Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000-2009

Scientometrics

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 197-205

  Miyairi, Nobuko ^a   Chang, Han Wen ^a  

^a THOMSON REUTERS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Highly cited papers; Indicators; Science; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862643579     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0722-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abt, H. A. (2000). Do important papers produce high citation counts? Scientometrics, 48(1), 65-70. doi: 10. 1023/a: 1005680318379.
2. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159-170. doi: 10. 3152/147154403781776645.
3. Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213-224. doi: 10. 1023/B: SCIE. 0000018529. 58334. eb.
4. Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 383-389. doi: 10. 1007/bf02017156.
5. Basu, A. (2006). Using ISI's 'highly cited researchers' to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence. Scientometrics, 68(3), 361-375. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-006-0117-x.
6. Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481-497.
7. Fu, H. Z., Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Characteristics of research in China assessed with essential science indicators. Scientometrics, 88(3), 841-862. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0416-8.
8. Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419-435. doi: 10. 1556/Scient. 67. 2006. 3. 6.
9. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311-316. doi: 10. 1038/430311a.
10. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited library and information science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-007-1927-1.
11. Ma, R. M., Ni, C. Q., & Qiu, J. P. (2008). Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics, 76(2), 245-260. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-007-1913-7.
12. National Science Council, Taiwan. (2006, November 14, 2011). Bilateral Cooperation. Retrieved March 6, 2012 from http://www. nsc. gov. tw/int/ct. asp?xItem=10186&ctNode=1210.
13. Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397-401. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0007-0.
14. Plomp, R. (1994). The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research groups scientific performance. Scientometrics, 29(3), 377-393. doi: 10. 1007/bf02033446.
15. Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2011). Measuring research excellence number of nobel prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 582-600. doi: 10. 1108/00220411111145007.
16. Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54(3), 381-397. doi: 10. 1023/a: 1016082432660.
17. Zhu, X., Wu, Q., Zheng, Y. Z., & Ma, X. (2004). Highly cited research papers and the evaluation of a research university: A case study: Peking University 1974-2003. Scientometrics, 60(2), 237-247. doi: 10. 1023/b: scie. 0000027795. 69665. 09.