V, Sagar A, Mohan L, Gaderao C, Kumar A, Kalyane V and Prakasan E, Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 10 (1) (2005) 65.
28. Kademani B, Kumar V, Surwase G, Sagar A, Mohan L, Kumar A and Gaderao C, Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Scientometrics, 71 (1) (2007) 25-57.
29. Bishop N, Gillet V J, Holliday J D and Willett P, Chemoinformatics research at the University of Sheffield: a history and citation analysis, Journal of Information Science, 29 (4) (2003) 249-267.
30. McCain K W, McCain R A, Influence & Incorporation: John Forbes Nash and the "Nash Equilibrium", Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47 (1) (2010) 1-2.
31. Balasubramani R, Murugan C, Mapping of Tapioca (Sago) Research in India: A Scientometric Analysis. Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/546/ (Accessed on 24 March 2014).
32. Thulasi K, Arunachalam S, Mapping of cholera research in India using HistCite, Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57 (3) (2010) 310-326.
33. Karpagam R, Gopalakrishnan S, Natarajan M, and Babu B R, Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990-2009, Scientometrics, 89 (2) (2011) 501-522.