Investigating the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) framework to capture user needs in the concept stage of rehabilitation technology development

Assistive Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 164-173

  Sivan, Manoj ^a   Gallagher, Justin ^b   Holt, Ray ^b   Weightman, Andy ^b   Levesley, Martin ^b   Bhakta, Bipin ^a  

^a LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

robot

Indexed keywords

ROBOTS;

HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; REHABILITATION DEVICES; REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; STROKE REHABILITATION; USER CENTERED DESIGNS; USER-CENTERED DESIGN PROCESS;

HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT;

DEVICES; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERVIEW; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SELF HELP DEVICE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; ROBOTICS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 84903539663     PISSN: 10400435     EISSN: 19493614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2014.903315     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ada, L., Canning, C. G., Carr, J. H., Kilbreath, S. L., &, Shepherd, R. B. (1994). Task specific training of reaching and manipulation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
2. Bridgelal Ram, M., Campling (nee Browne), N., Grocott, P., &, Weir, H. (2008). A methodology for a structured survey of the healthcare literature related to medical device users. Evaluation, 14 (1), 49-73.
3. Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S.,. Stucki, G. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 34 (5), 205-210.
4. Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Ustun, B., &, Stucki, G. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 37 (4), 212-218. doi: 10.1080/16501970510040263 (Pubitemid 41025328)
5. Cook, A. M., &, Polgar, J. (2008). Cook and Husseys assistive technology: Principles and practices (3rd. ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
6. Cooper, R. G., &, Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1986). An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3 (2), 71-85.
7. Egglestone, S. R., Axelrod, L., Nind, T., Turk, R., Wilkinson, A., Burridge, J.,. Rodden, T. (2009, April). A design framework for a home-based stroke rehabilitation system: Identifying the key components. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, London, England.
8. Fouladinejad, F., &, Roberts, J. R. (1996, October). A computer aided learning package for training users and maintainers of medical equipment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, "Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine," Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
9. Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Schouten, J., Dickson, H., Frommelt, P., Omar, Z.,. Stucki, G. (2004). ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 36 (44), 135-141. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016776 (Pubitemid 39307123)
10. Giuntini, R. E. (2000). Developing safe, reliable medical devices. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry,. 22, 60-67.
11. Gould, J. D., &, Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 300-331.
12. Grundy, E., Ahlburg, D., Ali, M., Breeze, E., &, Sloggett, A. (1999). Research report 94: Disability in Great Britain. London, England: Corporate Document Services.
13. Holt, R., Makower, S., Jackson, A., Culmer, P., Levesley, M., Richardson, R.,. Bhakta, B. (2007, June). User involvement in developing Rehabilitation Robotic devices: An essential requirement. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, the Netherlands.
14. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system Interaction Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. (ISO 9241-210). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
15. Johnson, M. J., Feng, X., Johnson, L. M., &, Winters, J. M. (2007). Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4, 6. Retrieved from http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/ 6.
16. King, T. W. (1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Lin, L. (1998, October). Human error in patient-controlled analgesia: Incident reports and experimental evaluation. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Chicago, IL.
18. Lu, E. C., Wang, R. H., Hebert, D., Boger, J., Galea, M. P., &, Mihailidis, A. (2011). The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: Identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Govt]. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 6, 420-431. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.544370
19. McDonagh, D., Bruseberg, A., &, Haslam, C. (2002). Visual product evaluation: exploring users "emotional relationships with products." Applied Ergonomics, 33, 231-240. (Pubitemid 34626544)
20. Powers, D. M., &, Greenberg, N. (1999). Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 59, 539-543. (Pubitemid 30056748)
21. Riener, R., Nef, T., &, Colombo, G. (2005). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing, 43 (1), 2-10. (Pubitemid 40277659)
22. Rochford, L., &, Rudelius, W. (1997). New product development process: Stages and successes in the medical products industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 26 (1), 67-84.
23. Shah, S. G., &, Robinson, I. (2006). User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: Structured literature review. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services, 19, 500-515.
24. Shah, S. G., Robinson, I., &, AlShawi, S. (2009). Developing medical device technologies from users perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25, 514-521. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990328
25. Skilbeck, C. E., Wade, D. T., Hewer, R. L., &, Wood, V. A. (1983). Recovery after stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 46 (1), 5-8. (Pubitemid 13159683)
26. Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD). (2003). The Italian guidelines for stroke prevention and treatment. Milano, Italy: Hyperphar Group.
27. Waller, S., Langdon, P. M., &, Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Converting disability data into a format suitable for estimating design exclusion. London, England: Springer-Verlag.
28. Weightman, A. P. H., Preston, N., Holt, R., Allsop, M., Levesley, M., &, Bhakta, B. (2010). Engaging children in healthcare technology design: developing rehabilitation technology for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Engineering Design, 21, 579-600.
29. World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health-ICF.
30. World Health Organization. (2003). Medical device regulations: Global overview and guiding principles.