Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the chemistry division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 65-89

  Kademani, B S ^a   Kumar, V ^a   Surwase, G ^a   Sagar, A ^a   Mohan, L ^a   Gaderao, C R ^a   Kumar, A ^a   Kalyane, V L ^a   Prakasan, E R ^a  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Authorship pattern; BARC; Bibliometrics; Bradford distributon; Channels of communication; Chemistry Division; Collaboration coefficient; Individual department; Individual division; Individual institution; Lotka's Law; Publication productivity; R D laboratory; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349442433     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bishop, N., Gillet, V.J., Holliday, J.D. and Willet, P. 2003. Chemoinformatics research at the University of Sheffield: A history and citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 29, no.4: 249-267.
2. Carpenter, M.P., Gibb, F., Harris, M., Irvin, J., Martin, B.R. and Narin, F. 1988. Bibliographic profiles for British academic institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics, Vol. 14, no.3-4: 213-233.
3. Cohen, J.E. 1981. Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in three biomedical research institutions. Scientometrics, Vol. 3, no.6: 467-487.
4. Dizon, L.B. and Sadorra, M.S.M. 1995. Patterns of publication by the staff of an International Fisheries Research Center. Scientometrics, Vol. 32, no.1: 67-75.
5. Frohlich, C. and Resler, L. 2001. Analysis of publications and citations from a Geophysics Research Institute. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52, no.9: 701-713.
6. Garg, K.C. and Rao, M.K.D. 1988. Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: A case study of an Indian physics laboratory. Scientometrics, Vol. 13, no.5-6: 261-269.
7. Gupta, B.M., Suresh Kumar and Khanna, H.K. 1999. Science in India: performance of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research laboratories based on the productivity profile of scientists. Research Evaluation, Vol. 8, no.3: 177-187.
8. Gupta, B.M. and Karisiddappa, C.R. 2000. Application of statistical models to the collaborative publications data in theoretical population genetics. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 5, no.1: 37-51.
9. Gupta, D.K. 1996. Lotka's law and it's application to author productivity distribution of psychological literature of Africa, 1966-1975 (2 pts.). In: Gupta, B.M. ed. Handbook of Library Archives and Information Centres in India.Vol.13, New Delhi: Segment Books: 343-372.
10. Guay, Y. 1986. Emergence of basic research on the periphery: Organic chemistry in India, 1907-1926. Scientometrics, Vol. 10, no.1-2: 77-94.
11. Kalyane, V.L. and Kalyane, S.V. 1991. Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity system. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 38, no.1: 8-29.
12. Kalyane and Vidyasagar Rao K. 1992. Collaboration trends in sugercane research - A case study. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 39, no.1: 9-11.
13. Kalyane, V.L. and Kalyane, S.V. 1994. Database on creativity and innovation communication productivity of science in India: A case study. Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 7, no.1: 3-44.
14. Kalyane and Vidyasagar Rao K. 1995. Quantification of credits for authorship. ILA Bulletin, Vol. 30, no.3-4: 94-96.
15. Kalyane, V.L. and Sen, B.K. 1995. A bibliometric study of the Journal of Oilseeds Research. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 42, no.4: 121-141.
16. Kalyane, V.L. and Kalyane, S.V. 1996. R & D communication strategy vis-à-vis librarianship. Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 4, no.2: 105-135.
17. Kalyane, V.L. 1999. BARC Progress Reports - 1998. Mumbai: Library and Information Services Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: 74-93.
18. Klaic, B. 1990. Scientometric analysis of the research activities of Chemists from the Rugjer Bošković Institute (Yugoslavia). 1976-1985. Scientometrics, Vol. 19, no.1-2: 11-24.
19. Kim, M.J. and Kim, B.J. 2000. A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992-1998. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 26, no.2: 111-119.
20. King. J. 1998. The use of bibliometric techniques for institutional research evaluation: A study of Avian Virology Research. Scientometrics, Vol.41, no.3-4: 295-313.
21. Koganuramath, M.M., Angadi, M. and Kademani, B.S. 2002. Bibliometric dimension of innovation communication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 7, no.1: 69-76.
22. Kostoff, R.N., Eberhart, H.J., Toothman, D.R. and Pellenbarg, R. 1997. Database tomography for technical intelligence: Comparative roadmaps of the research impact assessment literature and the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Scientometrics, Vol. 40, no.1: 103-138.
23. Lee, C.K. 2003. A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics, Vol. 56, no.1: 95-110.
24. Lotka, A.J. 1926. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 16, no.12: 317-323.
25. Macrina, F.L. 2000. Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Case Studies. Washington: ASM press.
26. Minor, L. and Dostatni, P. 1991. A bibliometric study of the publications of the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM). Scientometrics, Vol. 22, no.1: 41-63.
27. Nalimov, V.V., Adler, Y.P. and Granovsky, Y.V. 1966. Information Systems in the Mathematical Theory of Experiment, In: V.V. Nalimov, ed. Kibernetica i Dokumentalistik. Mascow.
28. Narin, F. 1976. Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activities. New Jersey: Computer Horizons, Inc.
29. Potter, W.G. 1981. Lotka's law revised. Library Trends, Vol. 3, no.1:21-39.
30. Price, D.J. De. S. 1965. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia: Columbia University Press: 86-91.
31. Pritchard, A. 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 25, no.4: 348-349.
32. Salisbury, G.W. 1980. Research productivity of the State Agricultural Experiment Station System - measured by scientific publication output. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, Vol. 762: 1-63.
33. Sapre, A.V. and Kesavdas, T. 1998. List of publications of Chemistry Division (1970-1997), In: List of publications 1973-1997, Chemistry Group. Mumbai: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
34. Schloegl, C., Gorraiz, J., Bart, C. and Bargmann, M. 2003. Evaluating two Australian university departments : Lessons learned. Scientometrics, Vol. 56, no.3 : 287-299.
35. Schubert, A. and Braun, T. 1981. Some scientometric measures of publishing performance for 85 Hungarian Research Institutes. Scientometrics, Vol. 3, no.5: 379-388.
36. Swarna, T., Kalyane, V.L. and Vijai Kumar. 2002. Scientometric dimensions of technical reports from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 7, no.1: 17-30.
37. Ugolini, D., Parodi, S and Santi, L. 1997. Analysis of publication quality in Cancer Research Institute. Scientometrics, Vol. 38, no.2: 265-274.
38. Venkateswarlu, K.S. and George, A.M. 1998. Chemistry in Atomic Energy Programmes : An Account of 50 Years, 1948-1997 - A Saga of Excellence and Relevance. Mumbai: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
39. Vinkler, P. 1990. Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research Institute, In: L. Egge, and R. Rousseau, eds. Informetrics. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers: 309-334.
40. Yankevich, W.F.1982. Analysis of publication and invention productivity in some Soviet academic institutions. Scientometrics, Vol. 4, no.6: 431-437.
41. Zachos, G. 1991. Research output evaluation of two university departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, Vol. 21, no.2: 195-221.